Chennai Madurai Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Natarajan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 26.10.2015 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents herein to grant permission and adequate police protection for conducting the Thevar Jeyandhi festival in the petitioner's village by putting Pongal and conducting Villu Pattu program on 30.10.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent dated 26.10.2015 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents herein to grant permission and adequate police protection for conducting the Thevar Jeyandhi festival in the petitioner's village by putting Pongal and conducting Villu Pattu program on 30.10.2015. 2. The second respondent herein ...
N. Ilango and Others Vs. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Admini ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ ofMandamus directing the second respondent to consider the proposal of 3rd respondent made in Na.Ka.No.7168/2012/C1/ dated 01.06.2015 and extend the benefit of Old pension scheme to the petitioners.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by 15 petitioners seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent/Commissioner of Municipal Administration,Chepauk,Chennai, to consider the proposal of 3rd respondent/ Commissioner,Sivakasi Municipality,Virudhunagar District made in Na.Ka.No.7168/2012/C1/ dated 01.06.2015 and extend the benefit of old pension scheme to the petitioners. 2. The petitioners were appointed through the employment exchange in the available vacancy at the 3rd respondent corporation on daily wages basis. Subsequently, as they were denied employment and as there was break in service, they approached the learned Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal, by filing...
National Textile Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ettappan and Sons, Regd. Partner ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, against the judgment and decree dated 31.03.2003 and made in R.C.A.No.18 of 2001 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, reversing the order and decree dated 24.11.2000 and made in RCOP No.2 of 2000 on the file of I Additional Rent Controller, Tirunelveli.) 1. The tenant is the revision petitioner. 2. This revision arises out of a judgment made in R.C.A.No.18 of 2001 by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority (II Additional Subordinate Judge), Tirunelveli reversing the order of the learned Rent Controller (I Additional District Munsif), Tirunelveli, dismissing R.C.O.P.No.2 of 2000 filed by the landlords/respondents. 3. The petition mentioned premises is a shop bearing door Nos.7 and 8 in the building bearing Municipal Door Nos.58-C situate in the ground floor of Raja Complex in Tirunelveli Junction measuring about 600 sq. feet. It belongs to the respondents...
Ponmuthuramalingam Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to use Mike and Box Speaker for conducting Pasumpon Muthu Ramalingathevar's 108th Guru Pooja Vizha on 30.10.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to use Mike and Box Speaker for conducting the Pasumpon Muthu Ramalingathevar's 108th Guru Pooja vizha on 30.10.2015. 2. The Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that for the past three years no person has been permitted to use mike-set on the eve of the Gurupooja of Pasumpon Muthramalinga Thevar and Immanuvel Sekar, to maintain peace and public tranquillity. So, when the petitioner seeking permission to put up the mike- set on 08.10.2015, no order has been passed. Hence, the petitioner prays for a direction to the respondents to give permission to use mike-...
P. Murughaiya Vs. The Inspector of Police, Uthumalai Police Station, U ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to give permission and protection to the "Musical programme" in the event of festival of Erathamudaiyarkulam Sree Senpagavalli Eskkiyamman Kovil at 4/18 North Street, Erathamudaiyarkulam, V.K.Pudhur Taluk, Tirunelveli District on 04.11.2015.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to give permission and protection to the "Musical programme" in the event of festival of Erathamudaiyarkulam Sree Senpagavalli Eskkiyamman Kovil at 4/18 North Street, Erathamudaiyarkulam, V.K.Pudhur Taluk, Tirunelveli District on 04.11.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the villagers jointly decided to conduct the said festival of Eratham...
Ramasamy Vs. The District Employment Officer, O/o The District Employm ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to sponsor the petitioner herein for the post of either Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver under the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner for the appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver which is vacant on 20.06.2014 (date of call letter). Common Order: 1. The petitioners/Ramasamy, Subramani and Dhanapal have filed the writ petitions in W.P(MD)Nos.11321, 11761 and 11762 of 2014 respectively seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to sponsor their names for the post of either Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver under the 2nd respondent and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider them for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant cum Typist or Heavy Vehicle Driver which is vacant on 20.06.201...
Tvl.T. Gurunathan and Brothers, represented through its Prop. T. Gurun ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer in W.P.(MD).No.33 of 2011:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of declaration declaring that Section 19(1), 19(10) and 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 10(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 are inconsistent with the charging Section 3 and the General Scheme of annual assessment under Sections 20,21,22 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and void as being arbitrary, irrational and infringing the rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and the resultant reversal of the Input Tax Credit invoking Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value added Tax Act 2006 as illegal, invalid and therefore unenforceable.) Common Order: Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are all taken up together and decided by a common order. 2. These Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Con...
S. Soundarrajan Vs. The Director General of Police, State of Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned order dated 20.10.2015 in CPO No.804/2015, C.No.H1/21611/2009, on the file of the 2nd respondent and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to retire with effect from 31.10.2015 and pass such other suitable order and thereby render justice.) 1. This Writ Petition has been filed by S.Sounderrajan challenging the order of suspension passed on 20.10.2015 placing him under suspension on the ground that there were grave charges in TDP case No.13/2009 pending enquiry before the Commissioner for Disciplinary Proceedings, Tiruchirappalli. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that when the charge was issued on 25.08.2009 against the petitioner with baseless and false allegations, the disciplinary proceedings cannot be allowed to...
Shanmugam and Another Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Ramnad Distric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
(Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent police to direct the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.81 of 2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent within the stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the first respondent police to direct the second respondent to file a final report in Crime No.81 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent within the stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.81 of 2015 on 15.06.2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act,. However, the sec...
A. Ishwarya Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 2nd respondent police to not to harass the petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for a direction, to the 2nd respondent police to not to harass the petitioner. 3. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner's husband, petition enquiry has been conducted and the same has been closed in C.S.R.No.184 of 2015 . 4. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. However, in case of conducting any enquiry, the second respondent is directed to follow the dictum laid down in D.K.Basu Vs. State of West Bengal reported in AIR (1997) SC 610....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »