Skip to content

Chennai Madurai Court October 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 08 2015

S. Sankarasubramanian Vs. S. Guhan and Others

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Oct-08-2015

(Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order made in I.A.Nos.76 and 77 of 2015 in O.S.No.31 of 1985, dated 16.03.2015, on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tenkasi.) Common Order 1. Since both revisions are connected in factual matrix, they were heard together and are being disposed of together 2. These revisions arose out of I.A.Nos. 76 and 77 of 2015 in I.A.No.149 of 2007 in O.S.No.31 of 1985 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, Tenkasi. This is a Will matter. It will give lot of controvercies. It has given controversies, because the genuineness of the Will is in issue, but this necessarily has to be set at rest by appreciation of evidence by the parties. 3. Originally, it started from a partition suit in O.S.No.31 of 1985. A preliminary decree was passed. Both sides and their mother Balammal were allotted shares. Final decree is yet to be passed. The matter went into rough weather, when Balamm...


Oct 08 2015

R. Udhayasuriyan and Another Vs. Kennady, Inspector of Police, Theni D ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Oct-08-2015

(Prayer:Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to initiate appropriate Contempt Proceedings as against the contemnor herein for his wilful, wanton and flagrant violation of the order dated 20.10.2014 made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16061 of 2014 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the contempt petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Contempt Petition is dismissed as withdrawn....


Oct 08 2015

Velmayil Vs. State, rep by The Inspector of Police, Coutrallam Police ...

Court: Chennai Madurai

Decided on: Oct-08-2015

(Prayer:Appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment and conviction dated 11.01.2012 made in S.C.No.78 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.III], Tirunelveli.) S. Nagamuthu, J. The appellant is the first accused in S.C.No.78 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court No.III], Tirunelveli. The second accused in the case was one Mr.S.Iyyappan, who is the son of the first accused. The Trial Court framed as many as two charges as detailed below. ChargeAccused Penal Provisions11302 IPC22302 r/w 109 IPC By Judgment dated 11.01.2012, the Trial Court has acquitted the second accused, but convicted the first accused, as detailed below:- Convicted under Sections Sentence imposedFine amount302 IPCTo undergo imprisonment for lifeRs.10,000/- in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. As against the said conviction and sentence, the appellant has come up w...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial