Chennai Madurai Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Vijaya and Another Vs. K. Karthikeyan and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
(Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the order of award dated 25.05.2011 passed in MCOP No.79 of 2010 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Chief Judicial Magistrate), Thanjavur at Kumbakonam.) 1. The first appellant is the wife and the second appellant is the mother of the deceased, who filed a claim petition before the Tribunal, claiming a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- as compensation, in respect of the death of the deceased-Govindarajan. The deceased, aged about 58 years, retired as Postal Assistant and doing business in real estate earning a sum of Rs.30,000/- per month, died in an accident that took place on 04.11.2008. When he was driving a motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-49-Z-9074, he was hit by a van bearing Registration No.TN-49-V-3364 and he died on the spot. Alleging loss of dependency and loss of love and affection, the claimants filed a claim petition. 2. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.85,000/- as compensation with ...
D. John Paul Louis Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 5th respondent Secretary St.Jude's College, Thoothoor to submit necessary proposals forthwith to the 3rd respondent Joint Director of Collegiate Education regarding the payment of earned leave benefits, leave on private affairs benefits, arrears of salary from 28.03.2007 to 30.06.2007 in the revised pay scale, arrears of revised pension and other benefits on the basis of the revised pay scale viz., change in gratuity and commutation etc., to the petitioner and consequently direct the 3rd respondent Joint Director to sanction the aforesaid benefits to the petitioner within a reasonable time.) 1. Notice of motion has been ordered as early as on 29.11.2011. Though the Secretary, St.Jude's College, Thoothoor, Kanyakumari District has received notice from this Court and entered appearance on 20.01.2012 and represented by Mr.S.Murugaiyan and Mr.Gopalakr...
B. Panneer Selvam Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-12-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in his proceedings in D.Dis.No.66673/NGB II(2) 2009, dated 14.05.2009 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant taking into account of petitioner qualification as well as the length of service rendered by the petitioner and in the light of the judgment in State of Tripura and others vs. K.K.Roy reported in 2004(9) SCC 65.) 1. Challenge in this Writ Petition is to an order dated 14.05.2009 passed by the Director General of Police, Chennai, rejecting the request of the petitioner to consider his case for promotion to the post of Junior Assistant, on the grounds that there are no rules or regulations or promotional avenues for the post of Painter. In the ...
Vanitha Vs. the Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-12-2012
(Prayer: W.P.(MD)NO.1666 of 2012:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to sponsor the petitioner's name (Registration Number MDP 2006F00000105) to first respondent office to the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeon within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon ble Court.) Common Order 1. This common order shall dispose of W.P.(MD)Nos.1666, 2093, 1646, 374 and 375 of 2012, as common question of law and facts are involved. 2. For the sake of brevity, the facts are taken from W.P.(MD)No.1666 of 2012. 3. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners pray for issuance of Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the second respondent to sponsor the petitioners' name, to the first respondent, for being considered, for appointment to the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, within stipulated period, as may be fixed by this Court. 4. But, keeping in view the fact, that during the p...
Aalama Wood Works, Represented by Its Proprietor A. Paulraj Vs. the Ju ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-12-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the notice by the first respondent vide “TAMIL” dated 04.09.2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the second respondent to issue licence for Aalama Wood Works at 36/13, Ramapuram, Manikatti Pottal, Kanyakumari District.) 1. This writ petition has been filed to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the notice by the first respondent vide “TAMIL” dated 04.09.2012 and consequently, direct the second respondent to issue licence for Aalama Wood Works at 36/13, Ramapuram, Manikatti Pottal, Kanyakumari District. 2. Heard Mr.C.T.Perumal, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.A.U.Ramanathan, learned Counsel who takes notice for the first respondent, Mr.K.K.Senthilvelan, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India who takes notice for the second respondent, Mr.M.Alagathevan, learned Special ...
V. Ramalingam Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by Its Pri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose of the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner on 08.10.2007 within a time frame fixed by this Court.) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to dispose of the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner on 08.10.2007 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. Heard Mr.R.Subramanian, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.V.Muruganantham, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, Mr.K.Muraleedharan, learned Counsel appearing for the third respondent and Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent. 3. By consent, the writ petitions itself are taken up for final disposal. 4. The petitioner and the fourth respondent are the contesting parties. The third respondent - President of Kovil P...
M. Patturajan Vs. Rajeeranjan, the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation Dis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-07-2012
(Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondent for the wilful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.896 of 2012, dated 08.12.2012.) 1. Heard Mr.Patturajan, the petitioner appearing party-in-person and Ms.Srimathi learned Standing counsel for the Tamil Nadu Generation Distribution and Corporation Limited. 2. This contempt petition arose out of the orders passed by this Court in W.P(MD).No.896 of 2012 dated 08.02.2012. In that Writ Petition, the petitioner sought for a direction to settle his professional bills and consequently to pay a sum of Rs.3,20,000/- towards his legal fees. 3. It is stated by the petitioner that he has been engaged as a Special Counsel by the respondent Corporation and even after successfully completing the cases, when he claimed the bill, the respondents have not settled the bill. Hence, this Contempt Petition. 4. When the matter came up on 08.02.2012, this Court directed the Chairma...
Saroja Ammal and Another Vs. Valliammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-05-2012
(Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 25.06.1998 and made in A.S.No.16/1997 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 29.11.1996 made in O.S.No.298/1981, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai.) 1. The appellants/defendants have filed this Second Appeal as against the judgment and decree dated 25.06.1998 made in A.S.No.16/1997, on the file of the learned Principal Sub Judge, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 29.11.1996, made in O.S.No.298/1981, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Madurai. 2. The respondent/plaintiff has filed a suit seeking for the relief of declaration and recovery of possession and past damages of Rs.50/- per month from 12.12.1979 and also future damages at the rate of Rs.50/- per month. Briefly, the case of the respondent/plaintiff is that she purchased the suit property and other properties from one Ayyalu Naid...
S. Samayamuthu Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Home Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-05-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the case in Crime No.90 of 2012 on the file of the respondent No.5 and the complaint of the petitioner dated 09.02.2012, to be entrusted to the respondent No.4 for investigation of the case and file the final report before the Jurisdictional Magistrate within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The petitioner in this writ petition seeks for a direction to transfer the case in Crime No.90 of 2012 on the file of the 5th respondent viz., Inspector of Police, Oomachikulam Police Station, Oomathikulam, Madurai, on the basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 09.02.2012 and to entrust the case to the 4th respondent / Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and to file a final report before the Jurisdictional Magistrate within a stipulated time. 2. When the writ petition came up for admission on 21.02.2012, the learned Additional Advocate General took notice f...
T. Boopathi Raja Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District an ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Sep-05-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission for the P.K.Mookiah Thevar Death Anniversary programmes such as paying tributes at the Grave Yard at 5.00 am, procession at 4.00 pm and the public meeting at 6.00 pm in Usilampatti on 06.09.2012 and also to provide with adequate police protection.) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner claiming to be the Secretary of Piramalai Kallar Youth Federation at Usilampatti. 2. In this writ petition he has sought for a direction to consider his representation, dated 04.08.2012 addressed to the Superintendent of Police, Madurai. In that representation, he had stated that the Federation to which he belonged use to conduct Gurupooja in the memory of P.K.Mookiah Thevar, who was their leader, on 6th September of every year. During that day, they use to conduct a procession culminating in a public meeting. For the last 20 years,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »