Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Lakshmi Mills Company Limited, Rep. by Its General Manager Vs. the ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his Na.Ka.A1/27/2011 dated 14.06.2012 and quash the same.) ORDER R.BANUMATHI, J. 1. Challenging the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent issued under Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code in Na.Ka.No.A1/27/2011 dated 14.06.2012 calling upon the writ petitioner to remove the obstruction caused by the petitioner for smooth flow of sewage of flood water in S.No.81/2A1A1 of Inam Maniyachi village. 2.In order to appreciate the contentions raised, it is necessary to refer to the background facts. The sewage water accumulated in the town area of Kovilpatti has been running through many survey numbers in Kovilpatti town and finally through Town S.No.52 and enters in S.No.81/2A1A1 of Inam Maniyachi village and proceeded in between writ petitioner - Lakshmi Mills and the S...
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Represented by Its Chairman, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayers: Writ Appeal (MD)No.407 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6798 of 2012 on the file of this Court. Writ Appeal (MD)No.408 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6799 of 2012 on the file of this Court. Writ Appeal (MD)No.409 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6800 of 2012 on the file of this Court. Writ Appeal (MD)No.410 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 16.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6801 of 2012 on the file of this Court. Writ Appeal (MD)No.411 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6973 of 2012 on the file of this Court. Writ Appeal (MD)No.412 of 2012 filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 23.5.2012 passed in W.P.(MD)No.6974 of 20...
Augustine David Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Principa ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(COMMON PRAYER: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to award one mark to the petitioner for Question No.25 and Question No.10 of Part III Physics Examination respectively and consequently direct the fifth respondent to revise the petitioners' rank for admission to the M.B.B.S. course and admit them in the appropriate college as per the revised rank.) COMMON ORDER 1. Since the issue involved in both these writ petitions is one and the same, both the cases are taken up together for final disposal and a common order is being passed. 2. In both the writ petitions the challenge is to the answer given in respect of question No.25 (B series) and No.10 (A series) of Part III Physics Examination is wrong and thereby the petitioners have lost one mark for the questions. According to them, the question and the key answer is given as follows: In the photoelectric phenomenon if the ratio of the frequency ...
Punganoor Eri Pasana Vivasayigal Membattu Nala Sangam, Rep. by Its Sec ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: W.P.(MD)No.7924/2012: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondents to remove the encroachments, strengthen the bunds and erect boundary stones on all sides of the Punganoor and Kothamangalam Lakes situated at Manikandam Panchayat Union, Thiruvarangam, Tiruchirapalli District, within a time frame. W.P.(MD)No.8106 of 2012: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and the 4th Respondents to remove the debris and rubbish, which have been filled-up unlawfully in the middle of Kothamangalam Aerie, Punganoor Aerie and Kallikudi Aerie to accumulate and to store-up irrigation water through the reservoir from Kattalai Canal for agricultural operation of the ayacutdars.) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J) The common prayer in these two Public Interest Litigations is for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, dir...
Thangavel Vs. Kanagaraj and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(Prayer: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order dated 14.3.2012 made in IA.Nos.94 and 95/2012 in OS.No.521/2010 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur.) ORDER 1. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed against the order dated 14.3.2012 made in IA.Nos.94 and 95/2012 in OS.No.521/2010 by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Karur, dismissing those applications. 2. In brief the facts are that the Revision Petitioner as Plaintiff instituted a suit in OS.No.521/2010 against the Respondents/Defendants and others for partition and for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from creating any kind of encumbrance over the suit properties and further restraining the Defendants 9 to 25 from making any drenches and from raising any construction including basement etc. in the suit B-Schedule Property and also restraining them from ploughing the soil by using JCB Vehicles and dry the soil through heavy vehicles. An application for temporary injunction was a...
National Insurance Co.Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager, Trichy Vs. Nel ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-02-2012
(PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2000 made in MACT OP No.192 of 1998, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Nagercoil.) Is the widow who is expected by the society to live a life of austerity and abnegation, on remarriage is entitled to compensation in respect of death of her deceased husband is the issue to be decided. 2. The first respondent is the claimant who filed the petition for compensation claiming a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- in respect of death of her husband, impleading her father-in-law as the respondent, who is the sixth respondent herein. The claims Tribunal gave a finding that the accident took place due to the negligent driving of TATA Sumo Car and awarded a sum of Rs.5,28,000/- as compensation. 3. Challenging the finding on negligence, the quantum of compensation and the rate of interest, the insurance company has filed this appeal. 4. The appellant is the insurer of the TATA S...
T. Soundarajan Vs. Valiyammal
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 24.2.2011 made in IA.No.298/2009 in OS.NO.15/2005 by the Fast Tract Court NO.2, Trichy.) ORDER 1. In this Civil Revision Petition, the order passed by the learned Additional District Judge (FTC-II) Trichy dated 24.2.2011 has been challenged by the 2nd Defendant in OS.NO.15/2005 appointing an Advocate Commissioner for the purpose of getting an expert opinion by producing the disputed documents and other documents containing the admitted signature for comparison of the signature found in the disputed documents. 2. The facts very briefly are:- a. The Respondents 2 to 8 have instituted a suit in OS.NO.87/1994 on the file of the Sub Court, Tiruchirappalli which has been transferred and renumbered as OS.No.15/2005 on the file of Fast Tract Court No.2, Tiruchirappalli for partition of the suit properties into two equal shares and allot one such share to the Plaintiffs and for separate possession and also for rendition of a...
A. Manivannan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the third respondent in O.Mu.No.1493/Aaa 3/06 dated 5/1/2007 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to approve the appointment of the petitioner as Watchman with all consequential benefits from the date of appointment.) ORDER 1. The petitioner was appointed as a watchman in the fourth respondent Higher Secondary School, an aided School covered by the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Act, 1973 on 11/6/2004. He was appointed against the vacancy that arose due to the retirement of one Thiru. Ramasamy. 2. The School sent proposals on 28/3/2005 for approval of the appointment of the petitioner as Watchman. But the third respondent returned the proposal in the impugned order dated 5/1/2007 on the ground that filling up of the vacancies relating to non-teaching staff in ...
R. Murugadoss @ Murugan Vs. State Through the Sub Inspector of Police, ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to call for the entire records and quash the same in Crime No.38 of 2007 on the file of the respondent police (Sub-Inspector of Police, DCB Crime, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District).) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 praying to quash the First Information Report registered in Crime No.38 of 2007, pending on the file of the first respondent. 2. It is stated in the petition that the respondents 2 to 4 as complainants have given the First Information Report to the first respondent and the same has been registered in Crime No.38 of 2007 under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, wherein the petitioner has been shown as sole accused. Further it is stated in the petition that the respondents 2 to 4 have approached the petitioner only for getting post of cleaning labourers in a foreign country and further it is stated in t...
Andavar Kulandai and Others Vs. Radha (Died) and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-01-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 1.2.2012 made in unnumbered IA.No./2012 in OS.No.128/1997 by the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 1.2.2012 made in unnumbered IA.No./2012 in OS.No.128/1997 by the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam, rejecting the application filed under Order 3 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment of the proposed parties. 2. The Respondents 1 to 7 as Plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration and recovery of possession contending that Arumuga Pillai and Nagappa Pillai executed a trust deed dated 30.4.1951 dedicating the property for the family Deity Sri Muthuswami. The said Arumuga Pillai and Nagappa Pillai died. After the death of Arumuga Pilai, who had no issues, the heirs of Nagappa Pillai were the Trustees of Sri Muthuswami Deity. In the plaint, it is specifically stated that Nagappa Pillai had three sons, namely, Muthu Vel, the Defendants 1 and 2 and two daug...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »