Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devibala Rosa Bell W/O. S.A. SelestIn Vs. the Deputy Director of Healt ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to pass orders on the charge memo issued to the petitioner in Na.Ka.No.14077/A6/06 on the file of the respondent dated 10.10.2008 as early as possible and further direct the respondent to pass necessary orders for payment of the petitioner's increment dues, uniform allowances and Pongal Bonus by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.06.2012 by way of legal notice.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the respondent, to expedite the Departmental proceedings initiated on 10.10.2008, and to release the annual increments of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner joined the office of the Deputy Director of Health Services on 26.06.1985, as Multipurpose Health Worker. The petitioner was placed under suspension on 01.12.2006, on contemplated enquiry. Af...
M. Saravanan Vs. the Principal Secretary/ Special Commissioner of Inte ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-08-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the first respondent herein by his Proc.No.4625/EI-2/2012 dated 26/7/2012 and quash the same as illegal.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order of transfer dated 26/7/2012. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, transfer order is not challenged on the ground of mala fide or violation of any statutory provision of law. 3. The grounds of challenge are (i). his daughter is studying in X Standard (ii). That there some family difficulties (iii). mid-term transfer is not permissible. 4. In support of the prayer in the writ, the learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance from the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MADRAS and OTHERS Vs. O. KARUPPA THEV...
Dr. K.V. Dhanaraj S/O. K.N. Viswanathan Vs. the Engineer in Chief, (Bu ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-07-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the third and fourth respondents to implement the transfer order passed by the first respondent vide his letter No.S1(1)/20099/2012-55 dated 18.07.2012.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the third and fourth respondents, to implement the transfer order issued by the Engineer in Chief (Building) and the Chief Engineer (General) / First Respondent dated 18.07.2012. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Engineer in the year 1986 in the Public Works Department, and promoted as Assistant Executive Engineer in the year 2009. The petitioner was transferred vide Order No.S1(1)/20099/2012-55 dated 18.07.2012 from Anti Sea Erosion Sub Division, Nagercoil to Pazhayaru Basin Sub Division, Nagercoil, on administrative exigency of service. The petitioner could not take over the charge immediately in the new place of post...
Dr. M. Kaladevi W/O. N. Saravana Kumar Vs. the Directorate of Medical ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned diversion order dated 23/7/2012 in reference No.4868/P and D/2007 passed by the second respondent read with the relieving order dated 27/7/2012 in reference No.184/12 issued by the third respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to retain the petitioner in Singampunari.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order dated 23.07.2012 passed by the Joint Director of Medical and Rural Health Services and Family Welfare, Sivagangai, and consequential relieving order dated 27.07.2012 passed by the third respondent. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Surgeon (Dental) on recommendation of the Tami Nadu Public Service Commission on 04.05.2012. The petitioner, while working as Assistant Surgeon (Dental) at Government Hospital...
M. Ramesh Kumar S/O. M. Mariappan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the third respondent herein to permit the petitioner to participate in the Lateral Entry Counselling for the second year B.E.Computer Science group scheduled to be held on 07.08.2012 so as to enable the petitioner join in second year B.E. Computer Science group in any one of the Government or Government Aided or Self Financing Engineering Colleges.) ORDER 1. The petitioner completed Polytechnic Course in Computer Science in Register No.10508349 from Arasan Ganesan Polytechnic College, Sivakasi. 2. As per the Regulation of admission to B.E., course, the petitioner is eligible for admission in the second year B.E. course in the Government, Government Aided and Self-financing Engineering Colleges under the Lateral Entry Counselling. 3. The third respondent had issued advertisement in the newspaper, inviting application form for the Counselling for the admission...
icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited, by Its Manager Mumbai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed to issue suitable directions to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (MACT) Tirunelveli to entertain the execution petition in unnumbered EP.SR.No.2388/2012 in MCOP.No.161/ 2010.) 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 16.6.2012 made in in unnumbered EP.SR.No.2388/ 2012 in MCOP.No.161/2010 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (MACT) Tirunelveli, returning the application. 2. The 1st Respondent herein/claimant suffered injuries in the accident that had occurred on 1.3.2010 at about 21.30 hours in the Tirunelveli-Tiruchendur Main Road, in which the vehicle Honda Motor Cycle belonging to the 2nd Respondent herein was involved, which was insured with Petitioner Insurance Company. The 3rd Respondent herein is the driver of the vehicle. The Tribunal has allowed the claim petition and awarded a sum of Rs.1,06,550/- as total compensation with interest at 7.5 percent p.a. from the date of the claim petitio...
K.K. Ramesh Vs. the District Collector, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to take appropriate action on the free patta sites given to 18 persons or otherwise arrange any other place for the 18 persons to construct houses thereon.) ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J) 1. In this Writ Petition, filed as a public interest litigation, the petitioner seeks for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to take appropriate action on the free patta sites given to 18 persons or otherwise arrange any other place for the 18 persons to construct houses thereon. 2. Today, the Writ Petition is posed under the caption "for admissibility". When the Writ Petition is taken-up for hearing, the Petitioner, who appeared in person, submitted that he is withdrawing the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 3. In view of the submission and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition is ...
A. Govindarajan Vs. S. Karunanithi and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 30.09.2008 made in M.C.O.P. No.433 of 2002 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai.) JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by G.M.AKBAR ALI, J) 1. This Appeal is filed against the order of dismissal dated 30.09.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Court, Pudukkottai, in M.C.O.P.No.433 of 2002. 2. The appellant herein, who is represented by his mother and next friend, A.Shanmugavadivu, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District and Sessions Court, Pudukkottai, dated 30.09.2008 in M.C.O.P.No.433 of 2002, claiming compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident on 17.12.2011. 3. According to the appellant, he was a practicing Advocate with standing experience of 9 years and was earning not less than Rs.15,000/- per month from his profession and Rs.2...
Minor Subash Kailainathan S/O. Late Ganesan Rep. by Mother and Natural ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to forthwith sanction the educational loan to the petitioner through out the course on the basis of the loan application in September 2011 and consequential representation of the petitioner dated 08.02.2012 without any further delay.) ORDER 1. The petitioner is minor Subash Kailainathan represented by his mother. He lost his father in the year 1994, while he was only three months old child. With great difficulties, he passed +2 examinations during the academic year 2010-2011 and he secured 55% mark. In fact, he obtained 375 marks out of 500 marks in his SSLC. Due to family problems, he was not able to get higher marks in +2 examination and he obtained only 55% mark in +2 examination because of his poorness. He had got admission under Government quota in Sivaji College of Engineering and Technology in Kaniyakumari District in the counselling ...
Sevakkal and Another Vs. M. Valarmathi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
(Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and decree passed in MCOP No.1657 of 2006 dated 10.11.2008 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Madurai.) This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed in MCOP No.1657 of 2006 dated 10.11.2008 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.3), Madurai. 2. The first claimant is the wife and the second claimant is the daughter of the deceased-Karuppaiah, who filed a claim petition for compensation, claiming a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- in respect of the death of the deceased in an accident that took place on 08.07.2006. 3. The claim petition was filed against the owner and insurer of two lorries, bearing Registration Nos.TN-46-D-1741 (R1 and R2) and TN-28-E-7373 (R3 and R4). The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/- as compensation only on account of the loss of dependency and the second respondent- Insuranc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »