Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munisamy Vs. the General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporati ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorari to call for the records of the impugned show cause notice dated 4/7/2012 vide No.Sa.1/10/2/10 issued by the second respondent and quash the same.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the show cause notice dated 4/7/2012. 2. The petitioner was issued a charge memo on 16/6/2010 on the following charge. "That on 27/5/2010 you have scolded one Mr.A.Jayakanthan, the Assistant Engineer, T.S.No.20913 very filthily and preventing him from doing his duty thereby you have given way for complaint under Rule 16 (12) of the Corporation Standing Rules. If the above complaint proved then it is a misconduct that can be strictly punishable under the Standing Rules of the Corporation." 3. The petitioner denied the charge and a departmental enquiry was held. The Enquiry Officer found the petitioner guilty of charge. The competent a...
Nellai Mavatta Pokkuvarathu Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by Its General Se ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notification No.2033/CPD/OT/TNSTC/2012, issued by the respondent in the Daily Thanthi News paper on 06.04.2012, quash the same insofar as awarding of contract to carry out the 9 works mentioned in serial numbers 23,24,25,26,27,28,30,31 and 32 of the impugned tender notification and consequently direct the respondent not to alter the conditions of service of the workmen, who are now employed by the respondent to carry out 9 categories of work mentioned in the notification adversely without any settlement or award and without issuing notice U/S 94 of I.D. Act, award costs.) COMMON ORDER 1. These two writ petitions were filed by the two trade unions. In both writ petitions the claim is identical viz., two trade unions were aggrieved by the notification issued in the Daily Thanthi News paper on 06.04.20...
M. Ayyappan Vs. the Registrar, Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent in C.No.3248/Regr/Academic/A2/2009, dated 06.09.2010 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to publish the results of the petitioner pertaining to the final semester of III year degree in Bachelor of Law course held during May, 2009 and also directed to issue Transfer Certificate, Mark Statement, Conduct Certificate, Course Completion Certificate and Provisional Certificate to the petitioner, within a stipulated period as that may be fixed by this Court.) ORDER 1. This is a Writ Petition filed through Legal Aid. The petitioner herein is an HIV patient. He made an application for admission to one of the Government Colleges in the State of Tamil Nadu. The petitioner was given admission for the academic year 2006-2009 fo...
Durai Manamagil Mandram Rep. by Its Secretary T. Rajendhran Vs. the Su ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-13-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful functions of the petitioner's club without any complaint or due process of law.) ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction forbearing the respondents from interfering with the lawful functions of the petitioner's club without any complaint or due process of law. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner-club viz., Durai Manamagil Mandram is functioning in Karaiyampatti, Usilampatti Taluk, Madurai District, from December 2011 and registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act. The club was formed for serving the village people. It is conducting sports activities and functioning without any complaint. But, however, the Police are interfering with the day-to-day activities of the club. On 25.07.2012 a representation was sent by the petitioner to the respondent. A r...
G. Gnanasekaran Vs. the District Manager, Tasmac Limited, Madurai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the 1st respondent's proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1053/2012/H, dated 04.06.2012 and quash the same and forbearing the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respondents from in any way initiating any action to evict the petitioner illegally and unlawfully from the land measuring about 11 cents and situate in R.S.No.241/3, Madurai North Taluk at Aathikulam, wherein the petitioner have established a TASMAC Retail Shop bearing No.5132 and running an appended "Bar".) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ of certiorari, to quash the order Na.Ka.No.1053/2012/H, dated 04.06.2012 with a consequential relief of prohibition, restraining the respondents 1,2 and 3 from taking action to evict the petitioner illegally and unlawfully from the land measuring 11 cents situated in R.S.No.241/3, Madurai North Taluk at Aathikulam, where the peti...
B. Vijayakumar S/O. N. Balakrishnan Nair and Another Vs. the Tamil Nad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent, pertaining to its order in Letter No.4753/S4/2012, dated 29.06.2012, on its file and consequential order of the second respondent in No.TNMA/003/EST-/11-12 dated 30.06.2012 on his file and quash the same, directing the respondents to have the petitioner in his job in the first respondent academy in continuation of the same till 30.06.2012. ORDER The petitioner has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, with the following prayer:- “For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, any other writ, direction or order in the nature of a Writ, calling for the records of the first respondent, pertaining to its order in Letter No.4753/S4/2012 dated 29.06.2012 on its file and consequential order of the ...
Annai Indira Memorial College of Education, Rep. by Its Correspondent ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in respect of the impugned order issued by the 2nd respondent vide its proceedings in F.No.SRCAPP718 (2012-13) D.A.Ed (PA)/TN/2011-12/39274 dated 15.03.2012 and quash the same and direct the respondents especially the 2nd respondent to process the application of the petitioner dated 28.09.2011 submitted through online on 26.09.2011 by considering the compliance report of the petitioner dated 25.01.2012 for the grant of recognition to the petitioner institute for conducting B.Ed., degree course (Bachelor of Education) from the academic year 2012-13 within a time frame which may be fixed by this Court. ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order is an appealable under Section 18 of National Council for Teacher Education Act. Therefore, he prays of liberty of this Court to withdraw the writ petition to avail ...
V. Isabella Vs. the General Manager, Tamil Nadu Government State Expre ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent's proceedings in Lr.No.048912/Y10/PF/SETC 2011 dated 05.11.2011 and quash the same consequently directing the respondents herein to sanction the family pension to the petitioner on account of the death of her husband namely Issac John.) 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the order Letter No.048912/Y10/PF/SETC - 2011 dated 05.11.2011, in declining the family pension to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is the wife of Late Isaac John, who was working as a Conductor (EDP.No.2358) in Tamil Nadu State Express Corporation. The husband of the petitioner was discharged after completing 30 years of service. 3. The husband of the petitioner had married Suseela Rani on 10.04.1980, according to the Christian rites and Customs. Because of the misunderstanding between th...
K. Rajendran Vs. the General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpor ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to sanction pension benefits as per Rule 19 of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Rules and to refund the amount of Rs.12,549/- recovered from the petitioner as notice wages and to settle Rs.7,000/- paid under Employees Retirement Scheme.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to sanction pension under Rule 19 of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Rules and for refund of Rs.12,549/- (Rupees twelve thousand five hundred and forty nine only) recovered from the petitioner as notice wages as also to settle another sum of Rs.7,000/- (Rupees Seven thousand only) paid under Employees Retirement Benefits Scheme. 2. The petitioner was appointed on daily wage basis on 29/10/1998 as Junior Tradesm...
N.C. Anbu Selvam Vs. the District Collector, Madurai District and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-10-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to release the petitioner's Ashok Leyland HGV - Multi Axled Vehicle bearing Registration No.KA01-AC-3333 within the stipulated time.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to release the petitioner's Ashok Leyland HGV - Multi Axled Vehicle bearing Registration No.KA01-AC-3333. 2. The petitioner purchased the vehicle in question from Mr.Venkateswaran for the valuable consideration and got transferred all the relevant documents in his name. 3. The petitioner is using the vehicle for his personal use as well as for rental purpose to third parties. On 12/7/2012, at about 8 p.m., the Deputy Director of Geology, intercepted and seized the vehicle along with the driver on charge of carrying two granite stone without proper ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »