Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C. Mani Vs. the Regional Transport Authority, Kanniyakumari and Anothe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering or creating any trouble or problems in the operation of the petitioner's mini bus bearing Registration No.TN 31 T 8734 while plying from Melaperuvilai, Acharipallam, Medical College, Pallavilai and Vadacery Bus Stand and pass such further or other orders.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from interfering or creating any trouble or problems in the operation of the petitioner's mini bus bearing Registration No.TN 31 T 8734 while plying from Melaperuvilai, Acharipallam, Medical College, Pallavilai and Vadacery Bus Stand and pass such further or other orders as this Court deem it fit and proper in the circumstances given. 2. In support of the prayer in Paragraph No.5 of the affidavit, it is pleaded as under:- "5. I respectfully submit that the mini bus operation day by da...
Padmakumari Thankachi and Another Vs. the District Collector, Kanyakum ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the family pension arrears of the petitioner's mother Mrs.Vijayamma thankachi in our favour.) ORDER 1. The petitioners had approached this Court with a prayer for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to release the family pension to the petitioners. 2. The petitioners are the daughters of late Parameswaran Thambi, who worked as Clerk with the second respondent Municipality and attained supernnaution on 30.6.1960. He left behind his widow, Mrs.Vijayamma Thankachi, mother of the petitioners, who was granted family pension after the death of their father. 3. The case of the petitioners is that after the death of their mother, now the petitioners being daughters are entitled to the family pension, which the respondents have not released, inspite of demand. 4. It is not disputed that the petitioners are aged more tha...
A.V. Meeran Mydeen Vs. A. Shahul Hameed and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 06.07.2012 passed in I.A.No.606 of 2012 in O.S.No.637 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil.) ORDER The respondents have filed a suit in O.S.No.637 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Nagercoil, for the following reliefs: (a) A decree be given declaring that the plaintiffs are the members of the first defendant Jamaath, entitled to all the benefits, rights guaranteed under its bye-law and the subsequent resolutions and decisions of the general body and executive committee of the first defendant Jamaath. (b) An injunction be granted restraining the defendants, other office bearers, their men and persons claiming under them from interfering in availing the services of lebbais, modiers, and other in the functions held in the plaintiff's house and from interfering in the rights and privileges of the plaintiffs as members of the trust. 2. I...
M. Sanjay Gandhi Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's vehicle Tractor bearing Registration No.TN-49-AF-8788 with Trailer within a stipulated time.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to release the petitioner's Tractor bearing Registration No.TN-49-AF-8788 with Trailer, within a time frame. 2. It is the admitted case of the petitioner that FIR in Crime No.29 of 2012 is registered for the offence under Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and Section 379 of Indian Penal Code, against the petitioner's brother. It is also not in dispute that the respondent No.2 impounded the vehicle in the crime. Once the case under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 21 of Mines Act has been registered, and the matter is pending in the Court of the Judicial Magistra...
P. Sivakami Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by Its Secretary to Gover ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus calling for the entire records connected with the detention order of the Respondent No.2, in A.Me.Ku.Manthanam No.35/2012, dated 27.04.2012, quashing the same and consequently setting the detenu P.Saravanakumar @ Saravanaperumal @ Vellaiyan @ Saravanan, 24/12) now confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai, at liberty.) (M.M.SUNDRESH, J) 1. The Petitioner, who is the mother of the detenu, who has been detained under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot-leggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum-grabbers and Video Pirates Act 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982), has come forward to file this Writ Petition to quash the detention order, dated 27.04.2012, issued by Respondent No.2. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner would submit that the detention order is liable to be quashed, as there is an une...
Tamizhaga Panchalai Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by Its General Secretary ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the firstrespondent to the order dated 03.12.2004 passed by the first respondent in I.A.No.80 of 2004 in I.D.No.116 of 1999 and quash the same consequently direct the 1st respondent to dispose of the I.D on merits.) ORDER The petitioner union has raised a dispute against the punishment of suspension imposed by the management of Saravana Spinning Mills Ltd., against three workmen and the issue has been referred for adjudication by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.884, dated 05.10.1999 and it has been taken on file, by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Thiruchirapalli as I.D.No.116 of 1999. The workmen have been represented by a counsel. On 20.02.2004 the matter has been dismissed for default, for non appearance. According to the petitioner, the Advocate Clerk has wrongly noted down the date, as 27.02.2004 instead of 20.02....
E. Maria Joseph Vs. the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Mad ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records leading to the order issued by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.2877/2012SaPA, dated 29.06.2012, quash the same and direct the respondent to take on file the revision petition, dated 21.02.2011.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order, dated 29.06.2012, passed by the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, dismissing the revision petition filed under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act by the petitioner. 2. The petitioner was appointed at Madurai Southern Railway Staff Co-operative Stores Ltd., Madurai, as a watchman/Weighter on 01.07.1998. The petitioner was appointed on daily wage of Rs.100/- per day. Subsequently, the petitioner was placed in the consolidated wages of Rs.750/- per month. The service of the petitioner was confirmed under the statutory sett...
S. Muthusamy S/O. M. Sanmugavel thevar Vs. the Secretary, Government o ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2012, regarding Employment Assistant, on account of land acquisition in view of the G.O.Ms.No.656 Labour and Employment Department dated 29.06.1978.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider his representation dated 30.05.2012 regarding Employment Assistant, on account of acquisition of his land, in view of G.O.Ms.No.656 Labour and Employment Department dated 29.06.1978. 2. The writ, as framed is not maintainable. Writ of Mandamus can be issued when the petitioner has a legal right and the respondents have corresponding legal duty to redress the grievances. The representation is in the nature of Notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code, and thus a pre-requisite before coming...
J. Sahaya Kalaiarasi W/O. Edwinson Vs. the Superintendent, Central Pri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-14-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to grant emergency leave for a period of six weeks to the petitioner's husband by name Edwinwon, S/o.Nicholas, who is being confined at Central Prison, Palayamkottai, Tirunelveli Dsitrict as a life convict pursuant to the judgment passed by the learned II Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli in S.C.No.209 of 1996 vide his judgment dated 22.03.2002.) ORDER 1. The petitioner is the wife of one Edwinson S/o.Nicholas, who is a life convict and lodged in Central Prison, Palayamkottai. The petitioner's husband was convicted and sentenced by the II Additional Sessions Court, Tirunelveli vide judgment dated 22.03.2002 in S.C.No.209 of 1996. Subsequently, he has filed an appeal before this Court in C.A.No.519 of 2012. By virtue of grant of bail in CMP.No.4832 of 2004 in C.A.No.519 of 2002, he was enlarged on bail. However, the said appeal was dis...
The Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, TuticorIn and Another Vs. M ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-14-2012
(Prayer: Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order passed by this Court in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.6961 of 2012 dated 19.06.2012.) (P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA, J.) 1. The writ appeal is filed against the order passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.6961 of 2012 dated 19.06.2012. 2. The respondent herein is the proprietor of M/s.Empire Exports, West Bengal and is engaged in the import and export of spices, betel-nuts and condiments for the past 15 years. For the purpose of conduct of the business, the respondent herein has been allotted Import and Export Code by the Office of the JDGFT, Kolkata in No.0296007328. The respondent imported 53,592 Kgs of split betel-nuts with declared CandF value of Rs.8,42,198.28 and 36,480 Kgs of whole betel-nuts with declared CandF value of Rs.5,73,282.20 from Bangladesh. The supplier of the goods was one M/s.Tara Export Corporation, Mongla, Bangladesh. The goods were invoice...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »