Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. Saraswathi Vs. the District Collector, District Collectorate Office ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay damages to the petitioner to the tune of Rs.5,00,000/- for the death of her son Prasanth caused by the multiple grievous injuries sustained by him due to collapse of entrance arch of the Valadi Panchayat Office, Trichy.) ORDER 1. Today, a poor and illiterate mother appeared in Court along with her counsel. She has lost her 12 year old son studying in standard VII, in Keelavaladi Government High School, on account of the collapse and fall of an arch/wall of the Panchayat Office. She has claimed compensation of Rs.5,00,000/-. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that on 14.08.2004, about 11.45 a.m., her son was at the library in Valadi Panchayat Office and when he was coming out, the entrance arch/wall of the Panchayat Office collapsed and fell on her minor son Prasanth, which caused multiple injuries and he died on account of the same. It is th...
Srivilliputhur Bar Association Rep. by Its Secretary, T. Rasaiah Vs. t ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pursuant to the impugned order passed by the fifth respondent in Proceedings dated 14.08.2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to permit the petitioner Bar Association to conduct a rally and Meeting on 17.08.2012 or any other subsequent date in Srivilliputhur Town, Virudhunagar District as mentioned in the representation dated 13.08.2012.) ORDER 1. The petitioner in this writ petition is Srivilliputhur Bar Association represented by its Secretary. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the fifth respondent namely the Inspector of Police, Krishnankovil Police Station, in charge of Srivilliputhur Town Police Station, Srivilliputhur, dated 14.08.2012. 3. It transpires that the petitioner Bar Association sent a letter dated 13.08.2012 to the fifth respondent asking permission ...
P. Muthuponnu Vs. the District Collector Madurai District and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.29813/2012/Sa.Vu.Thi.1 dated 13/7/2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to appoint the petitioner for the post of Noon Meals Cooker in Madurai West Panchayat Union Middle School, Thenur, madurai District.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order in Na.Ka.No.29813/2012/Sa.Vu.Thi.1 dated 13/7/2012, ordering appointment of the fourth respondent as Noon Meal Cook at Madurai West Panchayat Union Middle School, Thenur, Madurai District. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner was married in the year 2010 with one Pavunraj according to Hindu Marriage Rites and Ceremonies. Out of their wedlock, one male child was born. The husband of the petitioner died on...
A. Logirajan Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Dindigul
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-21-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the respondent in O.R.No.115/2005-2006, dated 20.03.2006, quash the same.) ORDER 1. Being aggrieved by the proceedings in O.R.No.115/2205-2006, dated 20.03.2006, of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, (Roving Squad), Dindigul, the respondent herein, directing the petitioner to pay a tax of Rs.5,36,250/- or to furnish a security for a value of Rs.18,00,000/- in the form, prescribed under Rule 35(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as "TNGST Rules") for not remitting the Entry Tax at 13% under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990, before 20.09.2005, to the Commercial Tax Officer II, Theni, the petitioner has come forward with the present writ petition. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a contractor, engaged in small civil construction works. He ...
M/S. Leo Enterprises, Rep. by Its Proprietor V. Ambalal Vs. the Commis ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from further detaining the Imported goods i.e., 2320 sheets (40 pallets) of Medium Density Fiber Board covered under Bill of Entry No.7025782/06.06.2012. ORDER 1. M/s. Leo Enterprises has invoked the extra ordinary equitable Jurisdiction of this Court, with a prayer for issuance of a Writ, in the nature of Prohibition, to restrain the respondents, from further detaining the Imported goods i.e., 2320 sheets (40 pallets) of Medium Density Fiber Board covered under Bill of Entry No.7025782/06.06.2012. 2. The petitioner is in the business of Import Trade and Local Trade of plywood sheets, Fiber Boards etc., and has been allotted an IEC for conducting import business by the Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, Zonal Office, Chennai, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Government of India. 3. The petitioner, in the course of business entered into High Se...
Saradha Ramachandran Vs. the Regional Transport Authority Cum District ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to transfer existing vehicle of Saradha Road lines along with the permit for the route from Embal to Elankurichi to the name of the petitioner and her mother Akilandam in the place of her father K.Yagnasubramanian.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.1 to transfer the existing vehicle of Saradha Road lines along with the permit of the route from Embal to Elankurichi to the name of the petitioner and her mother Akilandam in the place of her father, K.Yagnasubramanian. 2. The Writ Petition as framed is not competent. It is the case of the petitioner that before transferring the route permit, the competent authority is to hold an enquiry under Section 82 read with Rule 211 of the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Act and Rules. It is also the case of the petitioner that an application has been ...
Thiruvengadathan Vs. the Chairman, Administrative Office, Pandiyan Gra ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned charge memo in AIVD/V/334/12-13 dated 27.4.2012 and impugned letter in Personnel Administration Department/PAD/04/2012-13 dated 28.4.2012 passed by the respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to pay all retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner within a stipulated time.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari to quash the Charge Memo dated 27.4.2012 issued for violating Regulations 18 and 20 of the Pandyan Grama Bank Staff (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations 2010, which is punishable as per Regulation 39(1)(b) of the said Service Regulations. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned charge memo on the ground that the charge sheet was issued to the petitioner 2 days prior to the date of attaining the age of superann...
V.O. Jose Vs. the Secretary to Government, Mines and Minerals, Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents and their men from preventing the petitioner from transporting blue metal, blue metal chips, dust, bricks, hollow blocks from Tamil Nadu to Kerala through Puliyarai Check post at Senkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District and Kaliakkavilai and Padanthalumoodu check post at Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with a prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus, to forbear the respondents and their men from preventing the petitioner from transporting blue metal, blue metal chips, dust, bricks, hollow blocks from Tamil Nadu to Kerala through Puliyarai Check post at Senkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District and Kaliakkavilai and Padanthalumoodu check post at Vilavancode Taluk, Kanyakumari District. 2. In support of the petition, the petitioner had not placed any documents showing that h...
A. P. Vijayakumar S/O. A. Ponnusamy Vs. the Agricultural Production Co ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent in his proceedings No.Roc.A/3667/2001 dated 06.09.2001 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in Government service subject to the outcome of the criminal case pending against him.) ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that this writ petition may be disposed of, by directing the respondents, to decide the Appeal filed by the petitioner, against refusal of respondents, to revoke the order of suspension. The petitioner is under suspension since 2001, whereas his co-accused has not only reinstated, but also promoted, and other co-accused was allowed to retire on attaining the age of superannuation. 2. In view of the stand taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the first respondent, to disp...
M.R. Kannan Vs. the Director General of Police, Chennai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-17-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to include the petitioner's name in the 2003-2004 seniority list of Police Constable Grade II on the strength of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1086 of 2007 dated 13.12.2007 based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.3.2012 in accordance with law within the period stipulated by this Court.) ORDER 1. The petitioner prays for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to include the petitioner's name in the 2003-2004 seniority list of Police Constable Grade II on the strength of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1086 of 2007 dated 13.12.2007 based on the petitioner's representation dated 24.3.2012 in accordance with law. 2. The operative portion of the judgement passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1086 of 2007 reads as under:- "7. In the light of the certificate issued by the Orthopeadician o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »