Chennai Madurai Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Sankaranarayanan Vs. the District Collector, Virudhunagar and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to provide adequate permission and protection to the petitioner and their community members to worship and celebrate the Pongal festival at Arulmigu Muthalamman Thirukoil, T.Karisalkulam, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District on 15.08.2012 and 16.08.2012.) ORDER 1. The petitioner has come forward to file the present writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to provide permission and adequate protection to the petitioner and his community members to worship and celebrate Pongal Festival at Arulmigu Muthalamman Thirukoil, T.Karisalkulam, Sivakasi Taluk, Virudhunagar District, on 15.08.2012 and 16.08.2012. 2.The writ petition came up for admission on 10.08.2012 and on that day, this Court directed the learned Additional Government Pleader to take notice for the respondents 1 to 4 and in respect of the private res...
Ramesh Babu Vs. the Controller of Examination, Tamil Nadu M.G.R. Medic ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
(Prayer: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to allow the petitioner to complete the Course of P.G. in D.A. (Diploma in Anesthesia) within the Academic year (2007-2009). 1. An in-service M.B.B.S. Doctor has applied for admission to Post Graduate Diploma in Anesthesia (DA) for the academic year 2007-2008. He has been admitted to Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur. According to the petitioner, he has been regular in attending the classes. However, owever, due to illness, for some period, he did not attend the classes, for which he has produced medical certificate to the Head of the Department. The petitioner has further submitted that due to some internal departmental problems between the Heads of the Departments, the Medical Certificate produced by him was wantonly not produced by the Head of the Department (Anesthesia) Mr. Dr. Muthukumaran to the college office. Practical e...
M.K. Sahul Hameed and Another Vs. N. Abdul Hug and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-28-2012
(Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order, dated 12.11.2007 made in W.O.P.No.1 of 2000 on the file of the Principal Sub-Court, (Wakf Tribunal), Dindigul.) Common Order: Both Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Dindigul (Wafk Tribunal), in W.O.P.No.1 of 2000, dated 12.11.2007. 2. The first CRP viz. C.R.P(NPD)(MD).No.1616 of 2008 was admitted on 28.08.2012. Pending CRP, interim injunction was granted initially for a period of two weeks and subsequently, extended from time to time till 27.11.2008. During the pendency of the said CRP, since the 2nd respondent passed away, the legal heir has been brought on record viz. 5th respondent. 3. The 3rd respondent in the WOP, viz., the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, through its Executive Officer-cum-Secretary, also filed another CRP in C.R.P.(NPD)(MD).No.2009 of 2008. In that CRP, notice was ...
K. Murugan Vs. Central Empowered Committee, New Delhi and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-28-2012
(PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, praying to call for the records pertaining to the impugned proceedings of the Respondent No.4 vide Letter No.Eee Mee Po/V/Pudur/Ko.Kattu/A.No.124/2012 dated 30.04.2012 on the file of the Respondent No.4, against the Electric Connection No.389-004-826 TF-III, Pudur and to quash the same as illegal and to direct the Respondent No.3 to grant the license in favour of the petitioner.) ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the notice issued by the Junior Engineer, Distribution, TNGEDCO, Pudur dated 30.04.2012. 2. By the impugned proceedings, the petitioner was informed that as per the orders of the Supreme Court in the case known as Godawarman Thirumalpad case, if the petitioner fails to get appropriate licence from the Forest Authority, the power connection given to the petitioner would be disconnected without any further instruction. Challenging the s...
Murugiah Kandyar Vs. the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-27-2012
(PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to count the Hundiyals and other incomes to Arulmighu Muthumariamman Temple, Narthamalai, Kulathoor Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the presence of Tahsildar, Kulathoor and Nattu Ambalam.) ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to count the Hundiyals and other income of Arulmighu Muthumariamman Temple, Narthamalai, Kulathoor Taluk, Pudukkottai District in the presence of Tahsildar, Kulathoor and Nattu Ambalam and to pass appropriate orders. 2. The petitioner claims himself to be a Nattu Ambalam otherwise known as 'Miras' of Sathyamangalam Village. The grievance of the petitioner was that the said temple has not been proceeded with proper amenities. Even though the devotees belonged to the temple are in large numbers, there was no electricity supply during the festival of this year and the...
Tiruchuli Hindu Nadar Uravinmurai Society, Rep by Its Secretary, A.P. ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-27-2012
(Prayer: PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.5396 of 2012: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order of appointment of the third respondent dated 09.03.2011 issued by the second respondent and consequential approval order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Ne.Mu.No.1451/A2/2011, dated 06.06.2011 and quash the same. PRAYER in W.P.(MD)No.10747 of 2012: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 10.04.2012 sent by the petitioner and take appropriate action against the fourth respondent and pass further orders.) COMMON ORDER 1. In both the Writ Petitions, the petitioner is a Uravinmurai Society of Tiruchuli Hindu Nadar, which is a registered Society with Registration No.84 of 2000. The deponent of the affidavit claims to be the Secretary of...
idol of Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy, Rep. by Joint Commissioner, Trichir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-27-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to take action on the illegal construction of the 3rd respondent at T.S.No.2297, Door No.168, Mela Chithirai Street, Srirengam, Trichy.) ORDER 1. The petitioner in this case is Idol of Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy represented by the Joint Commissioner/Executive Officer, Arulmigu Ranganatha Swamy Thirukoil, Srirengam. 2. In the writ petition the petitioner/temple sought for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take action against the 3rd respondent in proceeding with the illegal construction at T.S.No.2297, Door No.168, Mela Chithirai Street, Srirengam. 3. When the matter came up on 24.07.2012, this Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim injunction. Subsequently, the name of the 1st respondent / District Collector being a party to the writ petition, has been deleted and the writ petition was dismissed as against the 1st ...
K. Lakshmipathy Vs. the Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records from the file of the 1st respondent herein in C.No.C1/49305/2011 and to quash the order dated 02.12.2011 passed therein.) ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the order passed by the 1st respondent / Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, dated 02.12.2011. 2. In the impugned order the 1st respondent has stated that the case in Cr.No.205/2011 on the file of the Kovilpatti West Police Station filed under various provisions of IPC and Indian Arms Act, has been investigated by the Inspector of Police, Kovilpatty West Police Station and he filed the charge sheet before the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kovilpatty on 10.08.2011. Further, the offences, under which the investigation was madem, were under Section 120(b), 294(b), 406, 420, 506(ii) IPC r/w 35 IPC and 25(i)(A) of Indian Arms Act. The final report has not been taken...
P. Manickam and Another Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the first respondent herein in M.C.No.5642/2012/A4, dated 03.08.2012, quash the same and consequently, direct the second respondent herein to maintain the sit out in question as referred in the schedule of the property of the impugned proceedings.) ORDER 1. In this case, the petitioners have come forward to challenge a preliminary order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Usilampatti, dated 03.08.2012. The said order came to be passed in terms of Section 133(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The property that is described is an elevated platform put up in the Grama natham poramboke in Mekkilarpatti coming under Usilampatti Taluk. The Revenue Divisional Officer, exercising her power under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Proce...
M. Poominathan Vs. the State Election Commissioner, Koimbedu and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in proceedings e.f.m3 /1118/11 dated 14.05.2012 and to quash the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondents to conduct the fresh enquiry as per the direction of this Court.) ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner who is a ward member of T.Punaivasal Village Panchayat, Kamuthi Panchayat Union, Ramanathapuram District, seeks to set aside the impugned order, dated 14.05.2012, passed by the Returning Officer, Kamuthi. 2. The said impugned notification was issued on the basis of the communication received from the State Election Commissioner, dated 11.05.2012 and a direction was issued to conduct election in respect of the vacant posts on 22.05.2012. Hence, the members of the panchayat are informed about the election. 3. The petitioner on receipt of the said impugned...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »