Central Information Commission Cic Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.V K Bodyal Vs. Mcd, Gnct Delhi
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002280/15122 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002280 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. V K Badyal, A-42, Shyam Enclave, Street No. 2, Deenpur, Najafgarh, New Delhi -110043. Mr. Kamal Singh Deemed PIO & EE(MIV) Municipal Corporation of Delhi O/o The EE(M-IV), Najafgarh Zone, Overhead Water Tank, Najafgarh, New Delhi 20-07-2011 21-07-2011 20-07-2011 Not ordered 05-08-2011Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order of Second Appeal received on S. No. 1. 2.: : : : :Information sought. What are the norms of MCD for the approval for such work? What is the status of the said approval?3. 4. 5. 6. 7.The PIO reply. All the norms of development in unauthorized colonies are uploaded by urban development deptt. On their web site. www,ud.delhigovt. nic. As per the new list of UD/UC...
Mr.Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs. Mcd, Gnct Delhi
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002297/15132 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002297 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, F-2/94, Sector-16, Rohini, Delhi-110089. Mr. M. P. Gupta PIO & SE-II Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Rohini, Zone, Sector-5, Rohini, Delhi-110085. 01/03/2011 1. 21/03/2011 2. 11/04/2011 3. 24/04/2011 27/04/2011 30/05/2011 23/08/2011Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order of Second Appeal received on:: : :Information Sought: 1. The appellant is describing some plots and wards of sector 16 and 17 in which he is seeking some information about the action taken on unauthorized work done on the land issued for the Building Plan since January 1, 2009 to till date. 2. Give information about the name and post of the J.E., A.E., & E.E responsible for such violation. 3....
Mr.Prasidh Kumar Vs. East Central Railway
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000693 Complainant : Mr Prasidh Kumar Editor Ankhon Dekhi Gram Babuchak Post Mohdpur Khagol Distt. Patna. The Public Information Officer East Central railway Danapur Division Danapur. Dated : 11.10.2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 7.3.11 from Mr Prasidh Kumar against the PIO, East Central Railway, Danapur Division under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 25.10.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO East Central Railway, Danapur is directed as follows: a) In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the ...
Mr.a Ramanathan Vs. Ministry of Agriculture
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931Case No. CIC/SS/A/2011/000856 Name of Appellant Name of Respondent Date of Hearing : Shri A. Ramanathan: Ministry of Agriculture Department of Agriculture & Cooperation : 10.10.2011 ORDERShri A. Ramanathan, the appellant has filed this appeal dated 4.3.2011 before the Commission against the decision of FAA, Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, New Delhi for not providing the required information to his RTI-request dated 16.12.2010. The matter came up for hearing on 10.10.2011. The appellant was absent, whereas the respondent were represented by Shri J.C. Bain, Deputy Secretary, Dr. Ramesh Kumar, Deputy Commissioner and Shri H.P. Singh, Law Officer. 2. The appellant filed an RTI-application dated 16.12.2010 seeking the followinginformation: Whether Potassium Chloride (Technical Grade) IS 4150 falls und...
Mr.Harsh Kumar Mishra Vs. Ministry of Shipping,road Transport and High ...
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information CommissionRoom No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi 110067 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC/SS/A/2011/001192 Name of Appellant Name of Respondent : : Mr. Harsh Kumar Mishra National Highway Authority of India ORDER The Commission has received an appeal dated 27.6.2011 from Mr. Harsh Kumar Mishra u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against National Highway Authority of India stating that the first-appellate authority has not decided his first-appeal dated 24.3.2011 pertaining to his RTI-request dated 10.2.2011. 2. Perused the documents submitted by the Appellant. It is observed that Appellants RTI-request dated 10.2.2011 was replied to by CPIO, National Highway Authority of India, Kanpur vide letter dated 8.3.2011. 3. The Appellant filed his first-appeal on 24.3.2011 before AA, National Highway Authority of India, Lucknow which was not decided by AA. 4. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 19 and 18 of the RTI...
Mr.Manoj Kumar Dubey Vs. East Central Railway,mahendraghat, Patna
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000668 Complainant : Shri Manoj Kumar Dubey C/o Shalender Nath Post Takia Bazar Distt Rohtas Sasaram, Bihar. The Public Information Officer Main Admn Officer East Central Railway Mahendraghat Patna. Dated : 11.10.2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 28.2.11 from Shri Manoj Kumar Dubey against the PIO,Main Admn Officer, East Central Railway, Mahendraghat, Patna under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 6.7.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO Main Admn Officer, East Central Railway, Mahendraghat, Pat...
Mr.Devendra Kumar Bhargava Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campusds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/001095 Dated :11 October 2011 Complainant : Shri Devander Kumar Bhargava H.No.141, near mata chowk Kutubpur Rewari 123 401 Haryana The Public Information Officer North Western Railway Divisional Railway Managers Office Bikaner Division Bikaner Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 3.3.11 from Shri Devander Kumar Bhargava against the PIO, North Western Railway, Bikaner under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated dt.17.6.10 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO a)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant t...
Mr.Ravinder Kumar Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campusds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/001058 Dated :11 October 2011 Complainant : Shri Ravindra kumar S/o Sri Ram Lakhan Sao Old Jakkanpur (Near at South West Corner of DVC) PO GPO Patna The Public Information Officer Northern Railway Headquarter Office Baroda House New Delhi Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated Nil from Shri Ravindra Kumar against the PIO, Northern Railway HQ, New Delhi under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated dt.13.12.10 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO a)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his RTI request dated 13...
Mr.Mahesh Parsad Vs. Ministry of Coal
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931 Case No. CIC/SS/A/2011/001277 Name of Appellant Name of Respondent : : Mr. Mahesh Prasad Central Coalfields Limited ORDER The Commission has received an appeal dated 9.4.2011 from Mr. Mahesh Prasad u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against the Central Coalfields Limited stating that the first-appellate authority has not decided his first-appeal dated 22.2.2011 pertaining to his RTI-request dated 3.1.2011. 2. Perused the documents submitted by the Appellant it is observed that Appellants RTI-request dated 3.1.2011 was replied to by PIO, Central Coalfields Limited vide letter dated 24.1.2011. 3. The Appellant filed his first-appeal dated 22.2.2011 before AA, General Manager, Central Coalfields Limited, Jharkhand which was not decided by AA. 4. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals ...
Mr.D Raja Gopal Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campusds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/001057 Dated :11 October 2011 Complainant : Shri D. Rajagopal 3, 19, NGO Colony Vadapalani Chennai 600 026 The Public Information Officer Southern Railway General Managers Office Chennai 600 003 Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 10.3.10 from Shri D. Rajagopal against the PIO, Southern Railway, Chennai under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated dt.21.10.09 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO a)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his RTI request dated 21.10.09 CPIO should furnish a reply to the compl...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »