Skip to content

Central Information Commission Cic Court October 2011 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 12 2011

Mr.Suresh Chand Yadav Vs. Mcd, Gnct Delhi

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002327/15155 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002327 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Suresh Chand Yadav, Auto Workshop, (MCD), Jhilmil Colony, Sahadra, Delhi-110095 Mr. R. B. Tomar PIO & AC DEMS Head Office, MCD, O/o The Assistant Commissioner, Dr. Ambedkar Stadium, Delhi Gate, New Delhi-110002. 28/05/2011 Not Received. 23/06/2011 Not received. 26/08/2011. Respondent :RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order of Second Appeal received on: : : :The appellant has enclosed the RTI, the First Appeal, and the Hearing Notice (dt.-09/08/2011) Information Sought: The appellant is seeking information about his promotion as he describes it in several letters received to him from MCD. The PIO Reply The PIO did not reply to the appellant. Grounds for the First Appeal: No. reply was give...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Rajeev Sharma Vs. Directorate of Education, Gnct, Delhi

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

In the Central Information Commission at New Delhi CIC/SG/A/2011/001658 CIC/SG/A/2011/001657 Date of Hearing: Sep 13, 2011 Date of Decision: Oct 12, 2011 Parties: Appellant Shri Rajeev Sharma H.No.E/358(A) Mandir Marg Chhajjupur Shahdara Delhi 110 032The Applicant was present in personRespondents1. The Public Information Officer Directorate of Education O/o the Dy. Director of Education District West A Karampura New Moti Nagar New Delhi2. The Appellate Authority, Directorate of Education O/o the Dy. Director of Education District West A Karampura New Moti Nagar New DelhiRepresented by: Shri Rakesh Saxena, Accountant, S/ Guide Shri Rajiv Sharma, EM, S/Guide Shri Ka...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Ram Das Singh Vs. Ministry of Railways

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000856 Complainant : Shri Ram Das Singh 172C, Azad Square South Malanka Allahabad (UP) The Public Information Officer Personnel Officer M/o Railway, Railway Board Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road New Delhi. Dated : 12.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 11.4.11 from Shri Ram Das Singh against the PIO, Personnel Officer, M/o Railway, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 22.12.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO Personnel Officer, M/o Railways, Railway Boa...


Oct 12 2011

Shri. Tamal Kumar Roy Vs. Eastern Coalfields Limited

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

Central Information Commission Room No. 305, 2nd Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi110066 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26167931Case No. CIC/AT/A/2010/001105/SS Name of Appellant Name of Respondent Date of Hearing : : : Shri Tamal Kumar Roy Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Burdwan 21.09.2011 ORDER Shri Tamal Kumar Roy, the appellant has filed this appeal dated 26.10.2010 before the Commission against Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Burdwan for not providing information to his RTI-request dated 16.6.2010. The matter came up for hearing on 21.09.2011 through videoconferencing. The appellant was absent, whereas the respondents were represented by Shri Tapan Moitra, CPIO at NIC Videoconferencing Facility Centre, Burdwan. 2. The appellant filed an RTI-application dated 16.6.2010 seeking information oneleven queries pertaining to service matters. The CPIO vide letters No. ECL/HQ/RTI/ID85/10-11/794 dated 14.7.2010 replied to the appellant on Point No. 1 to 10 that the matter h...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs. Reserve Bank of India

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000800/14655Adjunct Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/000800 Complainant : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Gupta Human Rights Safety Council, 100 Industrial Area A, Ludhiana-141003 Mr. B. B. Thareja CPIO Punjab National Bank, Dalamal House, 11th Floor, JL Bajaj Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 Mr. R. P. Ghodnadikar CPIO Export Credit & Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd. Express Towers, 10th floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021Respondent(1):Respondent(2):Facts arising from the Complaint: The Complainant had filed a RTI application with the APIO, Reserve Bank of India, Industrial & Export Credit Department, Central Office, Mumbai on 05/09/2009 asking for certain information. On not having received any information within the mandated time the Complainant filed a Complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued ...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Girish Prasad Gupta Vs. Ministry of Railways

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000854 Complainant : Shri Girish Prasad Gupta GramShokhara 02, Rajendra Path Berani Post Baroni Distt Begusarai Bihar. The Public Information Officer Dy.Sr.Divl.Personnel Officer East Central Railway Sonpur Division Sonpur, Saran. Dated : 12.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 11.4.11 from Shri Girish Prasad Gupta against the PIO, Dy.Sr.Divl.Personnel Officer, East Central Railway, Sonpur under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 28.12.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO Dy.Sr.Divl.Personn...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Ashok Kumar Vs. Ministry of Railways

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000831 Complainant : Shri Ashok Kumar Pratap Nagar Baihrana Rae Bareilly Uttar Pradesh. The Public Information Officer Northern Railway Lucknow Division Lucknow. Dated : 12.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 6.4.11 from Shri Ashok Kumar against the PIO, Northern Railway, Lucknow Division under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 12.11.2010 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO Northern Railway, Lucknow Division, Lucknow is directed as follows: a) In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his RTI ...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.K Sathya Narayana Sharma Vs. Corporation Bank

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01616/SG/15156 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01616/SG Appellant : Mr. K. Sathyanarayana Sharma 17-A AD Block, Shalimar Bagh Delhi : Mr. S. Narendrapai P.I.O. & Dy. General Manager Corporation Bank, Head Office Mangalore Mangladevi Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Mangalore - 575001 : : : : : 02/08/2010 06/09/2010 14/09/2010 19/10/2010 25/11/2010RespondentRTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order Second Appeal filed onInformation sought: The Appellant had sought information through 11 queries. Reply of PIO: The PIO had responded giving some information and pointing out that most of the queries do not seek information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. Grounds for First Appeal: Refusal is contrary to provisions of RTI Act and a misinterpretation of the provisions. Grounds of Complete info...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Nafis Vs. Mcd, Gnct Delhi

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002323/15138 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002323 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Nafis, A-99, Zamrudpur, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048. Mr. S. K. Gupta PIO & Assistant Commissioner MCD, Central Zone, Jal Vihar, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi. 25/05/2011 11/08/2011 received after FAA order. Not Mentioned. 04/08/2011 25/08/2011Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order of Second Appeal received on: : : :Information Sought: 1. If any order was issued/given to the Prosecution Department. for making 100 challans. 2. According to the Challan Book, how many challans was been made on 23/05/2011? 3. How many challans book was used in issuing such challans? 4. What was the crime made by the victims of the Challans. 5. How much payment was made by the victims in the MCD Co...


Oct 12 2011

Mr.Ashwani Kumar Avasthi Vs. Vijaya Bank

Court: Central Information Commission CIC

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001455/SG/15158 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001455/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Ashwani Kumar Avasthi, H.N.1/307, Govind Nagar, Gali No. 3, Sanjay Gandhi Colony, Near Etah Chungi, G.T. Road, Aligarh(U.P.)-202001 Mr. Uday Kumar PIO & DGM Vijaya Bank, Head Office: 41/2, M.G. Road, Bangaluru-560001 03/03/2011 11/04/2011 13/04/2011 26/04/2011 18/05/2011 Reply of PIO Concerned PIO replied by sending the mark sheet of the objective test to the Appellant. Concerned PIO replied that the O.M.R. and answer key are not in the possession of the Bank. In view of the above, we are unable to provide the said information. Same as (2). Same as (2).Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on Q.No 1.: : : : :23 45Query Please provide the informa...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial