Central Information Commission Cic Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mr.Naveen Kumar Peer Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000786 Complainant : Shri Naveen Kumar Peer KG1/250 MIG, Vikaspuri New Delhi. The Public Information Officer Dy.GM.(Law) Northern Railway, HQ Office Baroda House New Delhi. Dated : 12.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 5.4.11 from Shri Naveen Kumar Peer against the PIO, Dy.GM (Law), Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 26.2.11. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO Dy.GM(Law), Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi is directed as follows: a) In case no reply...
Mr.Mani Chandra Vs. Ministry of Railways
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
Central Information Commission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 / New Delhi 110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000829 Complainant : Shri Mani Chandra S/o Shri Kashiram Shiv Nagar Toondla Post Toondla Firozabad 283204. The Public Information Officer North Central Railway DRM Office, Allahabad Division Allahabad. Dated : 12.10. 2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks x Respondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 6.4.11 from Shri Mani Chandra against the PIO, DRM Office, North Central Railway, Allahabad under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusal of his RTI request dated 25.10.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under section 18 and 19 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, it is directed as follows: i) Directions to CPIO DRM Office, North Central Railway, Allahabad is directed as follows: a) In case no reply has been given by ...
Shri.P Shiva Kumar Vs. Syndicate Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001664/SG/15147 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001664/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. P. Shiva Kumar A/225 1st Phase Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally Hyderabad- 500072 Central Public Information Officer, Asst. General Manager Syndicate Bank, Yamjal Branch 6-3-653 Pioneer House Regional Office- City Somajiguda Hyderabad - 500082 19/04/2010 11/05/2010 31/07/2010 31/08/2010 29/10/2010 Reply of PIO The content of the application is perused and the information cannot be furnished. You have already filed a Consumer Case No. 189/2008 against the Bank before CDRF Ranga Reddy Dist seeking compensation of Rs 8.25 lakh with interest in respect of the same issue which you have raised in the RTI Act. The bank as an opposite party has been contesting the same by filing a reply. Meanwhile you have also approached the Banking Ombudsman with a ...
Dr.Nupur Biswas Sinha Vs. United Bank of India
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC/SG/C/2011/001194/15140 Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2011/001194 COMPLAINT REMANDED TO First Appellate Authority United Bank of India O/o The Chief Regional Manager, Patra Market Branch, Krishnagar, Nodia Region, Dr. Nupur Biawas Sinha 7/2, Circular Fourth Bye Lane, Shibpur, Howrah - 711102 Public Information Officer United Bank of India O/o The Executive Director, United Tower, Head Office, 11, Hemanta, Basu Sarani, Kolkata - 700001ComplainantPublic Information OfficerFacts arising from the Complaint: The Complainant had filed a RTI application with the PIO on 16/05/2011 asking for certain information. He received a reply from the PIO, which he found unsatisfactory. The Complainant therefore filed a Complaint with the Commission (30/09/2011) under Section 18 of the RTI Act. It must be noted that there is an alternate and efficacious remedy of Firs...
Mr.K G Krishnamurthy Vs. Indian Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001466/SG/15161 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001466/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. K.G. Krishnamoorthy, 18 Ganapathy Nagar, Mayiladuthari-609002 Public Information officer, Indian Bank, Head Office, 66 Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600001 RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on : : : : : 04/02/2011 01/03/2011 11/03/2011 25/03/2011 19/05/2011Respondent:The information sought by Appellant were 21, out of which 7 are shown below: Q.No Query Reply of PIO 1. Please provide the information about Concerned PIO replied that all the comprehensive deposit policy. information sought by Appellant are available in our Banks website. Please visit our banks website www.indianbank.in. 2 Please provide the information about Same as (1). cheque collection policy...
Mr.Suresh Gopal Redkar Vs. Bank of India
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001619/SG/15148 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001619/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Suresh Gopal Redkar, House No. 101, Pedawaddo, Near Railway gate, Pedda, Margoa - Goa Central Public Information officer, Bank of India, Zonal Office, Dempo house, Campat , Panaji, Goa 403 001 19/07/2010 16/08/2010 08/09/2010 23/09/2010 22/11/2010 Reply of PIO Concerned PIO replied that the requested information is not available with the branch. Therefore we are unable to provide the same. However the concerned PIO enclosed the vouchers which were available at the branch.Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on Q.No 1.: : : : :Query Please provide the date and month wise details of the amount handed over by the Quepern Branch towards the paymen...
Shri.Umesh Kumar Jhunjhunwala Vs. Syndicate Bank
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi- 110067 Tel No: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001262/SG/15143 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001262/SG Relevant Facts Emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Umesh Kumar Jhunjhunwala C/o Shri Tulsyan Traders D. N. Singh Road P.O. Sujagunj Bazaar P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Bhagalpur Bihar- 812002 : Mr. Kanchan Kumar PIO & AGM Syndicate Bank Maurya Tower, 2nd Floor, Maurya Complex, Dak Balgla Road, Patna- 800 001 : 07.11.2010 : 19.11.2010 : 29.11.2010 : 16.12.2010 : 18.04.2011RespondentRTI Application filed on PIO Replied on First Appeal filed on Order of the FAA Second Appeal filed on S.No 1.2.3.Information Sought PIOs Reply Whether information of a Bank Account No, it is exempted under the RTI Act as it is of any person can be given other person personal information. However, under by the Officer of the Bank. exceptional circumstances, the Bank has to provide information to other person. There ar...
Shri. Neelanjan Sanyal Vs. United Commercial Bank (Uco)
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000538/SG/15157 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000538/SG Appellant : Neelanjan Sanyal, 16/17, Rabindra Avenue, Jyoti Complex, Flat No-4e, PO Malda-732101 West Bengal Mr. J. L. Metla CPIO & Assistant General Manager, UCO Bank, Head Office, 3 & 4, DD Block, Sector-I Salt Lake, Kolkata-700064 West Bengal 24/08/2010 27/08/2010 21/09/2010 23/10/2010 30/12/2010 PIO Reply The Respondent replied that the said scheme has been approved by the Board of Directors of UCO Bank, Kolkata on 02/07/2010 and pendency of some issues like modalities, execution of board from nodal bank etc.Respondent:RTI application filed on : PIO replied : First Appeal filed on : First Appellate Authority order : Second Appeal filed on : Sl. Information Sought 1. The Appellant sought in written status of implementation of central scheme (documents attached) providing subsidy ...
Shri. Hari Ram Anthala Vs. United Commercial Bank (Uco)
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Old JNU Campus, Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067 Tel: + 91 11 26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001217/SG/15146 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001217/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Hari Ram Anthala, UCO Bank, Sultanganj Branch Distt.Bhagalpur (Bihar) : Public Information Officer UCO Bank, Zonal Office, Sec, 17B Chandigarh. Punjab Mr. R. K. Sharma PIO & AGM UCO Bank, Zonal Office 5, Parliament Street, New Delhi : : : : : 02/08/2010 30/08/2010 12/12/2010 07/01/2011 13/04/2011 PIOs Reply The information sought is held by the bank in fiduciary capacity the disclosure of which is exempted under Section 8(1) (e) & 8(1) (d) of the RTI Act.Respondent(1)(2):RTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on Order of First Appellate Authority Second Appeal received onNo. Information Sought 1. The UCO Bank has engaged Advocate of Bank Panel, Distt. Courts, Ambala for the following civil suits against the officials ...
Mr.K G Krishnamurthy Vs. Banking Division
Court: Central Information Commission CIC
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001467/SG/15162 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/001467/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. K.G. Krishnamurthy, 18, Ganapathy Nagar, Mayiladuthuari-609002 Public Information officer, ICICI Bank, ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra, Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051 RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on : : : : : 04/03/2011 31/03/2011 12/04/2011 no order 18/04/2011Respondent:The information sought by Appellant was 21, out of which 7 are shown below: Q.No Query Reply of PIO 1. Please provide the information that Concerned PIO replied that ICICI Bank is being comprehensive deposit policy. Private sector bank does not come under Right to Information Act 2005. We regret our inability to share information about the account held with the bank under RTI Act. 2 Pleas...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »