Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Court June 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Sumanta Nandi Vs. the Indian Council of Agriculture
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ346CAT
1. The applicant a Scientist with the office of the respondent-3, by way of present application is seeking a direction to respondent-3 to relieve him and grant study leave with pay and allowances to join Ph.D.programme at University of Agriculture Sciences, Bangalore with other consequences (sic).The applicant was appointed as Scientist in Animal Physiology w.e.f.17.9.1998, vide communication dated 19.1.1995, the Director General, ICAR directed all the Directors/Project Directors/OSDs of all the Institutes/NRCs under ICAR system to encourage Scientist of ICAR who are holding Master's degree, to take up higher studies leading to M.Phil/Ph.D. to enable them to have full advantage of the Career Advancement Scheme (hereinafter referred as 'Scheme') in the ICAR. It was stated therein that the eligibility conditions for granting study leave as prescribed in the ARS (Study Leave Regulations), 1991 would be applicable. Later on various communications have been issued by the first respondent p...
M.A. Krishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Jun-27-2003
Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ113CAT
1. Shri M.A. Krishnan, Ex-Accounts Officer ALTTC Ghaziabad has filed present application under Section 19 of Administrative Tribunal's Act, 1985 challenging order dated 27.10.1999 (Annexure A4) imposing the punishment of dismissal from service as well as order dated 2.8.2001 (Annexure A7) whereby his appeal was rejected by the President based on UPSC advise dated 13.7.2001 (Annexure A8), besides seeking direction to reinstate him with its consequential benefits, regularisation to the period of suspension from 11.2.1992 till the date of passing the impugned orders.2. The facts which led to the filing of the present application are as under: The applicant was working as Accounts Officer (Cash) in the office of the Advanced Level Telecom Training Centre, (hereinafter referred as ALTTC) Ghaziabad. At about 11-45 hours on 7.2.1992 it was reported by the Internal Finance Advisor (GM (TX)/CGM) that as per the information received from Shri Bhagmal Singh, AAO (Cash) two cancelled cheques of R...
K.V. Ravindran and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Jun-23-2003
Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ252CAT
1. Since common question of law and facts are involved in the two original applications before us, they were heard together with the consent of the parties Counsel, for convenient disposal by a common judgment.2. Shri K.V. Ravindran, who is the applicant in O.A. No. 484/02 was appointed as Inspector of Customs and Central Excise on 17.4.1982 and had the opportunity to serve in that capacity at various places and offices in Karnataka State. While working as Inspector of Customs in the Docks Section of Mangalore Customs from 16.12.1993, he was placed under suspension vide order dated 17.2.1994 (Annexure-A) in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (1) of Rule 10 of Central Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. It would appear from the grounds of suspension contained in C. No. II/10A/94/A.3 dated 12.5.1994 (Annexure-A2) that on the basis of preliminary investigation report of the DRI, Mangalore, a criminal case came to be registered against M/s. Sheth Inte...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›