Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Court September 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.J. Antony Vs. the Director, Intergrated
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ285CAT
1. This Tribunal vide its order dated 1.10.1999 allowed the Original Application and quashed the orders impugned therein. The respondents had preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble High Court against the order of this Tribunal in O.A. No. 346/97 as per O.P. No. 4006/2000 and the Hon'ble High Court after hearing remitted the case back to the Tribunal with the following directions:- "Since the Tribunal has not gone into the merits of the case, we remit the case to the Tribunal. The Tribunal will dispose of the O.A. after considering as to whether the conclusions reached by the disciplinary authority that the first respondent is guilty of misconduct is supported by the materials on record and if so, whether the order to recover an amount of Rs. 12,000/- is legal. Now that the Tribunal has not disposed of the matter on merits, the Tribunal will therefore dispose of the matter on its merits in the light of what has been stated above".2. The applicant in the O.A. has challenged the order of...
S.K. Bhandari and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Sep-02-2002
Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ134CAT
1. This is a second round of litigation with regard to the determination of seniority of the applicant vis-a-vis Respondent No. 4.The woodcut profile of the case is as follows; The two applicants, namely, S/Shri S.K. Bhandari and Sukhdev Sharma, who were respectively Steno-typist and Clerk in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh, were appointed as Taxation Inspectors by way of transfer in March, 1984. In the appointment letter dated 9.3.1984 (Annexure A/1), it was stipulated that the applicants shall be on probation for a period of one year and if during the said period their work and conduct is not found satisfactory, they will be reverted to their former post. It was further stipulated that they shall have to pass departmental examination within a period of 3 years from the date of their appointment failing which they were to stand reverted to their former post. Shri Sher Singh, Respondent No. 4, was also similarly appointed as Taxation Inspector by way of transfer vide ord...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›