Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Court October 2000 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.R. Kirki Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT
Decided on: Oct-30-2000
1. The applicant was appointed to the Indian Forest Service w.e.f.1-12-1985. He was duly promoted to the selection grade w.e.f. 20-1 -94.Subsequently he was promoted as the Conservator of Forest (Vigilance) in the Super time Scale of Indian Forests under the Government of Karnataka (the Government for short) order dated 22-6-1996. During the year 1996-97 the applicant worked under the direct administrative control of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (P.C.C.F), one Shri K.S. Sadashivaiah, for the period from 1-10-1996. Through the confidential DO letter dated 22-9-1997 the Chief Secretary to the Government of Karnataka communicated the following adverse remarks to the applicant alongwith remarks on the same attributes which were favourable and not adverse. 1. The Officer needs to develop positive approach towards functions to be performed in different posts. If only he had positive approach, he could have contributed a great deal towards protection & infrastructure of dep...
Kalyanesh Kumar Bajpai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow
Decided on: Oct-10-2000
1. The applicant to this O.A., has prayed for issue of directions to the respondent nos. 1 to 3 for quashing of the impugned order of the Railway Board no. 727-E/1461E (i)(a) dated 7.9.98 (Annexure-4 to the O.A.) by summoning the original records containing the proceedings of the selection committee and the ACRs of the applicant for eight years from 1990-91 to 1997-98. A further prayer is for issue of directions to the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 for reviewing the applicant's claim for promotion to Senior Administrative Grade (hereinafter referred to as SAG) w.e.f. 12.3.98 i.e. the date on which his immediate juniors (respondent Nos. 4 and 5) were promoted, with all consequential benefits of seniority, salary etc. It has also been prayed that the respondents be directed to place the applicant at Serial No. 8A of the impugned promotion order dated 12.3.98 (Annexure-1), that is below Shri P.C. Gajbhiye and above Sri Deepak Gupta. Lastly, it is prayed that all the unfavourable/adverse entrie...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›