Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Madras Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M. T. Venugopal and Others Vs. Union of India Rep. by the Chief Person ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-24-2012
R. Satapathy, Member (A)) The three applicants herein are working in the construction wing of the Respondent's Department. They have filed the OA seeking the following relief : to call for the records related to the impugned Order No.104/2010/PG/MV Dr dated 18.11.2010 and Corrigendum No. U/P.535/XII/PG/Lorry Cl./CN unit dated 03.12.2010 (Annexure A-1) of the 3rd Respondent and to set aside the same and further to direct the Respondents to provide lien to the Applicants as Driver/III with effect from 26.11.1990 and 10.12.1985 respectively. 2. M/s. Abdul Ajees appeared for the applicant and Shri. R. Krishnamurthy appeared for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicants are working as Drivers/Gr. II/Adhoc in the office of the Chief Administrative Officer, Southern Railway, Egmore, Chennai - 8. They were initially appointed as Casual labours during 1982-1983 and they have attained temporary status in 1984 and promoted as Driver Gr. III in Group C on...
C. Manoharan Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Government Departme ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member. ... The applicants belong to Scheduled caste community are all similarly placed and working as Junior Telecom Officers in the office of the 2nd respondent and their next promotion is to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer. On 15.7.2007, BSNL conducted Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the grade of Sub Divisional Engineer (Group-B) in which the applicants also participated but declared as failed. Their grievance is that the respondents have fixed higher cut off mark for passing in LDCE Exam as 50% and 45% for SC and ST candidates, and not followed the instructions contained in the DOT Order No.22-5/91-NCG dated 30.11.1992 issued by the Department of Telecoms as per DOT letter No.22-5/9...
C. Cetty Mani and Others Vs. Union of India Rep. by Secretary, Governm ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
Hon'ble Mr. B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member. The applicants belong to Scheduled caste community are all similarly placed and working as Junior Telecom Officers in the office of the 2nd respondent and their next promotion is to the post of Sub Divisional Engineer. On 15.7.2007, BSNL conducted Limited Departmental Competitive Examination for promotion to the grade of Sub Divisional Engineer (Group-B) in which the applicants also participated but declared as failed. Their grievance is that the respondents have fixed higher cut off mark for passing in LDCE Exam as 50% and 45% for SC and ST candidates, and not followed the instructions contained in the DOT Order No.22-5/91-NCG dated 30.11.1992 issued by the Department of Telecoms as per DOT letter No.22-5/91-NGE dated 30.11.1992, according to which failed SC candidates with 20% marks and failed ST candidates with 15% marks should be reviewed for recommendation to declare them successful. Even though there are plenty of vacancies for SC...
K. Kulasekaran Vs. Union of India Rep. the Director, Department of Inf ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Sep-06-2012
Hon'ble Mr. B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member. The applicant working as Public Relation Assistant in the Information and Publicity Directorate, Puducherry was issued with charge memo dated 4.1.2010 for violating of Rule18(3) of CCS(Conduct) Rules for the following charges. 1. That the said Thiru K. Kulasekaran, working as Public Relations Assistant in the Directorate of Information and Publicity, Pudhucherry had failed to obtain prior permission from the government for running a newspaper weekly with effect from 12.7.2007 in the name of ‘Puducherry Vision’ by his wife Tmt. S. Kalaivani. Thus, Thiru K. Kulasekaran, has therefore failed to maintain absolute integrity and devotion to duty and has acted in a manner of unbecoming of a Government Servant, thus violating the Rules 3(1)(i), (ii) and (iii) of the CS (Conduct) Rules, 1964. 2. That during the aforesaid period the said Thiru K. Kulasekaran, working as Public Relations Assistant in the Directorate of Information and ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›