Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Lucknow Court January 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raja Ram Verma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow
Decided on: Jan-10-2003
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ365CAT
1. Raja Ram Verma has filed this original application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act and has sought the following reliefs: "(a) This Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased to quash the impugned order contained in Annexure A-3 in so far as it relates issue of fresh charge sheet and also quash the fresh charge sheet dated 28.12.93 contained in Annexure No. A-4. (b) This Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased further to quash all other consequential orders contained in Annexures No. A-5, A-6 issued by the respondent No. 2 after the issue of fresh charge sheet dt. 28.12.93 nominating fresh Enquiry Officers and Presenting Officer. (c) This Hon'ble Tribunal be pleased further to quash the impugned order dated 29.9.95 contained in Annexure No. A-10. (d) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case be given to the applicant.2. The indubitable facts, as necessary for resolving the controversy involved in this case are, that the applicant...
Dr. S.K. Tandon Vs. Council of Scientific and
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Lucknow
Decided on: Jan-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)(3)SLJ237CAT
1. The applicant of this O.A. has prayed for issue of directions for setting aside the impugned order dated 19th October, 2001 and 13th October, 2001 contained in Annexures No. A-19 and A-21 and further for directing the respondents to pay the sum of Rs. 76,793/- representing the pay and allowances for a period of 78 days wrongfully and illegally deducted from the retirement gratuity of the applicant. It is also prayed that directions be issued to the respondents for setting aside the impugned orders dated 30.5.2001 and 22.6.2001 as contained in Annexure No. A-14 and A-17 regarding treating of the period between 28.5.2001 to 1.6.2001 as dies non.2. Learned Counsel for the parties have been heard and pleadings on record have been perused.3. As per Annexure A-19 dated 19.10.2001 to the amendment application, the applicant was found not to have signed the attendance register for 73 days between 21st March, 2001 and 23rd September, 2001. The said annexure contains a recital to the effect ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›