Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Ernakulam Court February 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E.P. Joy Vs. the Chief Staff Officer (P and A)
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-25-2002
Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ213CAT
1. This Original Application has been filed by the applicant aggrieved by A-2 order dated 20.4.98 of the first respondent imposing upon him the penalty of withholding of one increment without cumulative effect for six months and A-4 order dated 29.12.98 of the second respondent as Appellate Authority rejecting his appeal and confirming the penalty imposed on him. He sought the following reliefs through this O.A.: (a) call for the records leading upto Annexure A-4 and quash Annexures A-2 and A-4. (b) declare that the applicant is not guilty of charges II and V shown in Annexure A-1. (c) direct the respondents to give promotion to the applicant to HS-I notionally w.e.f. 6.4.1995, with all consequential benefits.2. The applicant was a Mechanic Highly Skilled-II in the Naval Air Craft Yard (NAY for short) under the respondents. He was one of the Joint Consultative Machinery (JCM) IV Level member of HQ. Southern Naval Command. During 1994 he was the Secretary of the NAY Unit Works Committe...
T.M. Somarajan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-22-2002
Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ225CAT
1. The grievance of the applicant in this O.A. is with regard to the unresolved anomaly in his pay fixation on appointment by promotion to the Indian Police Service (IPS for short) Cadre from the Kerala State Police Service (SPS for short). The applicant, therefore prays, inter-alia, for the following reliefs: (i) Call for the records leading to Annexures A1 and A2 and set aside the same. (ii) Issue a direction to the respondents to fix the basic pay of the applicant in the post of Superintendent of Police (IPS Cadre) at Rs. 4500 + personal pay of Rs. 400 with effect from 9.12.1995 and disburse the arrears of salary due to the applicant, (iii) To declare that the applicant is entitled to have his pay fixed in the IPS Cadre on the basis of the pay drawn by him in the non-IPS Cadre as a confirmed Superintendent of Police applying the provisions contained in Section I of Schedule II of the Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules without giving effect to the unreasonable definition of higher sc...
Dr. M.K. Nair Vs. the President, Indian Council of
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-06-2002
Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ401CAT
1. The applicant while functioning as Director, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasargagod under the Indian Counsel of Agricultural Research (ICAR for short) was served with a memorandum of charges dated 3.10.1996. The Articles of Charges were as follows: "(1) While functioning as Director in 1990-1992, grave irregularities were committed by him in sanction of one Club Hall without being competent to do so which included deliberate splitting of cost in order to avoid seeking approval of the Council, not floating of open tender and getting it constructed from private parties at a cost of Rs. 3.12. lakhs (appx.) and thereby failed to maintain absolute integrity, devotion to duty. (2) While functioning as Director 1990-92 grave irregularities were committed by him in sanction of one Conference Hall without being competent to do so, which included deliberate splitting of cost in order to avoid seeking approval of the Council, not floating of open tender, getting it constructe...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›