Central Administrative Tribunal Cat Cuttack Court April 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manoj Kumar SwaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Decided on: Apr-12-2002
Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ398CAT
1. Applicant's father, while continuing as regular Gangman under S.E.Railways, died prematurely on 17.2.1999, as is evident from the Death Certificate, produced under Annexure-A/1. Within three months from the date of sudden death, the mother (widow) of the applicant submitted a representation on 17.5.1999, seeking an employment on compassionate ground in favour of her son (the applicant) in order to remove the distressed condition of the family. The said representation was forwarded by Respondent No. 5 to Respondent No. 4 vide Endorsement No.E/6/VII/233 dated 17.5.1999, with the following remarks. "Forwarded to Sr. D.P.O., Khurda Road for favour of further disposal please. Her case may please be considered as her husband expired on 17.2.1999, while on duty".The Income Certificate of the applicant's family dated 18.6.1999, as available under Annexure-A/4, was also produced before the respondents to show the distressed condition of the family. As has been admitted in the counter, the c...
Bindeswar Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Decided on: Apr-10-2002
Reported in: (2004)(3)SLJ399CAT
1. Applicant's father while working as Jamadar under the respondents breathed his last on 25.10.1996 prematurely leaving behind his widow, two sons and one daughter. On 20th April, 1997, the mother of the applicant approached the respondents to provide an employment to one of her sons (applicant) to remove the distress conditions of the family.The applicant had also submitted a representation on 20th August, 1997 seeking an employment on compassionate ground which was forwarded to the respondent No. 2 and respondent No. 2 on 13.2.1998 sought comments of respondent No. 4. The details having been furnished by the respondent No. 4 on 7.2.1999, with willingness of the applicant and the applicant having furnished an undertaking on 16.7.99, the matter was considered and the respondents rejected the prayer of the applicant on 21.9.1999 and, as a consequence, the prayer for compassionate appointment has been turned down on the ground that a lump sum amount of retirement benefits have been giv...
Smt. Sarojini Patra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Cuttack
Decided on: Apr-03-2002
Reported in: (2003)(1)SLJ291CAT
1. This Original Application, under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was filed during 1995 by one Dhirendranath Patra.The said Dhirendranath Patra, had entered into Railway services (as Jr.Clerk) on 05.10.1953. While working as Office Superintendent (Stores) Gr. -I in the Office of the Respondent No. 4, he faced superannuation from said services (on attaining the age of retirement) on 31.08.1990.When all other service benefits were given to him, one increment w.e.f.01.07.1983, personal pay of Rs. 60/- p.m. and the gratuity amounting to Rs. 40,400/- were not paid to him. Despite several representations, he received no fruitful result. Hence this Original Application was filed for redressal of the grievances. In this Original Application it has been prayed for a direction to the Respondents to release his incremental benefits etc., and the entire outstanding retirement benefits, i.e., gratuity, with interest within a stipulated period and allow this Original Applicat...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›