Andhra Pradesh Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Sambaiah Nayak and Another Vs. The State of Telangana, represented ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking to quash the order dated 18.10.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.457 of 2016 in C.C.No.5 of 2016 on the file of the Court of the Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases-cum-IV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, wherein and whereby the reliefs sought by the petitioners to (1) return the original sale deeds, link documents and pattadar passbooks, which are shown as item Nos.8 to 11 in the charge sheet, to the petitioners and (2) direct the Sub-Registrar Offices to permit sale transactions in respect of the above documents, were rejected. 2. The contention of Sri T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner is three fold: 1) the trial Court failed to consider that the second petitioner is the owner of the property covered under item Nos.8 to 11, 2) the trail Court, without considering the scope of Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance 1944 (hereinafter referred to as, the Ordinance), dismisse...
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) and Others Vs. M/s ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
Common Judgment: (Sanjay Kumar, J.) Parties and the cause being the same, these two cases are amenable to disposal by way of this common order. C.M.A.No.970 of 2016 arises out of the order dated 17.08.2016 passed by the learned XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (hereinafter, the Court below ), in Arbitration O.P.No.1669 of 2016, extended thereafter from time to time, i.e., on 01.09.2016, 07.09.2016, 14.09.2016, 19.09.2016 and 20.09.2016. C.M.A.No.987 of 2016 arises out of the order dated 29.09.2016 passed by the Court below in Arbitration O.P.No.2229 of 2016. The orders under appeal were passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, the Act of 1996 ). Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), the respondent in the O.P.s, is the appellant in both appeals, filed under Section 37 of the Act of 1996. The respondent in these appeals, M/s. Hotel Malligi Pvt. Ltd., Bellary District, Karnataka, was granted a licence by the ...
Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Vs. M/s. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
Sanjay Kumar, J. This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 26.08.2014 passed by the learned Company Judge in Company Petition No.235 of 2012 whereby, the said petition filed for winding up of the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for brevity, the APIIC ), was admitted and advertisement thereof was permitted to be carried out in the event the APIIC failed to deposit the sum of Rs.8,18,36,584/- to the credit of the company petition within a time frame. Aggrieved thereby, the APIIC preferred this appeal. By order dated 06.11.2014, the appeal was admitted and interim stay of operation of the order under appeal was granted for a period of six weeks. The said stay was extended until further orders on 18.12.2014. Application No.7 of 2015 was filed by the respondent, the petitioner in C.P.No.235 of 2012, to vacate the interim order dated 06.11.2014. Thereupon, this Court was informed on 22.06.2015 that the APIIC was attem...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›