Andhra Pradesh Court March 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Sree Chandrika Foods Vs. Andhra Bank, Tanuku, Rep. by its Authori ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-04-2016
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. The petitioners herein have availed certain financial assistance from the 1st respondent Andhra Bank. It appears, they have carried on business, but ended up in not repaying the money to the bank. It also appears, the last of the payments made by the petitioners was nearly four years back on 08.03.2012 when they paid Rs.6 lacs to the credit of the loan account. For the default committed in repaying the debt, the loan account has been declared as a non-performing assetby the bank and hence, it has started initiating securitization measures as provided for under Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the Act'). It is questioning these measures, the present Writ Petition is filed. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Dyumani, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent bank. No meaningful explanation has been forthcoming from the petitioners as to the reasons why they have co...
Muramalla Padmavathi Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Prin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-03-2016
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents. 2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of respondents for not conducting survey in demarcating the petitioner's land and in not considering the petitioner's representations dt.04-02-2013, 10-12-2015 and 14-12-2015. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for Revenue have placed before me order dt.14-06-2013 in W.A.No.110 of 2013 wherein a Division Bench of this Court, after referring to the Government Circular Rc.No.N2/1741/2010 dt.18-05-2010, prescribing guidelines, based on Board Standing Order No.34-A paragraph 20 and proceeding in D.O.Rc.No.N1/4296/2012 dt.22-08-2012 of the Commissioner, Survey, Settlements and Land Records, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad in regard to the demarcation of survey numbers, opined that there is no bar for revenue officials to conduct survey of lands at request of private...
C. Ranga Reddy and Others Vs. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-02-2016
Common Judgment: (Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J.) Though this Writ Appeal is directed against the interlocutory order dated 28.01.2016 passed in W.P.M.P.No. 2775 of 2016 in Writ Petition No. 2189 of 2016, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners-appellants and on behalf of Telangana State Power Generation Corporation Limited, Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy and Sri G. Vidya Sagar respectively would urge that since the controversy involved in the Writ Petition lies in a very narrow compass, the Writ Petition itself be decided at this stage. We have conceded to the request of the learned Senior Counsel appearing on either side because we have heard the matter at great length on merits. The combined Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited has taken out a Notification on 22.04.2013 proposing to fill-up approximately 361 vacancies of Firemen (120) and Security Guards (241) available at various units of the said Corporation. In the instant case, we are concerned w...
Jai Golden Emu Farms Rep. by its Proprietor Kishore Kumar Mane Vs. The ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
Common Order: (Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J.) These three Writ Petitions can be disposed of by this common order as the question involved is common and the factual matrix is also identical. The writ petitioners have secured financial assistance from the respective banks, which are arrayed as the respondents. They developed Emu farms for the purpose of raring those birds. They have established these farms, but however, it is alleged, due to lack of supporting infrastructural facilities, the farms could not be run as the farm produce could not be effectively marketed. Therefore, managing and running the farms became a very difficult task. In fact, it is alleged that the birds have been carried to the nearest forest area and released into the forest at least to enable them survive on their own. In these set of circumstances, all the farm owners have taken up the matter with the respective bankers, State Bank of India and NABARD, which takes care of the agricultural financing benefits. It is al...
M/s. Bhuvana Kisan Seva Kendra Proprietor Gopagoni Sugunakar Vs. Bank ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
Common Order: (Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J.) These Writ Petitions can be disposed of by this common order as the respondent bank namely Bank of Baroda is common in all the cases. Further, the question that has fallen for our consideration is also identical in all these Writ Petitions. In all these cases, the securitization measures adopted by the respondent bank, in particular proposing to put the secured asset to sale is questioned. There is no dispute on the factual count that the respective writ petitioners are borrowersand they answer the said expression as defined in Section 2(1)(f) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short, the Act'), which has been ushered in to regulate the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interests. The respondent bank answers the description of bank', as defined in clause (c) of sub-section (1) of Section 2, as it is a banking company with...
Chennavelli Narsimulu Vs. Molgari Narayan Goud and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
Common Order: 1. These two Civil Revision Petitions are being disposed of by this common order as they arise out of the same cause of action. 2. CRP No.5418 of 2015 was filed, challenging the order in Election OP No.1 of 2013, dated 23.11.2015, whereunder the first respondent in the Election Petition was directed to produce his two children along with their Aadhar cards on 27.11.2015 with an observation that failing production of them, adverse inference would be drawn against him. 3. The said order was passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Mahaboobnagar, with the following observations. This Election OP is filed by the petitioner alleging that the 1st respondent, who is elected as Sarpanch of Muddireddypally village of Balanagar mandal, in the Panchayat Election that was held on 27.07.2013 is having disqualification to hold the post of Sarpanch on the ground that 1st respondent got disqualification under Sec.19(3) of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, by having three children after the ...
Iragam Reddy Thirupal Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-01-2016
1. In this Writ Petition two orders - both dt.09.04.2015 viz., one passed by 3rd respondent forming an opinion that there is no Managing Committee for 4th respondent Society and appointing a person in-charge to manage the affairs of said Society, and another order passed by 2nd respondent declaring that 1st petitioner ceased to be the delegate of 4th respondent-Society in the 5th respondent-Financing Bank and Chairman of 5th respondent-Bank and consequently nominating the Vice-Chairman of 5th respondent-Bank as the Chairman of the said bank, are questioned. THE BACKGROUND OF THE LITIGATION 2. The petitioner nos.1 to 6 are Members of the Managing Committee of 4th respondent-Society and 1st petitioner is also its Chairman. By virtue of being the Chairman of 4th respondent-Society, the 1st petitioner automatically became a delegate of the said Society in the 5th respondent, it's financing Bank. He also became the Chairman of the Managing Committee of 5th respondent-Bank. These events happ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›