Andhra Pradesh Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalangi Nageswara Rao and Others Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Agri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
Common Order: Heard learned Counsel for Petitioners and learned Government Pleader. The point involved in this batch of cases is the legality of the restraint imposed on the petitioners by the fourth respondent Joint Director of Agriculture, the Notified Authority, with regard to the area of sale to be operated by the petitioners after obtaining necessary acknowledgement in Form A2 under Clause 8(3) of the Fertiliser (Control) Order, 1985 (for short, the Control Order). All the petitioners are wholesale dealers dealing with fertilizers under a licence issued under the above Control Order. They sell the fertilizers through out the State. It is their case that by misinterpreting G.O.Ms.No.297, Agriculture and Cooperation (FP.II) Department, dated 08.12.2011, they are restrained from selling the fertilizers outside their respective districts. The sale of fertilizers is governed by the said Control Order. The said Control Order was made in exercise of the powers conferred on the Central ...
Golkonda Ramulu Vs. Tonta Ramulu and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-29-2016
1. This writ petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the order dated 26.03.2014, passed by the Court of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar at Hyderabad, in I.A.No.669 of 2014 in O.S.No.155 of 2014 and the consequential proceedings issued by the District Collector, vide order bearing No.589/2014-A2-(P), dated 13.11.2014. 2. Heard Sri M.Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for the Panchayat Raj and Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the 1st respondent/election petitioner, apart from perusing the material available before the court. 3. Petitioner herein is an elected Sarpanch of Ameerpet Grampanchayt, Maheswaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and he got elected as the Sarpanch in the elections held on 23.07.2013. The 1st respondent herein filed O.P.No.155 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District and also filed I.A.No.669 of 2014 under su...
Boda Rakesh Naik Vs. The State Of Telangana, Represented by its Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-21-2016
1. The appellant herein filed private complaint on the file of I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Warangal against the accused 1 to 3, alleging the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(ii), 3(1)(v), 3(1)xv), 3(1)(viii) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the Act ) read with Sections 307, 506, 447, 324 and 350 read with 34 IPC. On reference under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C., FIR No.260/2010 was registered on the file of SHO P.S. Mills Colony, Warangal. Initially, the Sub Divisional Police Officer, N.Ajay Kumar, took up investigation and subsequently the case was investigated by Dr.P.Lavanya Naik Jadav, SDPO and after completion of investigation, filed charge sheet dated 6.6.2012 stating that no offence is established against the accused A-1 to A-3 under Sections 307, 447, 452, 506, 349, 350 read with 34 IPC and Section 3(v)(vii) (xv); except under Section 3(1) (x) of the Act. 2. Accordingly, the I Additional Jud...
R.S.R. Anjaneya Sarma Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented By ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
Common Order: (per V. Ramasubramanian, J.) 1. These writ petitions arise out of a common order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, at Hyderabad, dismissing the challenge made by the petitioners in W.P.Nos.6640, 6650 and 6658 of 2014, to two Government Orders by which the unofficial respondents in these writ petitions were conferred the benefit of absorption in the post of Senior Assistant in the Commercial Taxes Department, with effect from a previous date. 2. Heard Mr. Dhananjaya and Mr. Siva, learned counsel for the writ petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for the official respondents, Mr. K.G. Krishnamurthy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents in a few matters and Mr. N.Subba Rao, learned counsel appearing for the unofficial respondents in two matters. 3. The admitted facts out of which the present batch of writ petitions arise are as follows: (a) The petitioners in these writ petitions were originally sele...
M/s. Sushee Ventures Private Limited Vs. Rahul Agarwal and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
Sanjay Kumar, J. This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution arises out of the order dated 14.10.2016 passed by the learned VIII Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, in Arbitration O.P.No.672 of 2016. The petitioner herein filed the said petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, the Act of 1996 ) seeking an injunction restraining the respondents from alienating or encumbering the petition schedule property or parting with their possession thereof or creating therein third party rights by any means whatsoever during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings. By the order under revision, the Court below returned the petition for want of jurisdiction, permitting the petitioner to present it before the proper Court within two weeks. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner is before this Court. While ordering notice before admission on 28.10.2016, this Court took note of the fact that an injunction was i...
S.P. Abdulla Saheb and Others Vs. K. Krishna Murthy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
Common Order: (V. Ramasubramanian, J.) 1. The petitioners who are employed as Senior Assistants in the Department of Commercial Taxes in the State of Andhra Pradesh have come up with the present writ petitions challenging a common order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in a batch of original applications filed by the 1st respondent in each of these writ petitions. 2. Heard Mr. J. Sudheer, learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader for Services-I (Andhra Pradesh), Mr. P. Suresh Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. B. Ranganadh Rao, learned counsel for the original applicants before the Tribunal and Mr. P.V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel appearing for the impleaded respondents. 3. The issue involved in these writ petitions lies in a very narrow compass. A group of persons (1st respondent in each of these writ petitions) who got transferred from various other departments to the Commercial Taxes Department as Junior...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›