Andhra Pradesh Court January 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Y. Balaramaiah Vs. The Executive Engineer Public Health Division Rajah ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-27-2016
This writ petition is filed to set aside letter No.631M/MC-2/MPT/Mplty/TS-JTO-2/2015. dt.29.07.2015, of respondent No.1, whereby he has given a technical opinion to the effect that tender of respondent No.4 could be accepted, though he is not registered with respondent No.3 “ Municipality. The only point that needs to be decided in this writ petition is whether the opinion expressed by respondent No.1 in the impugned letter is sustainable under the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Tender Rules, 1967 (for short, the Tender Rules'). Rule 5(2) of the Tender Rules reads as under: 5(2). Tenders from the registered contractors only shall be considered. In the case of contracts the value of which exceeds rupees twenty thousand, tenders from the engineering firms of repute and from contractors registered in or outside the district may be considered, provided that they get themselves registered as contractors of the municipality prior to the submission of the tenders. Tender schedules may be...
M/s. BSCPL Infrastructure Limited Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-22-2016
1. In the present writ petition, challenge is to the notice bearing No.9315/Q/2011, dated 11.04.2012 issued by the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Ongole, Prakasam District/fifth respondent herein and the proceedings of the District Collector, Prakasam District/third respondent herein vide Rc.No.E1/780/2012, dated 03.04.2012. 2. On an application made by the petitioner on 26.11.2010 for grant of quarry lease for Road Metal and Gravel in respect of area admeasuring Ac.10.000 hectares in Sy.No.788/2 of Bodduvanipalem Village, Korisepadu Mandal, Prakasam District, the Assistant Director of Mines and Geology/fifth respondent herein called for the report from the Tahsildar, Korisepadu as to the classification of the land and its availability. Responding to the same, the Tahsildar vide Proceedings No.L.P/161/2011, dated 03.05.2011, issued No-Objection for grant of lease. Pursuant to the same, the Deputy Director of Mines and Geology, Guntur, vide proceedings No.8564/Q3/2010, dated 1...
R.R. Chandraiah Vs. Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Ananthapur a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges the award dated 30-08-2001 passed by the Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Ananthapur in I.D.No.161 of 1998 to the extent the same went against the petitioner. Briefly stated the facts and circumstances leading to filing of the present writ petition are as under: The petitioner was appointed as a Conductor in the respondent Road Transport Corporation in the year 1989 and he was terminated from service on 06-03-1997 followed by a departmental enquiry on the charge of un-authorized absence for the period from 24-03-1996 to 01-04-1996. After un-successfully availing the appellate and review remedies, the petitioner raised Industrial Dispute No.161 of 1998 under Section 2 (A) 2 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Labour Court, by way of an award, dated 30-08-2001, while setting aside the order of termination, directed re-instatement of the petitioner with continuity of service without back-wages and a...
Sushila Bai Vasudev Rao Bodhanker (died per LRs) and Others Vs. Govind ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
1. This appeal is preferred by the plaintiffs aggrieved by the judgment dated 16.06.2004 passed by learned V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad dismissing their suitO.S.No.345 of 1995 for partition of the suit schedule property into two equal shares and allotment of one such shares to them. 2. Factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The plaintiffs case is that Khande Rao Bodhanker (for short Khande Rao) and Anandi Bai (for short Anandi Bai) are couple. Khande Rao died intestate on 02.12.1976 and Anandi Bai also died intestate on 16.02.1995. They have two sons of whom the D1-Govind Rao Bodhanker (for short Govind Rao) is the elder son and one Vasudev Rao Bodhanker (for short Vasudev Rao) is the younger son. D15 is the son and D14 is the daughter-in-law of D1. D16 to D19 are sons of D14 and D15. Whereas the second sonVasudev Rao is concerned, he died intestate on 01.08.1977. His first wifeAmbu Bai died intestate on 06.06.1972. Their marriage was held in the year 1945 and they...
Jutta Arjuna Rao and Others Vs. The State of A.P.Department of Municip ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-21-2016
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare endorsement bearing ROC No.2664/2012-G1, dated 10.01.2014, of respondent No.4, whereby he has rejected the application of the petitioners filed for regularization of their plot admeasuring 456 sq.yards in RS.No.201/3 of Tadepalligudem Municipality as illegal. I have heard Sri N.Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities (AP) representing respondent Nos.3 and 4. The petitioners pleaded that their paternal grandfather, by name, Jutta Gangaraju, purchased an extent of Acs.1.80 cents in B.S.Nos.129/2 and 129/3 of Kadkatla Village, Tadepalligudem Municipality in the year 1945, that the said numbers were later renumbered as R.S.Nos.201/2, 201/3 and 201/4, that Jutta Gangaraju constructed a house over the said land and that he expired in 1951. That subsequently his sons i.e., Jutta Subba Rao and Jutta Somaraju, remained joint and constructed a building with Rcc ...
J. Ravinder Vs. State Election Commission, Telangana State, represente ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2016
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in rejecting the petitioner's nomination for the office of the Member of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation from Ward No.65-Karwan. I have heard Mr. M.V. Pratap Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Mr.P. Kesava Rao, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. The Certificate of Scrutiny issued by respondent No.3 shows that the petitioner's nomination has been rejected on the following grounds: (1) Property tax for 12-2-398/83 is pending - Rs.536/-, verified - Bill Collector reported it is true. (2) The additional columns in the affidavit are mandatory but column Nos.3 and 5 are not filled. The ARO has given report. Hence objections 2 and 3 are proved. Hence rejected. The learned Counsel for the petitioner strenuously submitted that both the objections referred to in the impugned Certificate of Scrutiny are not sustain...
Yandava Ramanamma Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2016
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside order dated 20-09-2014 issued by respondent No.3 in Form No.V-C declaring the petitioner as having ceased to be a Member of Hiramandalam-1 Mandal Parishad Territorial Constituency, Srikakulam District. The petitioner was elected as a Member of Hiramandalam-1 Mandal Praja Parishad on the Y.S.R. Congress Party ticket. In connection with the election for the office of the President of the Mandal Praja Parishad, a whip was issued by the Y.S.R. Congress Party to all its members. A complaint was made by the Whip of the said Political Party before respondent No.3 that the petitioner has cast his vote in the election held for the office of the President of the Mandal Praja Parishad, Hiramandalam-1 in violation of the whip. Based on the said complaint, respondent No.3 has issued a show cause notice to the petitioner. The petitioner has submitted her reply. By the impugned order, respondent No.3 has declared that the petitioner has ceased t...
A.X. Edwin Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad, rep. by its Managing Director ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-20-2016
1. This writ petition is filed praying to grant direction to defer holding of disciplinary proceedings pending conclusion of criminal proceedings. 2. Facts relevant for consideration of this case are as under. Petitioner is presently holding Middle Management Grade Scale-III cadre post. Petitioner worked as Branch Manager of Kankal Branch from 29.06.2009 to 22.05.2012 and Branch Manager, Rangampet Branch from 12.06.2012 to 02.02.2014. 3. Alleging that grave illegalities were committed while functioning as Branch Manager in the above two Branches, petitioner was served with two separate charge memos dated 20.01.2015 and 23.02.2015. Alleging that grave financial irregularities committed by the petitioner a s Assistant General Manager, respondent bank lodged complaint dated 03.02.2014 with the Station House Officer, Kulcharam Police Station, Medak District. Crime No.07 of 2014 was registered under Sections 409, 420, 464, 465, 467, 471 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code and police have take...
Siddareddy Srihari Reddy Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 5 in taking action on the petitioner's representation dt.19.10.2015 regarding unauthorized construction of godown by respondent No.6, at Inamadugu Village, Kovur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, as illegal and arbitrary. At the outset, it needs to be observed that the petitioner has not explained his locus in filing this writ petition. He has failed to indicate as to whether any of his personal interests are affected by construction of the godown by respondent No.6 and it is also not his pleaded case that he is espousing the cause of the public. Though this Court is not satisfied with the locus of the petitioner, since it has come to light that respondent No.6 is proceeding with the construction of godown without obtaining permission under the Andhra Pradesh Gram Panchayat Land Development (Layout and Building) Rules, 2002 (for short, the Rules'), notified vide G.O. Ms. No.67, dt.26.02.2002, this Co...
B. Rajender Vs. TSRTC, Rep. by its MD. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-19-2016
1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner, who is a conductor in the respondents-Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation, for short), for a Writ of mandamus declaring the show cause notice of termination from service issued by the 3rd respondent in proceedings dated 01-7-2015 received by the petitioner on 07-7-2015 as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice which also amounts to unfair labour practice and to set aside the same. 2. The petitioner was selected for the post of conductor in the respondents-Corporation and joined the service on 13-4-2009. His services were regularised by proceedings dated 10-02-2011 with effect from 01-01-2011 and his name is found at serial No.33. While so, the 3rd respondent issued charge-sheet dated 11-02-2015 alleging that the petitioner produced fake Secondary School Certificate (SSC Certificate) bearing roll No.577445 with grand total marks 441 (405+36) and secured the jo...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »