Andhra Pradesh Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Payam Rajulu Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. The sole accused, who is none other than the husband of the deceased and who is convicted for the offence of murdering her and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, is the appellant herein. To establish the prosecution story, PWs 1 to 14 were examined and Exs.P-1 to P-9 were got marked. Three MOs, out of which MO-1 is the knife, which is allegedly used for committing the offence, were seized and got marked. Ms. Vasundara Reddy, learned counsel for the sole appellant, would submit that the prosecution has failed to establish with credible material that it is the appellant, who has committed the offence. She would further contend that the alleged presence of PWs 1 to 3 at such an early hour, ie at 5-00 AM, itself is an unnatural event. To cap it, the confession said to have been made by the accused to PW-1, who is none other than the brother of the deceased, was far more unnatural. This apart, there is any amount of improvements made by the prosecu...
Bhanoth Raja and Another Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
At the interlocutory stage, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners, who are husband and wife, averred that they belong to schedule tribe and that from the time of their forefathers, their family has been in possession of Acs.4.20 guntas of land in survey No.76 of Nagaram Village, Paloncha Mandal, Khammam District, for more than nine decades. It is their further case that as they are entitled for conferment of rights over the forest land for cultivation under the provisions of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (for short the Act'), they have submitted application Nos.34 and 35 on 22.05.2008 along with several other scheduled tribes and till the date of filing of the writ petition, they have not received any information of their applications i.e., either accepting or rejecting the same. The petitioners also averred that on 31.05.2011, ...
Ch.Raja Reddy and Others Vs. The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
Common Order: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. In all these cases, the question arises for consideration is for coming under the purview of Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (for short the Act') whether the disability incurred by an employee has to be necessarily the one defined under Section 2 of the Act or any sort of disability. 3. The ancillary question which falls for consideration would be from what date the employee is entitled for the salary for the interregnum period. 4. It has been contended by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation that unless the disability falls in any of the categories mentioned in Section 2 of the Act, the employee is not entitled for the promotion as well as benefits conferred on him under Section 47 of the Act. 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel appeari...
Erwade Shivaji Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Cour ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. The sole accused in S.C.No.536 of 2009, who has been convicted by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Adilabad for having killed his wife and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, was the appellant in this appeal. Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The theory set up by the prosecution is that the accused and his wife were eking out their livelihood by attending to coolie work in a brick-kiln operated in the fields belonging to the husband of P.W.2 and the father of P.W.1. On 23.04.2009 at about 10.00 p.m. the deceased and her husband, the accused with their 2-year old daughter came to the house of P.W.2 and wanted to sleep there instead of going back to their hut. Therefore, P.W.2, as she knew the accused and his wife who were working in the brick-kiln of her husband, given them shelter and also provided them food. When the deceased and accused wanted to slee...
M/s. RK Infra and Engineering (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Bramhani Indu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
This Company Petition is filed under Sections 433(e)(f) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the Act ?) for winding up of the respondent. The petitioner averred that it is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the provisions of the Act and engaged in the business of execution of projects in the field of constructions, earth works, site levelling, reservoirs, roads and buildings, bridges, irrigation works, excavators, mining productions etc. That the respondent is a limited company incorporated under the provisions of the Act to (a) carry on the business of manufacturing, producing, casting, procuring, mastering, buying, selling, converting and in other ways dealing in all types of steels, castings, iron steels, aily, ingots, slabs, sheets, strips, rounds, bars, flats, sections and shapes, brass, copper, aluminium, stainless steels and other non-ferrous metals, to distil, refine or produce zinc chloride; (b) carry on in India or elsewhere the business of manufacturing, p...
Eashwar Lal Vs. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, G ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This Writ Petition is directed against the order of detention passed by the Commissioner of City Police, Hyderabad on 24.01.2015 exercising the power available to him under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Boot Leggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Land Grabbers Act, 1986. The father of Sri Manmohan Singh (hereinafter be referred to as the detenu') moved this Writ Petition on his behalf. The Commissioner of Police has passed the order of detention on 24.01.2015 and also supplied the grounds of detention to the detenu on the same day itself. He has referred to five separate instances of various crimes in which the detenu was involved. The first one is Crime No. 123 of 2013 registered by Mangalhat Police Station, pursuant to an incident that took place on 05.05.2013. The complainant was proceeding on a horseback at about 15.30 hours near about Jinsi Chowrah locality and whe...
M. Gangaram and Others Vs. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
(Prayers: WRMP NO. 34555 OF 2015: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to fix the pay in the cadre of Grade II Driver and pay the salary from 30-7-2012 to 2-2-2013 and arrears thereof to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.) WRMP NO. 34720 OF 2015: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to fix the pay in the cadre of Grade. II Driver and pay the salary from 22-9-2010 to 14-7-2011 and arrears thereof to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the main Writ petition. WRMP NO. 36391 OF 2015: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the res...
Kamireddy Brahma Reddy Vs. Visakhapatnam Port educational Society, rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
1. Heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri P. Sriram, learned standing counsel for the respondents. 2. The 1st respondent is a statutory body under The Major Ports Act'. It started educational institutions for the benefit of the children of its employees in the year 1956. The Schools were funded by the 1st respondent and they were directly under the control of the 1st respondent. There were three primary schools and three high schools run by the 1st respondent. Later on, in the year 1977, the 1st respondent incorporated the 2nd respondent Society and started running of the Schools through the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent is receiving aid in respect of some of the teaching staff from the State Government and the 1st respondent also releases funds every year to meet the salary and other expenditure of the un-aided posts. The 2nd respondent is only a superfluous body created to give an impression as if it is an independent organization running...
National Institute of Technology, Rep. by its Director Vs. Md. Akbar, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This Appeal is directed against the Order passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition instituted by the respondent herein. The respondent, who was working as a Store Assistant in the Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Warangal, called in question the correctness of the Orders passed by the Director of the said Institute on 07-08-2015 placing him under suspension pending enquiry. The learned Single Judge, having observed that this Court would not normally interfere with the Order of suspension pending enquiry, but however, in the present case, vague and uncertain allegations were made against the petitioner, which could not be answered by him and hence, the Court is of the considered opinion that the suspension Order is liable to be revoked. Accordingly, the writ petition has been disposed of. The learned Standing Counsel for the National Institute of Technology, Warangal would submit that the allegations adverte...
The Union of India and Others Vs. Shamsher Singh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-07-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This writ appeal is preferred by the Union of India and its officers, who are managing and manning the Central Industrial Security Force Organization. This appeal is preferred against the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.7356 of 2014. The respondent herein is a constable enrolled with Central Industrial Security Force. On 08.05.2013, when the petitioner reported to duty he was suspected to be under the influence of an alcoholic beverage. Therefore, he was taken to the KGH Hospital, Visakhapatnam for medical examination. It appears the respondent has declined to cooperate for undergoing the medical examination. However blood and urine samples were collected and they were sent to A.P. Forensic Science Laboratory, Hyderabad for analysis. The analysis by that laboratory revealed that there was no content of ethyl alcohol therein. However, the Central Industrial Security Force has treated the act of non-cooperation by the petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »