Andhra Pradesh Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mohd. Rafiuddin Ahmed Rep. by Its Gpa Ho Vs. The State of Telangana Th ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-02-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.1036 of 2015 02-06-2015 Mohd. Rafiuddin Ahmed Rep. by its GPA Holder Syed Ismail and others....Petitioners The State of Telangana Through Public Prosecutor,High Court, Hyderabad and another.Respondents Counsel for Petitioners : Sr.Sadu Rajeshwar Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Asst. Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig Nizami < Gist: > Head Note: ?. Cases referred: 1) MANU/KE/0221/205 = 2005(1) KLJ907THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.1036 of 2015 ORDER: In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners/A.1 to A.3 seek to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.342 of 2010 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2) A1 is the husband of de facto complainant. A2 and A3 are parents of A.1. 3) The private complaint filed by de facto complainant on 13.07.2009 was forwarded by learned XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Ma...
Thota Tata Vs. The District Collector Krishna District
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-02-2015
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.28047 of 2012 2-6-2015 Thota Tata Rao Petitioner The District Collector Krishna District at Machilipatnam and others Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Mr. C. Raghu COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1, 2 and 4: G.P. for Co-operation (AP) COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.3 : None appeared ...
M/S. New Hyderabad Medak Transport, Hyde Vs. The State of Telangana, R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.6375 of 2015 01-6-2015 M/s. New Hyderabad Medak Transport, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Managing Partner Mohd. Jaweed Ahmed Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary to the Consumer Affairs, Food and Civil Supplies, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad; and 3 others Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Counsel for Respondents 2&3: Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, Standing Counsel. Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sri T.Srikanth Reddy ?. Cases referred:1. (1993) 1 SCC712. (1995) 1 SCC4783. 2012 (1) ALT482HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.6375 of 2015 Date:01. 6-2015 HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.6375 of 2015 Order: The 2nd respondent-Corporation has called for tenders for transportation of food grains, pulses or any other commodities from various places within and outside the district to various places within and outsi...
K. Narasinga Vs. K. Neeraja @ Raji
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.M.A.No.1056 OF200601-06-2015 K. Narasinga Rao.Petitioner K. Neeraja @ Rajini . Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.J. Prabhakar Counsel for respondent: Sr.P.S.Rajasekhar ?. Citations: 1) AIR2011SC2748= (2011) 13 SCC1122) 1994 (3) ALT332(D.B.) 3) (1991) 4 SCC3124) (2005) 3 SCC3135) (2009) 1 SCC3986) (2005) 2 SCC227) AIR2012SC25868) (2013) 2 SCC1149) AIR1978AP6= 1977 (2) APLJ103(NRC) 10) AIR2013SC217611) AIR2005SC329712) AIR1940Madras 929 13) (1996) 4 SCC47914) AIR1971P & H141THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY C.M.A.No.1056 OF2006AND C.M.A.M.P.No.200 OF2014IN C.M.A.No.1056 OF2006Common Order: (per Honble Sr.Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) C.M.A.No.1056 of 2006 is filed by the appellant husband against the order passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, in O.P.No.64 of 2004 dated 17.08.2006, dismissing his petition seeking disso...
J.V. Ramana Murthy Vs. The State of a.P,rep. by Its Spl. Public
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Appeal No.405 of 2006 01-06-2015 J.V.Ramana Murthy....Appellant The State of A.P,Rep. by its Spl. Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for Appellant : Sr.G. Surapu Naidu Counsel for Respondent : Sr.Ghani A Musa Special Public Prosecutor for ACB ?.Cases referred: 1) (2013) 3 SCC7212) (2002) 10 SCC371HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.405 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the Accused Officer (AO) aggrieved by the judgment dated 13.03.2006 in C.C.No.26 of 2001 passed by learned Additional Special Judge for SPE & ACB Cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad convicting him for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short P.C Act).2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) AOJ.V.Ramana Murthy worked as Junior Assistant in the office of General Manager (PW10).District Industries Centre (for short DIC).Kurnool from 14.0...
Shri Kashi Math Samsthan, Benaras Rep. Vs. Srimad Sudhindra Thirtha Sw ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Appeal Suit Nos.90 of 2009 1-6-2015 Shri Kashi Math Samsthan, Benaras Rep. by its Matadhipathi Srimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami and another Appellants Srimad Sudhindra Thirtha Swami Sri Vyasashrama, Haridwar Rep. by GPA Agent Sri Guru Ganapathi Prabhu and another Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS : Sri Matta Purushotham Reddy, for Sri P. Hemachandra COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 : Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, Senior Counsel CITATIONS:1. 1916 Privy Council 256 2. AIR1954SC6063. 1974 (2) SCR74= AIR1974SC1994. AIR1980SC7075. (1918) LR45IA16. (1925) ILR52Cal 748 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY APPEAL SUIT NOs.90 AND91OF2009COMMON JUDGMENT: A disciple of the Matadhipathi of a Mutt having hoary past dragged his own mentor to a seamless litigation claiming the latters gaddi. Being unsuccessful in the suit, he has landed up before this Court to chance his arm. The manner in which the supposedly ascetic and purported renouncer of the world i...
C.Radhakrishnama Naidu and Oth Vs. The Government of andhra Pradesh,re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION Nos.24587 OF201401-06-2015 C.Radhakrishnama Naidu and others...Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(Registration)Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others...Respondents Counsel for PetitioneRs.Sr.Kambhampati Ramesh Babu Sr.S.Rama Moorthy Reddy Sr.A.Giridhar Rao Sr.M.V.Pratap Reddy Sr.A.Chandraiah Naidu Sr.P.Lakshma Reddy Sr.Ch.Venkat Raman Counsel for Respondents: G.P.for Revenue(AP) G.P.for Endowments(AP) Sr.K.R.Prabhakar S.C.for S S H MUTT ?. Cases referred 2010 (5) ALD4442 2011 (4) ALD433 2011 (6) ALD5024 (2005) 12 SCC775 2012 (2) ALD3326 2012 (6) ALD2607 (1989) 3 SCC998 (2012) 1 SCC656 9 AIR1957Madras 472 10 AIR1970Orissa 22 11 AIR1958Patna 193, 12 (2009) 7 SCC36313 2013 (4) ALD42614 AIR1955SC60415 1902 AC47416 2014 (4) ALD35817 2013 1 ALT77418 (2003) 5 SCC66219 (1989)14 Appeal Cases 493 20 (1980) 2 SCC12021(1980) 4 SCC65322(1980) 4 SCC69723 AIR1941PC1624 AIR1967SC1427 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE S...
Chinta Madhu Sudhana Vs. Chinta Naga Lakshmi and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.2502 of 2014 01-6-2015 Chinta Madhu Sudhana Rao Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant Chinta Naga Lakshmi and another Respondents/Petitioners/Plaintiffs Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondents: Sri Yeka Balasubrahmanyam ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2010SC28512.AIR2003SC34501) HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.2502 of 2014 Date:01. 6-2015 Order: This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 03-7-2014 passed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Eluru, West Godavari district in I.A.No.715 of 2014 in O.S.No.452 of 2011.2. The respondents filed the suit to declare the 1st respondent as the legally wedded wife and the 2nd respondent as the legitimate son of the revision petitioner and for grant of maintenance to them. In the said suit, they filed an interlocutory application to send the blood samples of the 2nd plaintiff and the defendant to the Forensic Science...
Smt. Nallamothu Siva Yogeswari? Rev Vs. State of a.P., Rep. by the Aut ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-01-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.44 of 2012 01-6-2015 Smt. Nallamothu Siva Yogeswari Revision Petitioner/Respondent No.1/Claimant Petitioner State of A.P., Rep. by the Authorized Officer, Land Reforms Tribunal, Bandar, Krishna district Respondent/Appellant/Respondent No.2 Smt. Sadineni Annapurnamma and another Respondents/Respondents 2 and 3/Respondents 1 and 3 Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya Counsel for Respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Arbitration Counsel for Respondents 2&3: None ?. Cases referred: Nil. HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Civil Revision Petition No.44 of 2012 Date:01. 6-2015 Order: This civil revision petition is filed against the judgment dated 02-11-2011 passed by the Chairman, Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal cum II Additional District Judge, Eluru, West Godavari district in L.R.A.No.29 of 2000.2. I have heard Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner-respondent No.1 and the learned Government...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›