Skip to content

Andhra Pradesh Court June 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 17 2015

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S G.K. Properties Private L ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A. No.42 of 2015 17-06-2015 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-II Appellant M/s G.K. Properties Private Limited... Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma Counsel for the Respondent: - ?. CITATIONS:169. ITR174(2010) 322 ITR158322 ITR82THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A. No.42 of 2015 ORDER:- (per Honble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram, J) This appeal at the instance of Revenue, arises from the order of the Tribunal dated 16.09.2014 in ITA No.1803/Hyd/2013 for the assessment year 2007-08, raising the following substantial question of law: In the facts and circumstances of the case, whether the order of the Honble Tribunal (ITAT) is not erroneous and perverse in law in cancelling the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the Respondent-assessee made a wrong claim of business profits...


Jun 16 2015

A.P.Arya Vysya Mahasabha Rep.By Its Pres Vs. Mutyapu Sudershan and Oth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-16-2015

HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1961 OF201516-06-2015 A.P.Arya Vysya Mahasabha rep.by its President..PETITIONER Mutyapu Sudershan and others..RESPONDENTS. Counsel For The Petitioner: M/s.K.M.Mahender Reddy Counsel For Respondents: Sr.Prabhakar Peri : >Head Note : ?. CITATIONS : 1. 2001 (5) ALD705(FB) 2. 2003 (3) ALD1533. AIR2004Andhra Pradesh 310 4. 2002 (6) ALT2685. (2011) 13 Supreme Court Cases 774 6. (2001) 8 Supreme Court Cases 509 7. (1978) 2 S.C.R.272 8. AIR1985SC12339. 1996 AIR159510. 2008 (1) ALT3611. AIR2012SC172712. 2014 (2) ALD101HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1961 of 2015 ORDER: The respondent No.2 in I.A.No.17 of 2015 in E.O.P.No.1 of 2015 on the file of Vacation Civil Judge (District Judge).Nizamabad preferred this revision under Article 227 of Constitution of India (Constitution) challenging the ex parte ad-interim injunction dated 12-05-2015 by the Vacation Civil Judge (District Judge).Nizamabad....


Jun 11 2015

M.V.Krishnai Vs. The Controller of Legal Metrology, Gover

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-11-2015

THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29894 of 2011 11-06-2015 M.V.Krishnaiah . Petitioner The Controller of Legal Metrology, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and 2 otheRs.Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Mr.P.Sridhar Reddy Counsel for Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (A.P) ?. CITATIONS: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29894 of 2011 Dated: 11.06.2015 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare Circular Memo No.3255/L2/2011, dated 26.08.2011, of respondent No.1 and consequential Circular Memo No.1857/B/11, dated 12.09.2011, of respondent No.3 as illegal and without jurisdiction. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondents to renew his repairer licence without insisting for deletion of the word Corporation from the name of his business establishment. I have heard Mr.P.Sridhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Civil Su...


Jun 05 2015

S. Davender R Vs. S. Ravinder Red

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-05-2015

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.463 of 2013 05-06-2015 S. Davender Reddy Petitioner. S. Ravinder Reddy ...Respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri B. Nalin Kumar Counsel for Respondents: Sri K. Ashok Reddy : ?. Cases referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRP No.463 of 2013 Date:05.06.2015 ORDER: This revision is preferred against order dated 12-12- 2012 in I.A.No.309/2012 in O.S.No.1271/2007 on the file of XXII Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. Revision petitioner herein is plaintiff and respondent herein is defendant in O.S.No.1271/2007. Respondent herein filed I.A.No.309/2012 under Section 5 of Limitation Act to condone delay of 850 days in filing petition to set aside ex-parte judgment and decree dated 25-02-2010 and the said petition was opposed by the plaintiff i.e., revision petitioner herein and the trial Court considering the material, overruled the objection of the plaintiff and allowed the application and condoned...


Jun 05 2015

Sardar Balwanth Sin Vs. Sardar Bhagath Sing

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-05-2015

HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR SECOND APPEAL No.124 OF2009and batch 05-06-2015 Sardar Balwanth Singh..Appellant. Sardar Bhagath Singh..Respondent. Counsel for the appellant: Sr.B.VIJAYSEN REDDY Counsel for respondent: Sr.RAMIDI SATYANARAYANA HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR SECOND APPEAL No.124 OF2009& CONTEMPT CASE No.1935 OF2014COMMON JUDGMENT: This appeal is preferred against judgment dated 19-1-2009 in A.S.No.332 of 2007 on the file of Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad whereunder judgment dated 29-1-2007 in O.S.No.3459 of 2004 on the file of V Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is reversed. Appellant herein is the defendant and respondent herein is plaintiff in O.S.No.3459 of 2004. Brief facts leading to this appeal are as follows: Plaintiff filed above referred suit for declaration that he is owner of site admeasuring Ac.9.5 square yards situated at Ameerpet, Hyderabad, which is shown as plaint schedule and for other consequential reliefs. Acc...


Jun 04 2015

andhra Association of Tela Vs. The Union of India, Rep. by Its Central

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-04-2015

THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15355 OF201504-06-2015 Andhra Association of TelanganaPETITIONER The Union of India, Rep. by its Central Board of Film Certification, Hyderabad Chapter, Telangana State and others.... RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner : MR. P. LALITHA KAMESH Counsel for Respondents: MR. B. NARAYANA REDDY (ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL) GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE MR. M. SURENDER RAO ...


Jun 03 2015

M.M.A Baig and Others Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-03-2015

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.2817 of 2013 03-06-2015 M.M.A Baig and others....Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another.Respondents Counsel for Petitioners : Sr.Sarosh Bastawala Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor ?.Cases referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.2817 of 2013 ORDER: In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioners/A1 to A.5 seek to quash the proceedings in S.C.No.27 of 2012 on the file of VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Secunderabad. 2) On the Complaint dated 26.10.2011 given by the de facto complainantA. Krishna Veni, the Police of Nampally Police Station registered a case in Cr.No.210 of 2011 and after investigation laid charge sheet against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 for the offence under Section 3 (1) (x) of SCs & STs( Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ( for short the Act).3) ...


Jun 03 2015

Mukesh Kumar Mittal Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by Asst. Dir

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-03-2015

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.88 of 2015 03-06-2015 Mukesh Kumar Mittal....Petitioner The State of Telangana Rep. by Asst. Director of Agriculture (Regular) Mallial Division & Agricultural Officer Kodimial Mandal & Seed Inspector Kodimial, Karimnagar District. Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and State of A.P, Hyderabad. Respondent Counsel for Petitioner : Sr.D. Krishna Murthy Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor ?.Cases referred: 1) 2002(2) ALD (Crl) 860 (AP) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.88 of 2015 ORDER: In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, the petitioner/A2 seeks to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.637 of 2012 on the file of Additional Judicial FiRs.Class Magistrate, Karimnagar. 02. The factual matrix of the case is thus: The complainant is the Mandal Agricultural Officer-cum-Seed Inspector, Kodimial Mandal, Karimnagar District. A.1 is the Pro...


Jun 03 2015

Puli Dinesh Babu Vs. The State of Telangana Rep. by Its Publi

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-03-2015

THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.14605 of 2014 03-06-2015 Puli Dinesh Babu....Petitioner The State of Telangana Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, Telangana, High Court, Hyderabad and others.Respondents Counsel for Petitioner : Party-in-person Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor ?.Cases referred: 1) 2005 (2) ALD (Crl.) 751 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.14605 of 2014 ORDER: In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner/accused seeks to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.1167 of 2012 on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. 2) On the report given by defacto complainant, the police of Gandhinagar P.S registered a case in Cr.No.263 of 2012 and after investigation laid charge sheet against the accused for the offences under Sections 3 and 4(1) of A.P.Prohibition of Ragging Act, 1997 (for short A.P Ragging Act) and Section 509 IPC. The prosecution case briefly is that the defacto...


Jun 03 2015

K.Bhar Vs. Joint Collector and Addl.Dist.Magistrate A

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-03-2015

The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.17964 of 2011 03-06-2015 K.Bharathi Petitioner Joint Collector & Addl.Dist.Magistrate Anantapur District and 3 others Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.R.Balarami Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: GP for Civil Supplies (AP) ^Counsel for respondent No.4:Ms.Addula Triveni ?.Cases cited: --- The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.17964 of 2011 Dated 03.06.2015 The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. I have heard Mr.P.R.Balarami Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (AP) representing respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Ms.Addula Triveni, learned Counsel for respondent No.4. Respondent No.2 has notified the vacancy of permanent fair price shop dealer of S.Beerepalli Village, Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District on 10-01-2011. ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial