Andhra Pradesh Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govindu Venkata Sivananda Murt Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh,panchay ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.40667 of 2014 653 of 2015 23-06-2015 Govindu Venkata Sivananda Murthy... PETITIONER The State of Andhra Pradesh,Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (R.D.I) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Special Chief Secretary to Government, and others...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr. O.Manoher Reddy Mr. Taddi Nageswara Rao Mr. C.Nageshwara Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj ?.Cases referred 2010 (4) ALD776(DB) 2 2004 (2) ALD1(LB) The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P. Nos. 40667, 41232 of 2014 and 653 of 2015 COMMON ORDER : As the issue involved in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are being disposed of by way of this common order.2. All these writ petitions are filed assailing the G.O.Ms.No.135, Panchayat Raj & Rural Development (R.D.I) Department, dated 17.09.2014 issued by the first respondent. All the writ petitioners in...
Vykunta Veera Anjaneyu Vs. The State of andhra Pradesh,rep. by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1077 of 2015 23-06-2015 Vykunta Veera Anjaneyulu... PETITIONERS The State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Secretary, Endowments Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.M.Madhava Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: The Government Pleader for Endowments and Government Pleader for Revenue. ?.Cases referred (1996) 3 Supreme Court Cases 75 The Court made the following: THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1077 OF2015ORDER : This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 vide proceeding in Rc.No.DP2/27164/2013, dated 15.01.2014 and subsequent action in invoking Section 22 (A) (1) (c ) of the Registration Act vide letter No.N2/10868/2014-1, dated nil-5-2014 and proceedings Rc.No.A5/2088/2013, dated 06.09.2014 as illegal and arbitrary.2. The petitioner states that he has purchased the land to an extent of Ac.0.55 cen...
Madala Jyothi and Anothe Vs. Karanam Tirupalaiah and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1350 of 2012 23-06-2015 Madala Jyothi & another.... PETITIONERS ` Karanam Tirupalaiah and others....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: MR. K.S.Gopala Krishnan Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Ch.C.Krishna Reddy ?. Cases referred AIR2010Supreme Court 1654 2 2001 (5) ALT130(F.B) HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1350 of 2012 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the orders passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Gudur in O.S.No.230 of 2010 dated 09.02.2012 wherein the Court below declared the suit settlement agreement dated 10.06.1997 as inadmissible in evidence for want of Stamp Duty and Registration.2. The case of revision petitioners is that the first respondent, who is the owner of the suit property and father of first petitioner executed an agreement for settlement dated 10.06.1997 in favour of the first petitioner and delivered possession of the suit property and...
Kukkala Venkateswarlu and Two Ot Vs. The Acharya Nagarjuna University, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.4962 of 2015 and batch 22-06-2015 Kukkala Venkateswarlu and two others.Petitioners The Acharya Nagarjuna University, Rep. by its Registrar, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur Town and District, Andhra Pradesh and seven others .Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.Pulla Rao Yellanki Counsel for the respondents:Sr.Srinivas Mantha #M. Srinivas and five others.Petitioners $The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Kothagudem Collieries PO50710, Khammam District, Telangana State Represented by Chairman & Managing Director and another .Respondents !Counsel for the petitioneRs.Smt. Udaya Sr.^Counsel for the respondents : ----- ?.Cases referred 1. 2009 (4) SCC5902. (2003) 9 SCC5643. (1987) 4 SCC6714. (1995) 4 SCC104THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.4962 of 2015 and 7632 of 2015 Common Order: In both these cases a common question touching upon the eligibility of the petitioners for selection to the posts of Assis...
M. Linga Murt Vs. R.M.Rama Devi and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2003 of 2015 19-06-2015 M. Linga Murthy...Petitioner R.M.Rama Devi & others...Respondents. For petitioner :Sri M. Satish Kumar, Advocate. For Respondents:None appeared. ?.CITATIONS:1. AIR1973AP2452. AIR1973AP312HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2003 of 2015 ORDER : This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner in I.A.No.777 of 2014 in O.S.No.2577 of 2010, aggrieved by order dated 03.02.2015, passed by the V-Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.2. Respondent No.1 herein has filed the aforesaid suit in O.S.No.2577 of 2010 against the petitioner herein and three others, for recovery of an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-. In the aforesaid suit, the petitioner/1st defendant has filed the present application in I.A.No.777 of 2014 under Order 7 Rule 11 r/w.Sec.151 CPC, for rejection of plaint on the ground that the same is barred under law. I...
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Ba Vs. Smt. Nallagatla Sarojini a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-19-2015
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI C.M.A.No.73 of 2008 19-06-2015 The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Bandar Road, Vijayawada .Appellant Smt. Nallagatla Sarojini and others. Respondents Counsel for the appellant:Sri Kota Subba Rao ents 1 to 5 : Sri V.Srinivasa Rao : ?. Cases referred:2013. (2) ALD61(SC) AIR2007SC2481976 Lab I.C1163AIR2009SC20191969 ACJ422THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI C.M.A.No.73 of 2008 JUDGMENT: This appeal by the appellant/2nd opposite party under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is directed against the order dated 15.11.2007 in W.C.No.69 of 2005 passed by the learned Commissioner for Employees Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Vijayawada.2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant/2nd opposite party (the 2nd opposite party, for brevity) and the learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 5/applicants (the applicants, for brevity). None appeared for the 6th respondent/first opposite part...
M.Salahuddin Vs. The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Publ
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2015
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO Criminal Appeal No.1395 of 2014 18-06-2015 M.Salahuddin Ayub.Appellant The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad..Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.R. Sameer Ahmed Counsel for the Respondent: --- : ?. Cases referred: 1. AIR1959AP6592. (1994) 4 SCC6023. 1999 Supreme Court Cases (Crl) 1277 4. AIR2003SC5415. (2010) 6 SCC16. AIR2002SC236THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1395 of 2014 JUDGMENT: This appeal is preferred under Section 341 of Cr.P.C.by the petitioner, who moved the learned V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Mahila Court at Hyderabad, seeking the following reliefs: 1) Take cognizance of this matter, conduct inquiries as required, give specific finding and register a criminal complaint with the appropriate investigating agency against the prospective accused as detailed in this application and deal with the matter as per law enshrined in Section 340 and 195 of the...
Jala Prabhu Vs. The State of a.P., Rep. by Its Principal
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2015
The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.13933 of 2011 18-06-2015 Jala Prabhu Das Petitioner The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Aranya Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad and 2 others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.TV.Jaggi Reddy for Mr.S.Suba Reddy Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Forests (AP) ?.Cases cited: The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.13933 of 2011 Dated 18.06.2015 The Court made the following: Order: At the interlocutory stage, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3, in interfering with the petitioners possession over the land admeasuring Acs.13-20 cents in R.S.No.182 of Gullapudi Village, Musunoor Mandal, Krishna District, as illegal and arbitrary. In his affidavit, the petitioner stated that his father late Paramanandam was inducted in...
Dasam Vijay Rama Vs. M.Sai S
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.No.1621 of 2015 17-06-2015 Dasam Vijay Rama Rao .Petitioner M.Sai Sri . Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D. Madhava Rao Counsel for the Respondent: --- : ?. Cases referred:1. [2009]. 151 Comp Cas 51 (AP) 2.1995 (3) ALD341(DB) THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1621 of 2015 ORDER: This revision has been preferred by the 2nd petitioner in Family Court O.P.No.1547 of 2014, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. The sole respondent herein is the 1st petitioner in the above O.P. The petitioner herein is the husband and the respondent is his wife. Both of them have filed the aforesaid O.P.No.1547 of 2014 under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for dissolution of their marriage performed on 22.08.2010 by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. The case of the petitioners in the O.P. was that they are both Hindus by religion and faith and got married on 22.08.2010 at Dwaraka Tirumala, W...
Mangalagiri Sai Vs. The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology Universi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.16378 of 2015 17-06-2015 Mangalagiri Sairam...Petitioner The Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University,Represented by its Registrar (Convener, EAMCET-2015),Hyderabad, Telangana State and others. ...Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Kiran Palakurthi Counsel for Respondents: G.P. for Home (TG) ?. Cases referred 1. AIR2000SC735(1) 2. (2011) 11 SCC1THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.16378 of 2015 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: To issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus -declaring the memo No.C No.5778 /A7/2013 dt. 28.1.2014 issued by 4th respondent in refusing to recognize the petitioner as the son of Police Martyr Late Shankar Jee and to grant Police Martyr Children Certificate to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and direct the respondents 3 and 4 to issue Police Martyr Children Certificate to th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »