Andhra Pradesh Court April 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Enkay Texofood Industries Ltd, Mumbai Re Vs. The State of andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Petition No.5195 of 2014 22-04-2015 Enkay Texofood Industries LTD.Mumbai Rep. by its Managing Director Tulsi Goyal and another...Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Public Prosecutor, and another. Respondents Counsel for Petitioners : Sr.I.V.Ramesh Counsel for Respondent No.1: Addl. Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.M. Shiva Kumar ?. Cases referred: 1) AIR2007SC17212) (2010) 8 SCC4233) AIR1959AP5684) AIR1958AP4185) (2013) 10 SCC758THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5195 of 2014 ORDER: In this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioners/A1 and A2 seek to quash the order dated 10.02.2014 in Crl.R.P.No.40 of 2012passed by learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad confirming the order dated 11.01.2012 in Crl.M.P.No.1 of 2011 in C.C.No.184 of 2011 passed by II Special Magistrate, Hasthinapuram, Ranga Reddy District. 2) The complainant filed C.C....
M/S. Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd., Thr Vs. M/S.Sujana Universal Indu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2015
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.P.No.169 of 2014 21-04-2015 M/s. Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd., Through its Authorised Signatory Mr.Soham Kumar.Petitioner. M/s.Sujana Universal Industries Limited .. Respondent. Counsel for the Appellant:Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, Advocate !Counsel for the Respondent: Sri A.Sudershan Reddy, Senior Advocate. ?. Cases referred 1 [2014]. 120 cla389 (Bom)=[2014].183CompCas395(Bom) 2 [2013].113CLA435(AP)=[2013].176CompCas483(AP). 3 [2006]. 133 Comp Cas (AP) 4 [1999].97CompCas947(AP)=(1999)2CompLJ31(AP) 5 AIR1997Andhra Pradesh 13 6 (1994) 3 Supreme Court Cases 348 7 2010 (4) ALD1168 [2001]. 103 Comp Cas 918 (Delhi) HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY Company Petition No.169 OF2014JUDGMENT: This Company Petition is filed by the petitioner, viz., M/s.Mauritius Commercial Bank Ltd., under Section 433(e), 434(1)(b) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company-M/s.Sujana Universal Industries Limited, a company incorpora...
Rabi Umamaheswara Rao S/O Subba Rao, Rac Vs. The State of andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-20-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO WP NO.10649 OF201520-4-2015 Rabi Umamaheswara Rao S/o SUbba Rao, Rachavaripalem village, Maddipadu Mandal,Prakasham District. Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Dept.,Hyderabad and othersRespondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.I Koti Redy Counsel for respondents : G.P.for Cooperation ?. Cases cited: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO W P No.10649 of 2015 Oral Order : Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Co-operation (A.P).and the learned counsel appearing for the CaveatORS.The petitioner is an agriculturist and he is one of the members of the Nandipadu Primary Agiculture Cooperative Society, Nandipadu, Maddipadu Mandal, Prakasham District (hereinafter referred to as the Society).The petitioner is said to be a prospective candidate to contest for the post of President of the said Society in the ensuing elections after being elected as a member of...
1. Yachamaneni Chandra Mohan Rao and Anot Vs. 1. Edmala Narsamma @ Nar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3243 of 2014 16-04-2015 1. Yachamaneni Chandra Mohan Rao & another...Petitioners 1. Edmala Narsamma @ Narsavva & 28 others...Respondents Counsel for Petitioners: Sri Bodduluri Srinivasa Rao Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2: Sri N. Ashok Kumar ?. Cases referred 1. 2012 (6) ALD36(SC) 2. (2009) 1 Supreme Court Cases 689 3. AIR1984Orissa 187 4. AIR1969Supreme Court 971 5. AIR1978Punjab and Haryana 216 6. 2014 (2) ALD1497. AIR1952Punjab 190 8. (1980) 3 Supreme Court Cases 565 9. AIR1926Lahore 563 HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V. SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3243 of 2014 Date: April 16, 2015 ORDER: The application which is the genesis for the present revision filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is one under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). In the present revision filed by the defendants 28 and 29 challenge is to the order dated 31.07.2014 passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Siricilla, ...
New India Assurance Company Limi Vs. Smt. Ummannagari Akkamma and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY MACMA No.706 OF201016-04-2015 New India Assurance Company Limited...Appellant Smt. Ummannagari Akkamma & Others...Respondents Counsel for Appellants: Sr.A. Ramakrishna Reddy ^Counsel for R.1 to R.4 & R.6: Smt.N.Sasikala Counsel for Respondent No.5: None ?. Cases referred (2001) 5 SCC1752 (2004) 5 SCC3853 (2009) 13 SCC7104 (2012) 2 SCC3565 2008 ACJ5946 2005 (4) ALD7257 2014 ACJ5268 2014 ACJ12309 2013 ACJ287010 2014 ACJ185911 2014 ACJ263812 2009 ACJ1298(SC) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY M.A.C.M.A.No.706 of 2010 JUDGMENT: 1 Assailing the award and judgment dated 10.12.2009 passed in M.V.O.P.No.624 of 2008 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District & Sessions Judge Anantapur wherein and whereby an amount of Rs.5,19,000/- was awarded as compensation as against the claim of Rs.6.00 lakhs, the second respondent insurer filed the present appeal. 2 For the sake of convenience, parties to this appeal will hereinafte...
D.J Vs. Ch.Krishna Reddy and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.75 of 2015 16-04-2015 D.JaipalPetitioner Ch.Krishna Reddy and another Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.Kiran Palakurthi !Counsel for the respondents: Sr.T.Surya Satish >Head note: ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.75 of 2015 Dated 16th April, 2015 The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 20.12.2013, in E.P.No.36 of 2013, in O.S.No.121 of 1993, on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. I have heard Sr.Kiran Palakurthi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sr.T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the respondents. The respondents filed O.S.No.121 of 1993 for specific performance of an agreement of sale against the petitioner. The said suit was decreed by the lower Court. The respondents have filed E.P.No.36 of 2013 for execution of the sale deed. The pe...
Y.Vinod Reddy and Othe Vs. Syed Ahmed Ali and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2015
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.M.A.No.951 of 2014 16-04-2015 Y.Vinod Reddy and others ---Appellants Syed Ahmed Ali and others Respondents Counsel for the appellants:Mr.V.L.N.G.K.Murthy for Mr.P.Venkat Reddy Counsel for the respondent No.1: Mr.O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for other respondents: -- : ?. Cases referred: AIR1954SC75THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.M.A.No.951 of 2014 16.04.2015 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of the order, dated 27.08.2014, in I.A.No.285 of 2014 in O.S.No.674 of 2014 on the file of learned XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. At the interlocutory stage, the civil miscellaneous appeal itself is taken up for hearing and disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties. Brief facts leading to the filing of the civil miscellaneous appeal are three persons i.e., P.Lachamma, D.Anji Reddy and K.Ramakrishna Reddy (respondent Nos.3 t...
In Re ? Vs. Sri Bandaru Madhava Naidu, Member of T
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SUO MOTU CONTEMPT CASE NO.2275 OF201415-04-2015 In Re Sr.Bandaru Madhava Naidu, Member of the Legislative Assembly, Narsapur, West Godavari District Respondent/Contemnor !Amicus Curiae: Sr.Vedula Srinivas Counsel for respondent: Sr.K. Chidambaram ?. CASES REFERRED: 1. 1997 (6) Andhra Law Times 420 (DB) 2. AIR1974SC7103. AIR1978SC7274. AIR1954SC105. AIR2011SC22756. (2002) 3 SCC3437. (1996) 5 SCC2168. AIR1954SC7439. (1991) 4 SCC40610. AIR1970SC2015THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sr.KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SUO MOTU CONTEMPT CASE NO.2275 OF2014DATED _________ APRIL, 2015 ORDER: (per Honble Sr.Justice Sanjay Kumar) The Principal District Judge, West Godavari, forwarded to the High Court the letter dated 25.08.2014 addressed by the Additional District Judge, Narsapur, to the Superintendent of Police, West Godavari, relating to an incident that occurred on 15.08.2014 involvin...
Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limit Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.29925 OF201215-04-2015 Rastriya Ispat Nigam Limited Petitioner Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax & another Respondents. Counsel for Petitioner :Ch.Pushyam Kiran Counsel for Respondents:B.Narasimha Sarma ?. Cases referred:1) AIR1995SC1133= (1995) 212 ITR639(SC) 2) AIR2007SC30053) 252 ITR2604) 231 ITR505) AIR1975SC16046) AIR1977SC8707) AIR1973SC22668) 198 ITR2979) AIR1987Supreme Court 793 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.29925 of 2012 ORAL ORDER: (per the Honble Sri Justice Dilip B.Bhosale) This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns a notice issued by the 1st respondent-Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) on 31.08.2012, proposing to rectify the concluded assessment for the Assessment Year 2005-06, as illegal, arbitrary a...
Smt. Dr. Renuka Datla and Oth Vs. Biological E Limited and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2015
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY Company Appeal No.17 of 2014 15-4-2015 Smt. Dr. Renuka Datla and others.. Appellants Biological E Limited and others.. Respondents Counsel for appellants : Mr. S.R. Ashok, Senior Counsel for M/s. Lakshmi Kumaran & Sridharan Counsel for respondent No.1 : Mr. P.S. Raman, Senior Counsel for Mr. M.V. Pratap Kumar Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Mr. S. Niranjan Reddy for Mr. J.Krishna Dev Counsel for respondent No.5: Counsel for respondent Nos.6 & 7 : Mr. D. Prakash Reddy, Senior Counsel for Mr. Y. Suryanarayana Counsel for respondent Nos.8 & 9 : Ms. Rubina S. Khatoon ?.CASES REFERRED:1. (1907(G) 1034)-(1907) 2 Ch. 370 2. 1976(47) Comp. Cases 693 (Madras) 3. (1991) 71 Comp. Cases 136 (Mad) 4. 1984(55) Comp. Cases 462 (Delhi) 5. 1971(41) Comp. Cases 371 6. AIR1964S.C. 1300 7. Manu/KA/2959/2013 8. 2012(4) ALD3859. AIR1961S.C. 1633 10. (2005) 11 SCC31411. AIR1955Madras 30 12. 1993(2) ALT15413. (1942) ILR21Patna 281 14. [1921]. 2 K.B.608. 15. (1940) ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »