Andhra Pradesh Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. The Commissioner for Work ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/Insurance Company requesting to call for the records and issue an order/direction or Writ, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, and quash the order dated 23.07.2009 in I.A.No.14 of 2009 in W.C.No.112 of 2008 and order dated 08.05.2009 passed in W.C.No.112 of 2008 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-IV, Hyderabad, and consequently declare that the writ petitioner is not liable for payment of compensation to the legal heirs/representatives of the deceased workman. 2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner/insurance company ( ˜the Insurance Company', for brevity) and the learned counsel for respondents 4 to 6 ( ˜the claimantsfor brevity), who are the legal representatives of the deceased workman. 3. The brief facts, which are necessary and relevant for consideration in this w...
K. Jayasree Vs. Singam Rao Sarath Chandra and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
Common Order: These two Civil Revision Petitions are being disposed of by this common order in view of common cause of action. The petitioner in both the revision petitions is a third party to O.S.No.1481 of 2013 pending on the file of VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The suit was filed by the 1st respondent herein against the 2nd respondent herein seeking perpetual injunction restraining the 2nd respondent and its employees from interfering with the possession of the 1st respondent-plaintiff. In the said suit, the revision petitioner filed two applications, I.A.No.4 of 2014 and I.A.No.5 of 2014 seeking to implead herself as the 2nd defendant/2nd respondent in the suit and in the interlocutory applications and when the said applications were dismissed by a common order dated 26-11-2014, the above civil revision petitions are filed. The case of the revision petitioner is that she is the absolute owner and possessor of premises bearing No.17-1-386/1/S/89, Keshava Nagar...
Medidhi Chakra Veni Vs. Kamisetti Venkata Ramanam and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-23-2015
Common Order: 1. The 7th respondent in A.S.No.196 of 2007 on the file of VI Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, East Godavari at Rajahmundry is the revision petitioner in these three revision cases. The predecessor-in-interest of 7th respondent, who was arrayed as 1st respondent in the appeal, was the original plaintiff. She filed O.S.No.525 of 2004 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry for partition of plaint schedule property into three equal shares and for allotment of 1/9th share to her. The said suit was decreed on 10-10-2007 and against the said judgment and decree, the defendants 2 to 6, 12 and 13 preferred A.S.No.196 of 2007. They filed three applications, I.A.No.806 of 2010, I.A.No.167 of 2010 and I.A.No.968 of 2009, to receive death certificate of one Kamisetty Bapanamma, to receive certified copy of judgment in O.S.No.615 of 2002 on the file of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry and to receive registration extract of sale deed executed b...
M/s. Sun Re-Rolling Mills and Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The District ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2015
Heard Dr. P.B. Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Agriculture for respondents. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is a private limited company. It has established a cold storage unit and applied for Capital Investment Subsidy under APSAMC Capital Investment Subsidy for Cold Storage Units/Chains. Accordingly, the 4th respondent sanctioned subsidy for a sum of Rs.34,93,000/- as per G.O.Ms.No.211, dated 2.07.1999 by obtaining agreement dated 12.01.2001 from the petitioner with structured conditions. As per Clause 10 of the said G.O., Cold Storage units set up in the State of Andhra Pradesh will be eligible for Capital Investment subsidy of 25% on power bills (both demand and energy) for a period of 3 years from the date of commencement of commercial production with a maximum total admissible rebate of Rs.30 lakhs. The rebate shall be allowed by the Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board in their monthly bills (vide G.O.Ms.No.10...
Kota Joji Vs. The Railway Protection Force (RPF), Rep. by its Sr. Div. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2015
1. The petitioner, Inspector in respondent No.1-Railway Protection Force (RPF), was trapped by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on 15-02-2015 and a case was booked against him on the ground that he demanded and accepted the bribe from a hawker for allowing him to sell eatables in the trains unauthorisedly. In this connection, the CBI, Visakhapatnam registered a case against the petitioner in R.C.No.1(A)/15 under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He was arrested on 15-02-2015 and was released on bail on 10-3-2015. He was placed under suspension by the Department with effect from 18-02-2015. The 1st respondent-RPF issued a charge-sheet dated 25-6-2015 against the petitioner under Rule 153 of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 (the RPF Rules, for short) framing Articles of Charge viz., (1) He demanded an amount of Rs.6,000/- as illegal gratification from Chitekala Gopi to allow him to continue unauthorised hawking (of selling of boiled palli) in trains, (...
Rambha Lakshmana Rao and Another Vs. The State of A.P., Rep. by Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2015
1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners/A.1 and A.2 under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No.38 of 2015 of Akiveedu Police Station, West Godavari District for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC, dated 14.01.2015, which is outcome of a report of the 2nd respondent-de facto complainant. 2. The 2nd respondent filed the private complaint dated 8.10.2014 on the file of II Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bhimavaram for the offence punishable under Section 420 IPC against the petitioners/A.1 and A.2 and the learned Magistrate referred the same under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., for investigation to the Station House Office, Akiveedu Police Station. 3. It is the sum and substance of the complaint that A.1 is the son-in-law of A.2, borrowed Rs.4,50,000/- on 27.02.2011 from the complainant and executed a demand pronote of even date to repay with interest, and after several demands for its repayment, A.1 postponing the same on one prete...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Yanamadala Sridevi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2015
1) The 3rd respondent to the claim petition is the appellant in the present appeal impugning the order dated 07.09.2009 in O.P. No.303 of 2006 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, East Godavari District at Rajahmundry. 2) For the sake of convenience the parties are arrayed herein as they are arrayed in the Tribunal. The 3rd respondent is the insurer of the tractor and trailer bearing Nos.AP 5V 381 and AP 5U 7743 belongs to the 2nd respondent driven by the 1st respondent. The other tractor bearing No.AP 5 AC 9587 belongs to the 5th respondent driven by the 4th respondent insured with the 6th respondent. 3) The claimants are wife, mother and two minor children of the deceased who is pillion rider is the bike which driven by P.W-3, who is an eye witness. P.W-3 reported the incident covered by Ex.A-1 F.I.R. The appellant/insurer claims that even the very F.I.R from report of P.W-3 vis- -vis his evidence in chief-affidavit before the Tri...
Lenka Adinarayana Vs. The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2015
1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking to quash the order dated 08.10.2012 passed in Crl.R.P.No.60 of 2011 by the Special Judge for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes(POA) Act-cum-Additional Sessions Judge at Vizianagaram, in a maintenance matter. 2. The quash petitioner is no other than the husband of the 2nd respondent and father of the 3rd respondent - minor. Respondents 2 and 3 filed the maintenance case in M.C.No.41 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Vizianagaram, under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The said case was allowed granting maintenance of Rs.1,000/- per month to the 3rd respondent from the date of maintenance application. After passing of the order, for recovery of arrears of maintenance for 21 months in lump sum, in a single application filed by the respondents 2 and 3 in Crl.M.P.No.2273 of 2011, the learned Magistrate, after hearing the petitioner that he is not prepared to pay the arrears a...
Ramdharma Reddy Vs. The Land Acquisition Officer (Revenue Divisional O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This appeal has been preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the Act') by the claimant, not being satisfied by the enhanced amount of compensation ordered to be paid by the Reference Court in O.P.No.281 of 1998. With a view to provide house sites to the weaker sections of the society, during the year 1995-1996 certain lands situate in Thorlikonda Village of Jakranpally Mandal, Nizamabad District, have been notified for compulsory acquisition and accordingly, notification under Sub Section 1 of Section 4 of the Act was got gazetted on 22.06.1996. The land of total extent of Ac.8.25 guntas has been acquired, out of this the claimant's land of an extent of Ac.3.00 guntas has also been acquired. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award fixing the market value at Rs.18,000/- per acre and thus, paid an amount of Rs.77,625/- as compensation. It is in those set of circumstances, when the appellant herein sought for compensation @ Rs.150/- ...
Arshanapalli Rambai Vs. State of Telngana rep. by its Public Prosecuto ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-18-2015
1. The petitioner Smt. A.Rambai, the A.2 in C.C.No.213 of 2015 is no other than the mother-in-law of R.2 (the defacto-complainant Smt. K.Priya). On the report of the defacto-complainant dated 20.01.2013 the police II town, Godavari Khani registered Cr.No.11 of 2013 for the offences punishable u/s 498-A of I.P.C. and u/sec.3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act(for short, the D.P.Act') against the accused and filed final referred report subsequently and the Magistrate on the protest application of the defacto-complainant supra following the procedure u/s.200 to 204 r/w 190 of Cr.P.C. vide docket order dated 26.03.2015, with reference to the sworn statements of the defacto-complainant and two more persons, taken cognizance against the petitioner and her son-A.1(husband of the defacto-complainant). The petitioner is now impugning the said order taken cognizance seeking to quash the proceedings. 2. The factual background speaks that the petitioner's son by name A.Vasantha Babu and the defact...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »