Andhra Pradesh Court October 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Munawar Khatoon and Others Vs. Mohd. Rafique Ahmed Khan and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for respondent No.1. This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners in F.C.O.P. (Sr).No.2004 of 2015 on the file of Family Court, Hyderabad, aggrieved by the docket order, dated 30.06.2015, passed in the said O.P.. The aforesaid O.P. is filed with the prayer, which reads as under: ..., petitioners humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may be please to pass the judgment and decree, i) Declaring that the 1st Petitioner is the legally wedded wife and the Petitioners No.2 and 3 are the sons and legal heirs of the Respondent and as such, except Petitioners and Respondent, no others are entitled to receive the pensionary benefits of the Respondent, who retired on 31-03-2015. ii) To award the Costs of the suit/petition. iii) Pass any such other order or orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. ? ...
Akula Sangappa Vs. Bandam Siddappa and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
1. This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( ˜the Code', for brevity) by the unsuccessful 2nd defendant is directed against the decree and judgment dated 02.08.2010 of the learned Principal District Judge, Sanga Reddy of Medak District passed in A.S.no.1 of 2008. The learned Principal District Judge while allowing the said first appeal had set aside the decree and judgment dated 20.12.2007 of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sangareddy passed in O.S.No.407 of 2003 and had decreed the said suit for perpetual injunction filed by the sole plaintiff against the defendants 1 and 2 in respect of Ac.1.33 guntas in Sy.No.334/A/1 and another Ac.1.33 guntas in Sy.No.334/A/2 totally admeasuring Ac.3.26 guntas at Munipally village and Mandal of Medak District more fully described in the schedule annexed to the plaint. 2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant/2nd defendant ( ˜the 2nd defendant', for brevity) and ...
Sardar Inder Singh Sokki and Others Vs. M/s. Geetha Enterprises, rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
Common Judgment: 1. Aggrieved by the common judgment dt: 23.01.2006 in O.S.No.152 of 1995 and O.S.No.339 of 1993 passed by learned III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, the defendants 1, 2 and 4 to 6 in O.S.No.152 of 1995/plaintiffs 1 to 5 in O.S.No.339 of 1993 preferred CCCA No.84 of 2006 against the judgment in O.S.No.152 of 1995 and Tr.CCCA No.25 of 2015 against the judgment in O.S.No.339 of 1993. 2. The factual matrix of the suit O.S.No.152 of 1995 is thus: a) The plaintiffs 2 and 3 and defendant No.7 originally formed a partnership firm and registered in 1982 under the name and style of 1st plaintiff i.e, M/s. Geetha Enterprises with 2nd plaintiff as its Managing Partner. The defendant No.7 left the partnership firm on 01.07.1985. The plaintiffs 2, 3 and defendant No.7 obtained 5000 sq.yds of open land in Sy.No.35, situated at Zamisthanpur, Seethaphalmandi, Secunderabad on lease under registered lease deed dt:27.02.1982 and registered on 11.03.1982 from defendant...
Kosaraju Balaji Vs. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Princip ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2015
This Writ Petition is filed for a certiorari to call for the records relating to order dated 23-6-2014 of respondent No.2 in Case No.D1/1388/2014, whereby he has confirmed the order of respondent No.3 in Case No.C/1488/2014, dated 23-6-2014 and to quash the said orders. The case of the petitioner is that Vadde Jangaiah and Vadde Sathaiah were paternal cousins; that apart from other properties, the said Jangaiah and Sathaiah owned agricultural land of Ac.4-00 in Sy.No.304 of Poppalaguda village, Rajendranagar Mandal; that they shared the said land equally through settlement dated 27-2-1998 and consequently pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of Ac.2-00 each were issued; that after the death of Vadde Sathaiah, respondent Nos.9 to 11, being his wife and sons, inherited the said property; and that the names of respondent Nos.9 to 11 have been mutated in the revenue records in respect of the said property from 1997-98. That the petitioner has purchased Ac.2-00 in Sy.No.304/AA of ...
Rajamoori Ram Reddy and Others Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep., b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
Common Judgment: (Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J.) Since both these appeals are directed against the judgment and sentence rendered by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, (Fast Track Court), Mahabubnagar, in Sessions Case No.7 of 2009, dated 16.06.2010, we heard them together. Crl.A.No.806 of 2010 was preferred by accused No.2, while Crl.A.No.909 of 2010 was preferred by accused Nos.1 and 3. The case of the prosecution is that PW1, the complainant and the deceased, his brother-in-law, went out to consult a lawyer, who is prosecuting one of the cases, in which the deceased was interested. Around 9.45 p.m after the consultation work with the advocate was over, they were returning via clock tower area. It is PW1, who was riding the motorcycle, while the deceased was riding as a pillion. The deceased seems to have suggested to PW1 to stop the motorcycle and go to nearby chips shop to buy the same. Accordingly, PW1 stopped his motor cycle, went to a nearby shop, purchased chips and whil...
K. Ramachandran and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-2015
Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J. This Writ Appeal is preferred by third parties seeking leave of this Court to prefer the Writ Appeal against the interim order granted by the learned Single Judge of this Court while issuing notice before admission in the main Writ Petition No. 26558 of 2015. The interim direction granted by the learned Single Judge is as follows: In the meantime, there shall be interim direction to the 3rd respondent to take necessary steps to examine the issue of fixation of seniority of the Deputy Superintendent of Police (Dy. SPs.) by reviewing G.O.Ms.No. 108, Home Department, dated 23.06.2014, with reference to the grievance of the direct recruiters of Dy. SPS., and promoted Dy. SPs., as requested by the Director General of Police, in R.C.No. 54 No. 254.GB/2014, dated 29.04.2015l as expeditiously as is possible. ? The writ petitioners are stated to be directly recruited Deputy Superintendents of Police. They have already approached the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribuna...
A. Ravinder Reddy and Others Vs. Telangana State Road Transport Corpor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent-Corporation. The petitioners 1 to 3 are Head Constables and the petitioners 4 to 6 are constables in the respondent-Corporation. They formed TSRTC Security Staff Welfare Association, which was registered under the Societies Registration Act. The first petitioner was elected as President of the said association on 26.04.2015 and intimation regarding election of members of the association was sent to the respondent-Corporation. There are 400 members in the Association. After bifurcation of the State of Andhra Pradesh, a separate association by name Telangana RTC Security Staff Welfare association was formed. As per the bye-laws of the Association, outsiders also can be elected as office bearers and accordingly, one Prabhakar Rao was elected as Zonal Chief Adviser. Subsequently, he was elected as the State Honorary President. The 2nd petitioner is working as the State Vice Preside...
Padi Pratap Reddy Vs. The District Collector, Warangal and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-2015
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.3 in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land admeasuring Acs.10.00 in survey No.1098 of Narsapur Village, Venkatapur Mandal, Warangal District, and causing damage to the standing crop therein as well as bore-well, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent Nos.3 to 5 to grant compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- to him. The petitioner averred that his father was a freedom fighter. That having recognized his father's services to the Nation during the freedom struggle, the State Government allotted an extent of Acs.10.00 in survey No.1098 of Narsapur Village, vide proceedings No.B/1500/89 of the Mandal Revenue Officer, Venkatapur Mandal, Warangal District, dated 16.02.1997. That during the life time of his father, he was cultivating the said land and after his death in the year 2007, the petitioner has been cultivating the sam...
Nade Ali Mirza and Others Vs. Khalida Mohammed Salim Dawawala and Othe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-2015
1. This Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.31-07-2012 in O.S.No.324 of 2011 of the Principal District Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad. THE SUIT 2. The petitioners herein are plaintiffs in the above suit. They filed the said suit against respondent Nos.1 to 143 for the following reliefs: (a) for a perpetual injunction restraining them from interfering with the alleged peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the plaint schedule property and also not to alienate the same to any third party; and (b) to declare 107 registered sale deeds and agreements of sale “cum-GPAs mentioned therein which were registered in the office of the Sub Registrar, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District as null and void. 3. The subject matter of the suit is an extent of Ac.39.11 gts. in Sy. Nos.310, 311 and 312 of Budwel village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. 4. The petitioners valued the relief of pe...
Kiran Bansal Vs. T. Chandra Kala and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-27-2015
1. Heard Sri M.A.K.Mukheed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Bal Chand, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. This Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dt.26-09-2014 in I.A.No.215 of 2013 in R.C.No.277 of 2008 of the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad. 3. Petitioner herein is the tenant of the respondent in respect of a non-residential premises /shop bearing No.4-2-577/1, Badichowdi, Sultan Bazaar, Hyderabad. 4. The respondents, who are mother and daughter, filed R.C.No.277 of 2008 on 18-08-2008 before the I Additional Rent Controller, City Civil Court, Hyderabad seeking eviction of the petitioner on the grounds of (i) willful default in payment of rents from June 2008 to August 2008, (ii) alleged unauthorized subletting of a portion of the R.C. schedule premises by erecting a kiosk, (iii) Creating nuisance, (iv) bona fide personal need and requirement of the respondents, (v) the petitioner has secured altern...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »