Andhra Pradesh Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd.Rep. by I Vs. M. Nageshwar Rao and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.267 of 2009 01-09-2014 United India Insurance Co.Ltd.Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Hyderabad and another..Appellants M. Nageshwar Rao and others.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.N. Mohan Krishna Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Sr.A. Raghu Rama Aurava ^Counsel for Respondent No.5 : Sr.Mohd. Abdul Samad : ?. Cases referred: 1. 2009 ACJ1298(SC) HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.267 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 06.12.2007 in M.V.O.P.No.1342 of 2005 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- Principal District Judge, Warangal (for short the Tribunal).the United India Insurance Company Limited preferred the instant appeal. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) Claimants 1 to 3, who are the father, mother and sister of the deceasedBalaraju, filed M.V.O.P.No.1342 of 2005 on the pleas that on 08.06.2005 when the deceased along with one M.Chandraiah was proceeding on ...
Jambapuram Sudharshan Vs. the A.P.S.R
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.551 of 2006 01-09-2014 Jambapuram Sudharshan ReddyAppellant The A.P.S.R.T.C.Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:D.Kodanda Rami Reddy, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents:K.Subba Reddy, Advocate : : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.551 of 2006 JUDGMENT:- Dissatisfied with the award of compensation of Rs.85,000/- out of the total claim of Rs.4,00,000/- by order dated 22.12.2005 passed in M.V.O.P.No.240 of 2003 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Cuddapah, (the Tribunal, for brevity).the claimant preferred this appeal. The appellant herein is the claimant and the respondent herein is the respondent before the Tribunal and for the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as per their array before the Tribunal. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- On 20.05.2002, at about 04:00 PM, the claimant along with some others boarded an auto bearing regi...
K. Narasai Vs. M. Sreedhar Reddy and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR MACMA No.2042 of 2006 01-09-2014 K. Narasaiah .. Appellant M. Sreedhar Reddy and another .. Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sri M. Subrahmanyam Counsel for respondent No.1 : --- Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri N. Mohan Krishna HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED :1. (2013) 9 SCC54THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A. No.2042 of 2006 Judgment: Aggrieved by the award dated 31.08.2005 passed in OP No.236 of 2004 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Nellore, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.60,000/-, with interest at 7.5% p.a., from the date of petition till realization, out of the claim of Rs.2,00,000/-, the claimant filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The brief facts of the case are as follows. That on 12.04.2003 the claimant and others were engaged an ...
Mir Zaheer Mohammed Vs. M/S Legend Estates Private Limited Rep.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-01-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.1506 of 2013 01-09-2014 Mir Zaheer Mohammed Khan..petitioner M/s Legend Estates Private Limited Rep. by its Managing Director, Hyderabad..Respondent !Counsel for the respondent: Sr.S. Ashok Anand Kumar, Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.Kishore Rai HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.1506 of 2013 ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.1597 of 2008 in the Court of V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the petitioner for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. In the plaint, the respondent has traced its rights vis--vis the property, to certain proceedings in O.S.No.199/1 of 1952. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1298 of 2008, under Rule 128 of Civil Rules of Practice, with a prayer to call for the entire record in E.P.No.37 of 1961 on the file of the Court of the Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, together with the letter dated 09-...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›