Andhra Pradesh Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pothina Venkateswara Swa Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ce
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA Nos.125 OF2002and batch 05-09-2014 Pothina Venkateswara Swamy..APPELLANTS Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle,Vijayawada RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants: Sr.Challa Gunaranjan Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.J.V.Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred (2008) 305 ITR227(SC) 2 (2010) 323 ITR577(Bom) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA Nos.125 AND126OF200205-09-2014 COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) These two appeals are interrelated. The respective appellants are brotheRs.They are assessees under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).They jointly constructed a godown near Suryapalem Village of Vijayawada between 1991 and 1992. In the returns filed by the appellants for the corresponding yeaRs.the cost of construction that fell to their share was shown as Rs.25,50,853/- each. It is stated that a report of val...
Smt.K. Vs. Hanumaiah Goud and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2528 of 2014 05-09-2014 Smt.K.Rani..Petitioners Hanumaiah Goud and another.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.MVS.Suresh Kumar Counsel for the respondents:None appeared : Cases referred : AndhWR-1973-2-253 The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2528 of 2014 Dated 05.09.2014 The Court made the following: Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 31.01.2013, in IA.No.743 of 2012 in OS.No.713 of 1994, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad (for short the lower Court).At the hearing, none appeared for the respondents though the name of Mr.N.Jagan Reddy is shown as their Counsel in the cause list. I have heard Mr.M.V.S.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner filed the above-mentioned suit initially for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interferin...
Gorige Ailamm Vs. Utkoori Somaiah and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Second Appeal Nos.1385 of 2005 and batch 05-09-2014 Gorige Ailamma ..Appellant Utkoori Somaiah and others .Respondents Counsel for Appellant :Sr.S. Ramachandra Prasad Counsel for respondents:Sr.K.B.Ramanna Dora HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : 1. 2014(2) ALD7242. 2014(2) ALD157SC) 3. 2014(2) ALD103SC) 4. 2014(1) ALD15. 1996(6) ALD1406. AIR2002SC8127. AIR1990Orissa 124 8. AIR1987Delhi 36 9. AR2002Rajasthan 66 THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Second Appeal Nos.1385, 1554 and 1665 of 2005 Common Judgment: Since the issues involved in all the Second Appeals are common in nature they are being disposed of by this common judgment. SA No.1385 of 2005 is filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2005 passed in A.S.No.4 of 1998 by the Senior Civil Judge, Jangaon, whereby and whereunder the judgment and decree dated 06.04.1998 passed in OS No.48 of 1982 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Jangaon, Warangal District has been reversed. SA No.1554 of 20...
Dr.Aneel K Vs. Dr.Jaya Ch
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.152 of 2007 05-09-2014 Dr.Aneel Kaur...APPELLANT Dr.Jaya ChandraRESPONDENT Counsel for appellant: Ms. S. Vani Counsel for respondent.: Sri M.R. Harsha HEAD NOTE: ?. Case referred:1997. (2) APLJ103HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.152 of 2007 and CROSS-OBJECTIONS (Sr.) No.29318 of 2008 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Justice R. Subhash Reddy) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, in F.C.A.No.152 of 2007 is filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 by the petitioner in I.A.No.664 of 2006 in F.C.O.P.No.260 of 1997, aggrieved by the order dated 07.09.2007 passed by the Family Court, Hyderabad.2. For the purpose of disposal, we refer to the parties as arrayed before the Family Court.3. By the aforesaid order, the Family Court allowed the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking ...
The Collector of Central Exci Vs. Fenoplast L
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.E.R.C.Nos.7 of 2000 and batch 04-09-2014 The Collector of Central Excise....Petitioner Fenoplast Ltd.Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.V.Gopala Krishna Gokhaley Counsel for respondent : --- HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.E.R.C.Nos.7 of 2000 & 1 of 2001 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.These reference cases are filed by the Central Excise Department under Section 35G(3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short the Act).The genesis of these cases is a bit complicated. The respondent is a manufacturing unit and it is an assessee of the Central Excise Duty. One of the products manufactured by it is rexin cloth. The excise duty was being levied upon it by treating the rexin cloth as a product falling under Clause 19(iii) of Schedule-I to the Central Excise Tariff Act (for short the Tariff Act).The respondent ma...
Guggilla Raja Narsim Vs. the District Collector, Karimnagar Distr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.23246 of 2014 04-09-2014 Guggilla Raja Narsimulu...Petitioner The District Collector, Karimnagar District cum Election Authority, Karimnagar & others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.K. Venu Madhav Counsel for the Respondent 1: GP for Revenue (Telangana) Counsel for Respondents 2 to 5 : GP for Prohibition & Excise (Telangana) HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.23246 of 2014 ORDER: Some of the members of the Toddy Tappers Cooperative Society, Metpally, Karimnagar District appear to have represented to the Deputy Election Authority-cum-Prohibition & Excise Superintendent, Jagtial that if the election is conducted by the method of showing the hands, those who are not favourably disposed towards some people are being routinely subjected to threats and hence, prayed for conducting the election by secret ballot method. Learned counsel for the petitioner Sr.Venumadhav...
K.Yogender Reddy and Anot Vs. Smt.K.Usha Rani and 2 Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.4410 of 2013 04-09-2014 K.Yogender Reddy and another.Petitioners Smt.K.Usha Rani and 2 others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Mr.R.Satyanarayana Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr.Vivek Chandrasekhar.S Counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 3: Ms.N.Niyatha : Cases referred : ---- The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.4410 of 2013 Dated 04.09.2014 The Court made the following: Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 31.07.2013, in IA.No.100 of 2013 in OS.No.308 of 2006, on the file of the Court of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District (for short the lower Court).whereby the application, filed by the petitioners for impleadment of respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein as defendant Nos.2 and 3 in the suit, was dismissed. The petitioners have filed the abovementioned suit (i) for declaration of their title in respect of plot No.112 admeasuring 1...
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Vs. N.Aravind R
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA WRIT APPEAL Nos.2269 OF2005AND BATCH0409-2014 The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Gandhinagar, Gujarat and anotherAppellant s..APPELLANTS N.Aravind Reddy RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants: Sr.S.S.Varma (Writ Appeal No.2269 of 2005) Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.P. Raja Sripada Rao (Writ Appeal No.2269 of 2005) HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL Nos.2269 AND2365OF200504-09-2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) These two writ appeals arise out of order dated 19-07-2005 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.15028 of 1999. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the writ petition. The petitioner was appointed as a Constable in the Central Reserve Police force (CRPF) on 28-10-1991. He was sanctioned leave for a period of two ...
Prakash Rao Da Vs. Satyanarayana Dandgey and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-04-2014
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4145 of 2010 04-09-2014 Prakash Rao DandgeyPetitioner Satyanarayana Dandgey and others Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.Prabhakar Sripada !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sr.D.L.N.Goud for Sr.Sridhar Lendalay Head note: ?. Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.4145 of 2010 Dated 04th September, 2014 The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 16.07.2010, in I.A.No.607 of 2010 in O.S.No.984 of 2002, on the file of the learned III Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC).Ranga Reddy District. I have heard Sr.Prabhakar Sripada, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sr.D.L.N.Goud, learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2. The above-mentioned suit was filed by respondent No.2 for declaration that gift settlement deed, dated 06.02.2001, executed in favour of the petitioner is null and void and for con...
Smt. K. Vijaya Laks Vs. G. Nageshwara Reddy and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.R.P.No.2950 of 2014 03-09-2014 Smt.K.Vijaya Lakshmi.Petitioner G. Nageshwara Reddy and others .Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Sr.C. Hanumantha Rayudu Counsel for respondents: --- HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.R.P.No.2950 of 2014 Order: This CRP is filed against the docket order dated 22.08.2014 passed in IA No.1122 of 2014 in OS No.361 of 2014 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool. The petitioner in this revision is the plaintiff in the suit. She filed the suit against the respondents herein for permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property i.e., the land admeasuring 561.11 sq. yards bearing plot No.2 in Survey No.920/1, situated at Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool District, within Kurnool Municipal Corporation limits, 69th Ward with specific boundaries. As seen from the stamps of the Court below the said suit was filed on 23.06.2014. Along with that suit the peti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »