Andhra Pradesh Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cherlapalli Yellamma and OThe Vs. Shaik HussaIn and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.561 of 2005 11-09-2014 Cherlapalli Yellamma and others .Appellants Shaik Hussain and others .Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.Ch. Dhanamjaya Counsel for respondents : Sr.Srinivasa Rao Vutla HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : 1. 2013(1) ALD622THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.561 of 2005 Judgment: Challenging the part of the award, dated 17.10.2003, passed in OP No.207 of 1995 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, West Godavari District, Eluru, that went against them holding that the 6th respondent-United India Insurance Company herein is not liable to pay compensation to them, the claimants filed the present appeal. It is not necessary to refer all the details of this case, suffice to say that two vehicles bearing No.AP-04T-1070 and the vehicle bearing No.AIK5758are involved in the accident. The FIR allegations go to show that the driver of the lorry bearing No.AP-04T-1070 drove ...
K. Jayaraj,s/O.Late K. Bheemachary,aged, Vs. the Executive Officer,can ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2014
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.2467 of 2005 11-09-2014 K. Jayaraj,S/o.late K. Bheemachary,Aged, 57 years, Occ: Foreman,R/o.H.No.2, Sri Hanumanjee Colony,Tarbund, Secunderabad 500 009 . Appellant The Executive Officer,Cantonment Board, Secunderabad Cantonment, Court Compound,Secunderabad. Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: SRI R.K. SURI Counsel for Respondent No.1: SRI DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: : : ?. Cases referred: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.2467 of 2005 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The petitioner in W.P.No.10650 of 2004 filed this Writ Appeal feeling aggrieved by the dismissal thereof by the learned Single Judge through order dated 02.08.2005. The appellant joined the services of the Cantonment Board, Secunderabad, in the year 1972, as Foreman, for the purpose of mainta...
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 126, Sar Vs. Epuri Prithvisen Re
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.32 of 2014 10-09-2014 Indian Oil Corporation Limited, 126, Sarojinidevi Road, Secunderabad, Rep.by its Senior Divisional Manager.Petitioner Epuri Prithvisen Reddy..Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.C.A.R.SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the respondent: Sr.AADESH VARMA : : ?. Cases Referred: 1. (2002) 6 SCC3312. (2007) 5 SCC6143. (2006) 1 SCC228IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.32 of 2014 JUDGMENT: This second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 25.10.2013 in A.S.No.52/2010 passed by the 1st Additional District Judge, Warangal whereunder and whereby the decree and judgment in O.S.No.181 of 2006 dated 27.01.2010 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Warangal is confirmed. I have heard Sr.C.A.R.Seshagiri Rao, learned coun...
Venkatrayapuram Industrial Area Township Vs. Government of A.P.Rep., b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.9784 OF201309-09-2014 Venkatrayapuram Industrial Area Township rep., by its Member and Temporary Chairman Sr.K. Rama Seshayya and others . Petitioners Government of A.P.rep., by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department and otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sr.M.R.K.Chakravarthy, Learned Counsel Counsel for respondents: Learned Special Government Pleader for Learned Advocate General; Sr.B.D.Maheswara Reddy; Sr.K. Chidambaram and Sr.Dasari SVversus Prasad. HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (2001) 2 SCC1602) (1981) 1 SCC5683) AIR1962SC10444) (2003) 6 SCC2305) (2005) 10 SCC4956) AIR1997SC1125= (1997) 3 SCC2617) AIR1999SC17238) 1995 Suppl (3) SCC6439) (1999) 6 SCC46410) (1999) 6 SCC66711) (1982) 3 SCC235 1982 SCC (L&S) 275 12) 2005(4) Laws (APHC) 106 13) (2002) 1 SCC3314) (1992) 4 SCC30515) (1988) 4 SCC22616) (2000) 7 SCC55217) ...
Mr.Vijay Ma Vs. M/S.G.M.R. Hyderabad International Airpo
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos.1798 OF2014and batch 09-09-2014 Mr.Vijay Mallya Petitioner M/s.G.M.R. Hyderabad International Airport Ltd., Rep. by its Manager, Legal, Ms. Jayanthi Talluri, w/o. B.V. Ramesh Chander and another Respondents Counsel for the petitioner:Sri H. Sudhakar Rao Counsel for Respondents:Sri S. Niranjan Reddy : ?. Cases referred:01. (2011) 2 SCC77202. (2001) Crl.L.J.-4250 03. AIR1977SC218504. (1977) 4 SCC55105. (2013) 7 SCC78906. (1980) 1 SCC4307. (1983) 1 SCC1THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE Nos. 1798 & 1799 OF2014Common Order: These revisions, under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., are filed by the petitioners against the orders, dated 13.08.2014, in Crl.M.P. Nos.1430 and 1435 of 2014 respectively in C.C. No.102 of 2014 on the file of III Special Magistrate, Hyderabad. 02. The petitioners are A.2 and A.3 among three accused including A.1 entity, M/s. Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Crim...
Gandhi Ranga Vs. the Deputy General Manager,state Bank of
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.2331 of 2005 09-09-2014 Gandhi Ranga Rao ..Appellant The Deputy General Manager,State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Tirupathi & another..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Ms.S.Pranathi Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.E. Madan Mohan Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1) (1998) 7 SCC842) (1995) 6 SCC1573) (1993) 4 SCC727THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.2331 of 2005 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.6353 of 2004 is the appellant. The learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition through order dated 03-08-2005. The facts relevant to the case, in brief, are as under: The petitioner was appointed as a Clerk-cum-Cashier in the State Bank of India in the year 1985, on being selected. From the date of appointment till 27-11-1999, he worked in the Duvvur Branch in...
The Commissioner of Income Ta Vs. M/S.Lakshmi Constructi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.93 of 2003 09-09-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax...APPELLANT M/s.Lakshmi Constructions...RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:- Sr.J.V.Prasad COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Sr.Y.Ratnakar : ?.Cases Referred: 1.(2010) 328 ITR513(SC) 2.(2013) 359 ITR398(P&H) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.93 of 2003 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The respondent is a firm and is assessed to tax. In its returns submitted for the year 1991-92, it has disclosed a sum of Rs.23,75,000/- towards cost of construction of a building. Incidentally, the firm was maintaining books of account. During the couRs.of processing the returns, the Assessing Officer referred the matter to a Valuer, who, in turn, reported that the estimated cost of the building is Rs.41,33,000/-. Taking the same into account, the Assessing Officer added a sum of Rs.17,4...
Sk. HussaIn Vs. the State of A.P, Rep. by Inspector of P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Appeal No.487 of 2006 05-09-2014 Sk. Hussain....Appellant The State of A.P, Rep. by Inspector of Police, ACB, Nizamabad. Respondent Counsel for Appellant : Sr.A.R.Samudrala Counsel for Respondent : Sr.R. Ramachandra Reddy Spl. Public Prosecutor for ACB : ?. Cases referred: 1) (2001) 1 SCC691= AIR2001SC318HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.487 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by Accused Officer (AO) aggrieved by the judgment dated 14.03.2006 in C.C.No.28 of 2001 passed by learned Principal Special Judge for SPE and ACB cases, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, convicting him for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short P.C Act) and sentencing him to suffer RI for one year and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to suffer SI for three months on fiRs.count and also sentencing him to suffer RI for two years and pay fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default to ...
M/S.idealdetonators Private Limi Vs. the Government Oftelangana Rep., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLR Sr.JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTY WRIT PETITION NO.23071 OF201405-09-2014 M/s.Ideal Detonators Private Limited .Petitioner The Government of Telangana rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad and three others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.M.V.J.K.Kumar Counsel for respondents: Sr.J. Anil Kumar, Spl. Standing Counsel for CT. HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) Vol. 49 APSTJ2462) 2011 (53) APSTJ13) 55 APSTJ1374) Order in W.P.No.15384 of 2013 dated 17.09.2013 5) Judgment in TREVC No.156 of 2013 dated 02.04.2014 6) Vol. 55 APSTJ537) 135 STC2658) (2013) 10 SCC6559) (2014) 6 SCC39710) (2001) 7 SCC7111) (2002) 4 SCC23412) AIR1960SC93613) 1990 (Supp) SCC157 14) (1991).SCC13915) (1994) 1 An .W.R.450 (FB) 16) (2004)11 SCC2617) (1975) 2 SCC23218) 2001(1) ALT438(D.B) 19) (2006) 4 SCC120) (1989) 2 SCC75421) AIR1955Andhra 87 (FB) 22) (1980) 3 SCC71923) (1992) 1 SCC48924) (1999) 7 SCC29...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iii, Hyde Vs. Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd., Hyde ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-05-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA No.150 OF200205-09-2014 Commissioner of Income Tax-III, HyderabadAppellant Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd., Hyderabad ..Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.S.R.Ashok, Senior Counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.Vijay Ashrit HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. 216 ITR7592. 254 ITR6063. (2006) 2 SCC508HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY ITTA No.150 OF200205-09-2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The respondent is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the Act).For the assessment year 1979- 80, it paid advance tax of Rs.38,00,000/-. However, in the regular assessment, the tax liability was fixed at a lower figure. Thereby, the respondent became entitled to be refunded the amount. There was a dispute as to the period for which interest must be paid on the refundable amount. Ultimately, in relation to the claim of the respondent, th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »