Andhra Pradesh Court September 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalvakolanu Tarakamma and Oth Vs. Pulichintala Narsimha Re
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.NO.870 of 1993 26-09-2014 Kalvakolanu Tarakamma And others.. Appellants Pulichintala Narsimha Reddy.. Respondent Counsel for the Appellants :Sri T.S.Anand, Sri VLNGK Murthy Sri T.Srinivasa Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri J.Prabhakar : : ?.Cases referred:1. 2011 (3) ALT1372. AIR1981S.C., 2085 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL A.S.NO.870 of 1993 This appeal is filed by the defendant(s) against the Judgment and decree, dated 26-02-1993 in O.S.No.65 of 1988 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Miryalaguda.2. The averments of the case in brief are as under:- The suit was filed by the plaintiff for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 03-10-1985, alleged to be executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff avers that he and the husband of the defendant, by name Ramanadham are close friends. In July, 1985, the said Ramanadham proposed to sell about 1150 Sq.Yds., of open site in Sy.No.193, situated at Huzurnagar...
Dr.S.P.Shiani and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. Bythe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.17918 of 2014 25-09-2014 Dr.S.P.Shiani & others. ..Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by the Secretary, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (E1) Department & others...Respondents. For petitioners:Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel. For Respondent No.1 : G.P. for Health, Medical & Family Welfare. For Respondent No.2 : Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, StandingCounsel. For Respondent No.3 : Dammalapati Srinivas, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana, Senior Counsel. For Respondents 5 to 7 : Sri S.Satyam Reddy, Senior Counsel. : ?. CITATIONS:1. 1998) 6 SCC1312. (2005) 2 SCC653. (2005) 6 SCC5374. (2012) 7 SCC3895. (2001) 8 SCC6646. (1999) 7 SCC1207. (1998) 6 SCC1318. 1986 (Supp) SCC5439. AIR1964SC18231) HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY And HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.17918 of 2014 ORDER : (Per Justice R.Subhash Reddy) In this writ petit...
M. Vs. the Presiding Officer, Labour Court-i, C
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL Nos.1367 OF2014and batch 25-09-2014 M.GopalAppellant The Presiding Officer, Labour Court-I, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad and two others ..Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sr.P. Sridhar Rao Counsel for the Respondents : Sr.Ramakanth Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. (1964) A.C.40 2. (1985) 3 SCC545HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL Nos.1367 AND1366OF201425-09-2014 COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This case can be in a way taken as reincarnation of Ridge v. Baldwin , which became the watermark for the principles of natural justice, in the field of administrative law. Both the appeals arise out of the order, dated 27.09.2013, passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.22773 of 2000. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the writ petition. Briefly stated, the facts are that; the...
M/S.Rajkumar Engineering Pvt. Lt Vs. the State of Andhrapradesh Rep. b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN ANDTHE HONBLR Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY TAX REVISION CASE Nos.254 of 2001 and batch 24-09-2014 M/s.Raj Kumar Engineering PVT.LTD.Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its State Representative before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nampally, Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S.Dwarakanath Counsel for respondent: Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes HEAD NOTE: ?. Citations: 1. (1970) 25 STC2112. (1977) 40 STC4973. (1960) 11 STC7344. (1972) 2 SCC5605. AIR1963SC2176. 1971 AIR20397. (2001) 5 SCC5198. (2001) 4 SCC5349. (2003) 1 SCC69210. AIR1990SC174711. AIR1966SC167812. (1984) 2 SCC50013. (2001) 8 SCC6114. (2003) 5 SCC13415. 2005 (1) SCJ18716. (2003) 2 SCC45517. (2004) 11 SCC62518. AIR1987SC3319. AIR1992SC9620. (2001) 4 SCC13921. (2001) 3 SCC735THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY TAX REVISION CASE Nos.254 & 285 of 2001 Common Order: (per Honble Sr....
The Divisional Manager,new India Assuran Vs. Gaddamidi Papaiah, S/O Ba ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.483 of 2005 and BATCH2409-2014 The Divisional Manager,New India Assurance Company Limited,Nizamabad. Appellant Gaddamidi Papaiah, S/o Balaiah and another. Respondents ^Counsel for the Appellant: Ms.I.Maamu Vani !Counsel for the respondents: Sr.Venkateshwar Varanasi Head note: ?. Cases referred: 1. 2005 (1) ALT6372. Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) Nos.14540-14541 of 2005, dated 13.10.2006 THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.483 of 2005 and 1626 of 2004 Dated 24th September, 2014 The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: C.M.A.No.483 of 2005 is filed by the Insurance Company against award, dated 27.01.2004, in W.C.No.79 of 1999 (NF) on the file of the learned Commissioner for Workmens Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Nizamabad (for short the Commissioner) feeling aggrieved by award of Rs.75,833/- towards compensation in favour of Gaddamidi Papaiah, S/o Bal...
Gullampudi Veera Nagam Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-24-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY CRL.P.No.8472 OF201124-09-2014 Gullampudi Veera Nagamani...Petitioner State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor And another. Respondents Counsel for Petitioner : Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati Counsel for the 1st respondent : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the 2nd respondent: Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred (2009) 11 SCC892 (2010) 2 SCC6313 (2012) 1 SCC1304 AIR1960SC8665 AIR1992SC604THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8472 of 2011 ORDER:1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Cr.No.307 of 2011 on the file of III Town Police Station, Rajahmundry, registered for the offences punishable under sections 463, 464, 465, 468, 471 and 420 IPC. 2 The facts leading to the filing of the present petition, briefly, are as follows: The 2nd respondent, Malla Maridabbai and Malla Veera Eswara Rao, who are owners of an extent of Ac.2-50 cents in...
M/S Sri Saikrupa Industries, Kaloor Vill Vs. Food Corporation of India ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.17945 of 2010 23-9-2014 M/s Sri Saikrupa Industries, Kaloor village, Nizamabad district, rep. by its Partner C.Ramesh and others...Petitioners Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, 3rd floor, HACA Bhavan, Opp: Public Gardens, Hyderabad, rep. by its General Manager and others... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri R.SUDHEER Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 : Sri B.ANJANEYULU Standing Counsel for F.C.I. Counsel for Respondents 3 & 4 : G.P. for Civil Supplies Gist: : ?. Cases referred:1. 2007(1) ALD4962.(2000) 6 SCC2933.(2013) 5 SCC470THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.17945 of 2010 ORDER: This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed, seeking to declare the action of the Food Corporation of India in recovering the amounts on account of non payment of Minimum Support Price (MSP) for Non FAQ paddy as arbitrary, illegal, ultravires and unconstitutional and violative of the Petitioners' righ...
M/S. Tata Project Limited, Supply ChaIn Vs. M/S. Offshore Infrastructu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-23-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR C.M.A.No.870 OF201323-09-2014 M/s. Tata Project Limited, Supply Chain Management, represented by its Managing Director..Appellant M/s. Offshore Infrastructure Limited,represented by its Managing Director.. Respondents Counsel for the appellant :Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for respondent No.1:Sri M.L. Ganu & Sri M. Papa Reddy, HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED:1. (2007) 8 SCC1102. (2008) 1 SCC5443. AIR1997SC24771) 4. (2006) 13 SCC5995. AIR2010CALCUTTA1126. 1998 III AD (DELHI) 641 7. AIR2006DELHI1698. (1997) 1 SCC5689. (1988) 1 SCC17410. (1984) 1 WLR392: (1984) 1 ALL ER351(CA) HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.870 OF2013JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice A. Shankar Narayana) Challenge, under this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, is to the order, dated 23-09-2013, in O.P. No.2236 of 2012 on the file of learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cour...
N.Aravind K Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by P.P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.236 of 2013 22-09-2014 N.Aravind Kumar.Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by P.P and another. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Sr.A.Dattanand Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Mr.S.R.Sanku. : : ?. Cases referred: 1. AIR2005SC2622= (2005).SCC5302. 2014(1) ALT (Crl.) 100 (SC) 3. (2003).SCC1754. (2006).SCC (Cri) 245 5. AIR1945PC186. (1974).SCC5227. (1977).SCC4518. (1980).SCC5549. (1992).SCC30510. 1992 Supp (1) SCC33511. (2001).SCC181THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.236 of 2013 ORDER: 1) The Revision Petition is filed by the Petitioner/2nd respondent/2nd accused under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C seeking to set aside the order dated 16.10.2012 in Crl.R.P.No.188 of 2012 on the file of I Additional metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad under which the revision filed by the Sultan Bazar Police through State was allow...
A. Narsimha Reddy Vs. Midde Chinna Niranjan and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.1102 of 2010 22-09-2014 A. Narsimha Reddy....Appellant Midde Chinna Niranjan and another.Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sr.A. Vishnu Vardhana Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.P.S.P.Suresh Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.K. Kishore Kumar Reddy : ?. Cases referred: 1) 2007 ACJ1735(AP) = 2007 (1) ALD3642) 1990 ACJ37(Madras) 3) 2006 ACJ789(Delhi) 4) 1990 ACJ201(Madras) 5) 1995 ACJ1106(Bombay) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1102 of 2010 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 12.12.2008 in O.P.No.2601 of 2006 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short the tribunal).the fiRs.respondent/owner of the tractor filed the instant MACMA. 2 a) On factual side, on 01.05.2006 when the claimant and some others who were the labourers under fiRs.respondent/owner while travelling in a tractor- cum-trailer bearing No.AP2 0827 and AP22 1148 to bring ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »