Andhra Pradesh Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.Kusuma Harinath Babu Vs. K.Prasuna and 3 Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2311 of 2014 14-08-2014 N.Kusuma Harinath Babu ReddyPetitioner K.Prasuna and 3 others Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Madhusudhana Reddy Counsel for the respondents: --- ?.Cases referred: The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.2311 of 2014 Dated 14.08.2014 The Court made the following: Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 03-06-2014, in OS.No.451 of 2006, on the file of the Court of the learned VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. The petitioner along with another person has filed the above-mentioned suit for declaration of title and possession and for perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. During the trial, the respondents/defendants wanted to introduce a deed, dated 15-04-2002. The petitioner objected to the admissibility of the said document on the ground that the same was neither registered...
M/S.Pranit Projects Pvt. Ltd., and Oth Vs. Goundra Yadaiah and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1576 OF200413-08-2014 M/s.Pranit Projects Pvt. Ltd., and others. Petitioners/defendants 22 to 24 Goundra Yadaiah and others. Respondents/ defendants 9 to 28 Counsel for the petitioners: Sri A.Laxminarayana, Counsel for Respondents : Sri C.Pratap Reddy : ?. Cases referred:01. 2003(6) SCC68202. ILR (1969) AP104203. 2004(2) ALD-152 (Noc) = (1) An.W.R.-105 04. 1998(5) ALD1=(4) ALT38405. 1989(3) ALT629(2) APLJ-477 06. AIR2001Delhi 338 HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1576 of 2014 ORDER: This revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners, who are defendants 22 to 24 among the 28 defendants in O.S. No.118 of 2013, against the order, dated 29.04.2014, in I.A. No.958 of 2013 in O.S. No.118 of 2013 on the file of I Additional District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy.2. The petitioners herein filed interlocutory application I.A.No.958 of 2013 in the pending suit, in su...
Sarikonda Pandu Raju (Died) Per L.R.Sari Vs. Government of India, Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.12690 of 2006 13-8-2014 Sarikonda Pandu Raju (died) per L.R.Sarikonda Hanumayamma W/o Sarikonda Pandu Raju...Petitioner Government of India, rep. by itsDirector, Ministry of Home Affairs,Freedom Fighters Division, Loknayak Bhavan, New Delhi & others. Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri SRINIVASA RAO BODDLURI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI B.NARAYANA REDDY : ?. Cases referred:1. 2012(2) ALD1912. 2014(3) ALD1293. 1993 Supp (3) SCC24. (2012) 11 SCC7545. (2001) 8 SCC8THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.12690 of 2006 ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, calls in question the action of the respondents in not restoring Swatantra Sainik Samman Pension Scheme of the petitioner herein as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently seeks a direction to the respondents to pay the same to the petitioner with effect from 3.2.1998.2. Pending the Writ Petition, the sole petitioner passed a...
National Insurance C. Ltd., Nizamaba Vs. Boini Gangaram and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-13-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A.NO.1020 of 2004 13-08-2014 National Insurance C. Ltd., Nizamabad ... APPELLANT/PETITIONER Boini Gangaram and another RESPONDENTS Counsel for Appellant: Sri E. Venugopal Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Sri P. Radhive Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. 2013 (6) ALD1252013 (6) ALD125THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR C.M.A.NO.1020 of 2004 and M.A.C.M.A.NO.3671 of 2005 and CROSS OBJECTIONS (SR) Nos.10079 and 11375 of 2006 COMMON JUDGMENT: CMA No.1020 of 2004 and MACMA No.3671 of 2005 are filed by the Insurance Company and the Cross Objections (SR) Nos.10079 of 2006 are filed by the claimant in C.M.A.No.1020 of 2004 and Cross Objections (SR) No.11375 of 2006 are filed by the legal heirs of one of the injured claimant in M.A.C.M.A.No.3671 of 2005. Since the issues involved in all the above matters are similar in nature, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. CMA No.1020 of 2004 arise out of the award passed in OP No.665 of 2000,...
Chelimilla Chinna Venkataswamy and O Vs. Billapuram Gopala Krishna and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2394 of 2014 12-08-2014 Chelimilla Chinna Venkataswamy and othersPetitioners Billapuram Gopala Krishna and othersRespondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Prakash Reddy, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents: Venkata Subba Rao, Advocate : : Cases Referred: 1.(2005) 4 SCC4802.2009 (3) SCJ517THE HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.R.P.No.2394 of 2014 ORDER:- This C.R.P.has been filed challenging the order dated 26.06.2014 passed in C.F.R.No.307 of 2014 in O.S.No.102 of 2013 by the Junior Civil Judge, Atmakur. The petitioners herein are the defendants in the suit. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioners received summons on 05.12.2013. On 31.12.2013, counsel for the petitioners filed vakalat and requested time to file written statement. The case was adjourned to 03.01.2014 and from that date to 03.02.2014 and lastly to 06.03.2014, i.e., the 90th day for filing the written statement. On the 90th day also, the def...
K.Vinodh Vs. Abdul Gani and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-12-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.3557 of 2005 12-08-2014 K.Vinodh Babu Appellant Abdul Gani and others Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Sr.T.C.Krishnan Counsel for Respondents 1 & 3: --- Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.Kota Subba Rao : : ?. Cases Referred: 1. 2011(6) ALD75(SC) 2. (2013) 8 SCC389THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.3557 of 2005 Judgment: Aggrieved by the award dated 09.09.2005 passed in MVOP No.235 of 1999 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Chittoor, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal granted compensation of Rs.50,000/- out of the claim of Rs.4,00,000/-, the claimant filed the present appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The brief facts of the case are as follows. That on 06.03.1999 at about 7.30 PM the claimant was proceeding on a cycle. At that time the offending lorry be...
S.K.Mis Vs. the Director General and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.913 of 2013 11-08-2014 S.K.Mishra .Appellant The Director General and others.Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sr.Satyam Reddy Counsel for respondents: Sr.N.V.Ramanujam HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.913 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.This appeal is filed by the unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.7385 of 2002. The appellant was working as a Lance Naik in D/113 Battalion, CRPF. In August 1997, he was posted to perform duties in the Shayampet Police Station of Warangal District. His duty was to give protection to the personnel of the police station. He was on duty between 20:00 hours and 22:00 hours on 17.08.1997. A charge sheet was issued to him on 26.09.1997 alleging that he fired two rounds from the weapon issued to him and caused the death of a Member of Force by name Lance Naik L.S.Prakash and that he was ...
Board of Intermediate Educati Vs. K.Prakash and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.1129 of 2014 11-08-2014 Board of Intermediate Education.Appellant K.Prakash and others.Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Smt. Akella Padma Counsel for respondent No.1: Sr.M.Panduranga Rao Counsel for respondents 2 and 3: G.P.for Higher Education Counsel for respondent No.4: Sr.D.Kodandarama Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.1129 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.Respondent No.4 is a Junior College, which is admitted to grant-in-aid. The Post of Junior Lecturer in Zoology reserved for S.C.candidates remained unfilled and was carried forward. After obtaining permission from the appellant, as required under the relevant provisions of law, an Advertisement was issued on 02.06.2004 inviting applications for the post. The 1st respondent and several others submitted applications. Interview, by the Selection Committ...
APSRTC, rep.by It's Regional Manager, Ku Vs. M.Srinivasa Re
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-08-2014
THE HONBLE SMT. JUSTICE ANIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPAL No.2956 of 2004 AND CROSS-OBJECTION0808-2014 APSRTC, rep.by it's Regional Manager, Kurnool.Appellant/Respondent in Cross objection M.Srinivasa Reddi. Respondent/Cross Objector Counsel for the Appellant :Sri K.V.Subba Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy : : ?. Cases referred:1. 2003 (3) L.S. 313 (D.B.) 2.(2009) 6 SCC1213.MANU/SC/1005/2013 4.2012 ACJ2328HONBLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPAL No.2956 of 2004 AND CROSS-OBJECTION C O M M O N - JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the appellant/respondent under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the Act), aggrieved by the award dated 17.12.2003, passed by the Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Kurnool, in M.V.O.P.No.951 of 2001, awarding compensation of Rs.7,50,000/-.2. The respondent/petitioner filed the above O.P under Section 166 of the Act, claiming compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- on acc...
Chappidi Satyanarayanamma and Another Vs. Chappidi Dhanalakshmi and 2 ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO C.R.P.NO.3443 OF201307-08-2014 Chappidi Satyanarayanamma and another....Appellants. Chappidi Dhanalakshmi and 2 others......RESPONDENTS For the Appellants: G. Simhadri. For the Respondents: Mr.T.V.S.Prabhakar Rao : ?.CITATIONS: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO ORDER: This Revision is preferred against the Order passed on 05-07-2013 in I.A.No.216 of 2013 in O.S.No.28 of 2011. The petitioners in this Revision are the defendants, while Respondents 1 to 3 are the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs instituted the Suit seeking declaration of their title over the plaint schedule property. It appears that after the evidence was closed on both sides, arguments were heard on both sides and it is asserted that the learned counsel for the plaintiffs has taken time to submit his reply arguments and at that stage I.A.No.216 of 2013 has been filed seeking amendment of the plaint schedule property with regard to the Revenue Survey Number and also three out ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »