Andhra Pradesh Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Chief General Manager and Anoth Vs. V.Rama R
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.1200 of 2014 25-08-2014 The Chief General Manager and another....Appellants V.Rama Rao.Respondent Counsel for the appellants: Ms.Uma Devi Counsel for respondent: Sr.Kouturi Pavan Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY W.A.No.1200 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.This writ appeal is filed against the order, dated 01.04.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in Review W.P.M.P.No.40318 of 2013 in W.P.No.26924 of 1999. The facts, that gave raise to the filing of the writ appeal, are as under: The sole respondent was employed as Clerk in the appellants- Bank on 23.04.1970 and his services were confirmed in that post on 23.10.1972. In the year 1976, he became Officer of the Bank. He was paced under suspension on 13.02.1987 on certain allegations. Proceedings under the relevant provisions of I.P.C.were initiated against him by th...
Asian Securities and Estates Lim Vs. Ms. Nausheen Riyaz and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND THE HONBLE SMT JUSTICE ANIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2038 OF201422-08-2014 Asian Securities and Estates Limited.Petitioner Ms. Nausheen Riyaz & others .Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Mr. Mahfooz Nazki Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. V.Ravinder Rao : : ?. Cases referred:1. AIR1997Cal 397 2. 2011 (3) CHN6803. AIR2000P&H534. ILR2005(3) Kerala 268 5. ILR2006(2) Kerala 251 6. 2009 (2) CTC2347.MANU/DE/1383/2014 8. 2012 (1) ARBLR279(Gujarat) 9. (2010) 1 Supreme Court Cases 72 10. AIR2008Supreme Court 1016 11. (2004) 8 Supreme Court Cases 579 12. (2012) 10 Supreme Court Cases 1 13. (2011) 5 Supreme Court Cases 532 14. (2014) 6 Supreme Court Cases 677 15. AIR1962Supreme Court 406 16. (2006) 7 Supreme Court Cases 275 17. 2013 (6) ALT457(D.B.) AIR1997Cal 397 2011 (3) CHN680AIR2000P&H53ILR2005(3) Kerala 268 ILR2006(2) Kerala 251 2009 (2) CTC234MANU/DE/1383/2014 2012 (1) ARBLR279(Gujarat) (2010) 1 Supreme Court Cases 72 AIR2008Supreme Cour...
Edara Sambasiva Prasad and 4 Oth Vs. the State Through Sho Mangalagiri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY CRL.P.No.8993 OF201122-08-2014 Edara Sambasiva Prasad & 4 Others...PETITIONERS The State Through SHO Mangalagiri Rural P S Guntur District, Rep. by its Public ProsecutorHigh Court of Judicature at Hyderabad And another...RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioners : Ch. Masthan Naidu Counsel for Respondent No.1: Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri M. Chalapathi Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1995 Supp (3) SCC4382 2002 (1) ALT (Crl.) 470 (A.P) 3 (2002) 5 SCC3714 (20029) 1 SCC5545 2010 AIR SCW51016 AIR2011SC12387 (2010) 1 SCC7078 (2004) 13 SCC1299 (1994) 1 SCC7310 (2007) 10 SCC79711 (2010) 10 SCC33712 (2009) 16 SCC60513 (2001) 9 SCC61814 AIR2000SC75415 (2010) 10 SCC67316 2011 (3) ALT (Crl.) 109 (SC) 17 2014 (1) ALT (Crl.) 479 (SC) 18 2013 (3) SCC33019 AIR1991SC126020 AIR1987SC87721 (1977) 4 SCC55122 (2011) 12 SCC437THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8993 of 2011 ORDER:1. This petition is filed und...
Matta Sriramamurthy Vs. Arepalli Srirama Murth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1137 of 2014 22-08-2014 Matta Sriramamurthy....Petitioner Arepalli Srirama Murthy.....Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.J.Sreenivasa Rao Counsel for respondent : Sr.Siva Sankara Rao Borra : ?.Cases referred: 2013(6) ALD314THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE R. KANTHARAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1137 of 2014 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.85 of 2007 against the order dated 12.03.2014 passed in I.A.No.478 of 2012 in O.S.No.85 of 2007 by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Tanuku. I have heard Sr.J.Sreenivasa Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/plaintiff and Sr.Siva Sankara Rao, Borra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/ defendant. The brief facts, necessary for considering this Civil Revision Petition, are that the plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.05.2006. The defendant filed written statem...
Kannepogu Ram Vs. the State of A.P. Through Sho, Khanapura
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1146 of 2014 21-08-2014 Kannepogu Ramulu .Petitioner The State of A.P.through SHO, Khanapuramhaveli P.S..Respondents Counsel for the Appellant : Sr.Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?. Cases referred: 1. 1996(1) ALT9532. 1995(3) ALD803. 2003(1)ALD (Crl.) 433=2003(2) ALT4444. 2007 Cri.LJ3465. 1997(2) ALD (Crl.) 473 6. 1978(1) APLJ3917. 1980(1) ALT8(DB) 8. (1985).SCC5739. (2004).SCC12910. 199593) ALD1090(DB) 11. AIR1970SC82912. (2004).SCC12913. 1978(1) APLJ-391(DB) 14. 1980(1) ALT8HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1146 of 2014 ORDER : 1) This revision is filed by the petitioner/Accused No.1 owner of the vehicle under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C.aggrieved by the order dated 14.05.2014 in Crl.M.P.No.1235 of 2014 in Crime No.275/2014 of Khanapuram Haveli Police Station, Khammam District registered for the offence punishable under Section 34(a) of A.P.E...
The Bagh Amberpet Welfare Society (Regd. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-21-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.11681 of 2000 and batch 21-8-2014 The Bagh Amberpet Welfare Society (Regd.No.599/81), Bathkammakunta, Shivam Road, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad and others...Petitioners State of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others. ..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondents 12 to 14 : Sri P.SRI RAM Counsel for Respondents 16 to 19 : G.P. for Land Acquisition : ?. Cases referred:1. (2006) 7 SCC4162. (2005) 6 SCC1493. AIR1994SC8534. (2002) 4 SCC3885. (2000) 1 SCC533THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI Review W.P.M.P (SR) No.166975 of 2013 in W.P.No.11681 of 2000 & W.P.No.22184 of 2009 Common Order: Since the subject matter in Review in W.P.No.11681 of 2000 and W.P.No.22184 of 2009 is the same and the issues are inter-related, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of these two cases by way of this common order.2. The facts and circumstances, leadin...
G.Venkateswar R Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.10956 of 2002 20-08-2014 G.Venkateswar Rao.Petitioner The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax .Respondent Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Y.Ratnakar Counsel for respondents: Sr.J.V.Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: 1. (2007) 289 ITR03412. (2005) 248 ITR198THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.10956 of 2002 ORDER: (Per LNR,J.The petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).In the returns submitted for the assessment year 1999-2000, he has shown the cost of the building constructed by him at Rs.30,45,318/-. A search was conducted on 05.09.2000 in the house of the father of the petitioner. Based upon the discoveries said to have been made during the search, the respondent opined that the cost of the construction of the house of the petitioner is much more than what was disclosed. The matter was forwarded to th...
Lachugari Vittal and Others Vs. Shaik Mahmood and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.431 of 2010 20-08-2014 Lachugari Vittal and others..Appellants Shaik Mahmood and another.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.C. Pratap Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.V. Ajay Kumar : ?. Cases referred: 1) 2002 ACJ828= 2001(1) ALT4852) (2009) 13 SCC6543) 2012 (2) An.W.R.291 (SC) 4) 2013 ACJ1633(AP) 5) 2013 ACJ1403(SC) 6) 2009 ACJ1298= AIR2009SC31047) 2014 (1) ALT512(DB) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.431 of 2010 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal in O.P.No.687 of 2003 for the death of deceasedL. Santosh Kumar, the claimants who are his father, mother and sister filed the instant MACMA. 2) Factual side, on 28.03.2003 at about 3:45 pm, when the deceased Santosh Kumar and his friend Narsimha Reddy were proceeding on Hero Honda motorcycle bearing No.AP9A1055from Gummadidala village to Narsapur and when they reached near turning of Kondapur village shivar, one lorr...
The Commissioner of Income Ta Vs. M/S.Transport Corporation of Ind
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-20-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.109 of 2002 20-08-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax...APPELLANT M/s.Transport Corporation of India....RESPONDENT : COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Sr.J.V.Prasad COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :-Sr.Y.Ratnakar ?. Cases Referred: 1.256 ITR7012.188 ITR6(Bombay) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM ITTA No.109 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order, dated 31.10.2000, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A (for short the Tribunal) in I.T.A.No.1327/Hyd/92. Briefly stated the facts are that the respondent, which mainly carries on the activity of the transport, filed its return for the assessment year 1988-89. Apart from other iteMs.the respondent claimed deduction of a sum of Rs.1,19,30,493/- under Section 37 (1) of the Income Tax Act (for short the Act) t...
Dr.Pradyut Waghray Vs. Margadarshi Chit Fund Ltd,warangal Branc
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.644 of 2014 14-08-2014 Dr.Pradyut Waghray....Petitioner Margadarshi Chit Fund Ltd,Warangal Branch and five others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.K.K.Waghray Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.P.Durga Prasad : ?.Cases Referred: NIL HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.644 of 2014 Date:14.08.2014 The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal arises out of order, dated 28.04.2014, in I.A.No.239 of 2013 in O.S.No.100 of 2009 on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Warangal. The petitioner is defendant No.2 in the above-mentioned suit filed by respondent No.1 for recovery of money. Respondent No.2 is the principal borrower and the appellant along with respondent Nos.3 to 6 is the guarantor. Except the appellant, all other respondents, including the principal borrower, have remained ex parte. The appellant has filed a counter-affidavit an...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »