Andhra Pradesh Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wali Mohammed and Anoth Vs. Neelam Bajaj and an
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2354 OF2012and batch 11-07-2014 Wali Mohammed and another..PETITIONERS Neelam Bajaj and anotherRESPONDENTS Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.H. Venugopal (C.R.P No.2354 of 2012) Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.T. Sudhakar Reddy and Sr.S. Mahajir Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.T. Sudhakar Reddy (C.R.P No.2593 of 2012) Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.H. Venugopal and Sr.S. Mahajir HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2354 AND2593OF2012Dated:11-07-2014 Common Order: Both the revisions arise out of an order dated 14-03-2012 passed by the Court of XII Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court).City Civil Court, Hyderabad in E.P No.2 of 2008 in O.S No.59 of 2000. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in C.R.P No.2593 of 2012. The petitioner-Suresh Kapoor is the owner of the schedule property....
Kancha Beer Vs. the Area Age Determination Committee, Re
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITON No.19139 of 2013 11-07-2014 Kancha Beeraiah.Petitioner The Area Age Determination Committee, rep.by its General Manager (personal) Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam-II and 2 others..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.M.GOVINDA REDDY Counsel for the respondents: Sr.NANDIGAM KRISHNARAO : : ?. Cases Referred: 1. (2000) 8 SCC696THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19139 of 2013 The Court made the following: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.19139 of 2013 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not referring the petitioner to the 2nd respondent Apex Medical Board for determination of his date of birth as per Rule-3 Circular No.P.49/2702/IR/1270, dated 01.08.1988 and as...
M/S.Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Hydera Vs. Commissioner of Income T
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.78 of 2000 11-07-2014 M/s.Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Hyderabad..Applicant Commissioner of Income Tax.Respondent !Counsel for the applicant: Sr.S.Ravi Counsel for respondent: Sr.S.R.Ashok HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: 1 (2003) 260 ITR371(Bom) 2 (2007) 295 ITR228(SC) 3 (2012) 343 ITR89(SC) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.78 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR, J.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench referred the following questions to this Court, through its order, dated 24.01.2000: 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in law in its interpretation on the computation of relief under the provisions of S.80HHC?. 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in law in holding that for the purposes of computation of deduction under S.80HHC, 90% of the rec...
Sivangala Thandi Deepak and 3 Others. Vs. the State of A.P., Rep.by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.6875 of 2013 11-07-2014 Sivangala Thandi Deepak and 3 others. ... Petitioners/A.1 to A.4 The State of A.P., rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad, through the S.H.O. Tenali Rural P.S. and another.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners:Sri S.R. Sanku Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: : ?. Cases referred:1. (2005) 3 SCC5072. (2007) 1 SCC2623. (2004) 8 SCC1004. 2008 (2) ALT (Crl.) 327 (AP) 5. (2012) 10 SCC741HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.6875 of 2013 ORDER: The petitioners are A.1 to A.4 in C.C.No.4 of 2013 on the file of the II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali. They seek for the quashment of C.C.No.4 of 2013 on the ground that Tenali Police and Tenali Courts do not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain the controversy between the petitioners on the one side and the second respondent on the other side.2. A case was institut...
The Registrar, General Manager, Personne Vs. Boddu Rat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APEPAL No.218 OF201410-07-2014 The Registrar, General Manager, Personnel Department, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Oriental House, A-25/28, Asafali Road, Head Office, New Delhi 110002 and three others..APPELLANTS Boddu RattaiahRESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants:Sr.Vedula Srinivas Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.Siva HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.218 OF201410-07-2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This writ appeal arises out of the order dated 19-11-2013 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No.2653 of 2004. The respondents in the writ petition are the appellants. The respondent herein i.e., the writ petitioner joined the service of Oriental Insurance Company Limited as Development Officer on 01-05-1987, on being selected. His services were confirmed in 1988. Ther...
1.Bommadevu Subbalakshmi, W/O Manikyalu, Vs. 1.Gundubilli Subbarao, S/ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5196 of 2012 10-07-2014 1.Bommadevu Subbalakshmi, W/o Manikyalu, R/o Vannepudi, Gollaprolu Mandal, E.G.Dist. 2. Bommadevu Kameswararao, S/o Manikyalu, R/o Vannepudi, Gollaprolu Mandal E.G.Dist. At present residing at Srikakulam. 1.Gundubilli Subbarao, S/o Ganga Raju, kOTTANANDURU vILLAGE & Mandal, E.G.Dist. 2.Bommadevu Manikyalu /(DIED).3. hUNDUBILLI sUBBALAKSHMI w/O Subbarao, Kotananduru Village & Mandal, E.G.Dist. Counsel for the Petitioners:Sr.T.Durga Prasad Rao Counsel ofor the respondents:None appeared/ : ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5196 of 2012 ORDER: This civil revision petition is preferred by the petitioners in I.A.No.187 of 2011 in O.S.No.222 of 2006. I.A.No.187 of 2011 was preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay of 1653 days in filing Interlocutory Application for setting aside the exparte decree. I.A.N...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd,rep. by Vs. Chinthala Laxmi and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.830 of 2009 09-07-2014 The New India Assurance Co.Ltd,Rep. by its Branch Manager...Appellant Chinthala Laxmi and others.Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.B. Naresh Counsel for Respondents 1 to 7: Sr.Venkateswar Varnasi Counsel for Respondent No.10 : Mrs.D.Radhika : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2001 (1) ALT4852) 2013 (1) ALT727(FB) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.830 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the award dated 21.12.2005 in O.P.No.632 of 2004 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-IV District Judge (FTC).Karimnagar (for short the Tribunal).the New India Assurance Company Limited preferred the instant appeal. The appellant herein is the 3rd respondent before the Tribunal; respondents 1 to 7 in the appeal are claimants; respondent Nos.8 and 9 herein are the fiRs.and second respondents and respondent No.10/ APSRTC (hirer of the bus) is the 4th respondent before the Tribunal. 2) Facts in nutshell are thus: a) Claimants 1 t...
East India Petroleum Lim Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Petition No.5358 of 1999 09-07-2014 East India Petroleum Limited.appellant. The Commissioner of Income Tax and another...Respondents Counsel for appellant: Sr.K.Raji Reddy Counsel for Respondents : Sr.J.V.Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Petition No.5358 of 1999 ORDER: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The petitioner is a Limited Company and is assessed to income tax. In the assessment year 1997-98, the Assessing Authority passed an order, dated 18.03.1998, taking the view that the sum covered by prima facie adjustment of Rs.79,86,590/-, under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).was not proper, and accordingly, made a demand of Rs.47,10,108/-, as tax. Additional tax of Rs.6,86,847/-, under Section 143(1)(a) of the Act and interest of Rs.7,78,680/-, under Section 234...
V.Suryanara Vs. the State, Rep. by the Inspector of Poli
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.5027 of 2014 09-7-2014 V.Suryanarayana Petitioner/Accused The State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, CBI, ACB, Hyderabad, Through the Spl. PP., High Court of A.P., Hyderabad Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Ch.Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel Counsel for Respondent:Sri P.Kesava Rao, Spl. Standing Counsel : ?. Cases referred:1. (2011) 12 SCC4372.2014 (1) ALD (Crl.) 304 (SC) 3.2000 (4) ALD6634. AIR1998SC29855. 2000 (1) SCR4176. AIR1999SC2405HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.5027 of 2014 Date:09. 7-2014 Order: The sole petitioner is the sole accused in C.C.No.19 of 2013. He seeks for quashment of C.C.No.19 of 2013 on the file of the Principal Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad against him for the offences under Section 409 IPC and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (the P.C.Act, for short).2. Before going into the question whether C.C.No.19 of 2013 deser...
M/S.Arjundas Rajkumar and Ot Vs. .Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyde
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.112 of 2001 09-07-2014 M/s.Arjundas Rajkumar and others.applicant .Commissioner of Income-tax, HyderabadRespondent. !Counsel for applicant: Sr.Y.Ratnakar Counsel for Respondent : Sr.S.R.Ashok HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 1. 189 ITR2852. 236 ITR4123. 250 ITR871THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.112 of 2001 ORDER: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This reference under Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act) is made by the Hyderabad Bench B of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal).to this Court, with a request to express its opinion on the following questions: 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on cumulative consideration of all relevant factors and in existence it could be said that the parties never intended to carry on any business and whether the nature ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »