Andhra Pradesh Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.R.K.Raju, S/O a.S.Raju vs. a.V.S.Raju, S/O a.S.Raj
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5065 of 2013 and batch 17-07-2014 A.R.K.Raju, S/o A.S.Raju....Petitioner A.V.S.Raju, S/o A.S.Raju.....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.N.Sreedhar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.Kasireddy Jagathpal Reddy : ?.Cases Referred: (2009) 4 SCC410HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5065 and 5067 of 2013 Date:17.07.2014 The Court made the following: Common Order: These two Civil Revision Petitions arise out of separate, but identical ordeRs.dated 07.11.2013, passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar in I.A.Nos.3496 and 3498 of 2013 in O.S.No.242 of 2005. I have heard Sr.N.Sreedhar Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sr.Kasireddy Jagathpal Reddy, the learned counsel for the respondent. The respondent filed O.S.No.242 of 2005 for partition of the suit schedule properties. The petitioner also filed another suit, for c...
The Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-i, Vs. M/S.Jaihind Cycle Company, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.58 OF200116-07-2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P.-I, Hyderabad.....Petitioner. M/s.Jaihind Cycle Company, Siddiambar Bazar, Hyderabad.....Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.S.R.Ashok Counsel for respondent : Sr.S. Ravi. : ?.Cases referred: Nil HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A No.58 OF2001JUDGMENT:- (per Honble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The respondent is a company undertaking various business activities. It has been filing returns year after year and was also paying the tax. The business premises of the respondent and the places of other connected persons and agencies were searched on 13.11.1996. Certain undisclosed income and other items were found. Based on the same, the assessing authority made a block assessment for a period of five years covering 1993-94 to 1997-98. Various items which were said to have been suppressed were ...
A.P.S.R. Vs. the Commissioner of Income T
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.141 of 2000 16-07-2014 A.P.S.R.T.C..Applicant The Commissioner of Income Tax.Respondent !Counsel for the applicant : Sr.A.V.Krishna Kowndinya Counsel for respondents: Sr.S.R.Ashok HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: 1. (1986) 159 ITR0001(SC) 2. (1999) 237 ITR07773. (2002) 254 ITR0708THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.141 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The applicant (for short the corporation) is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).For the assessment years 1987-88 and 1988-89, it filed returns covering various aspects. One of the benefits claimed by the Corporation is referable to Section 11 of the Act. It provides for total exemption of the income earned by an assessee from the property held for charitable or religious purposes. Some dispute arose as to whether the activities of the Corporation are charitable in nature a...
S.thenmai and Oth Vs. the Apsrtc Represented by Its Managing D
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.930 of 2006 15-07-2014 S.Thenmai and others .Appellants The APSRTC represented by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, A.P.Respondent Counsel for the Appellants: Sr.T.C.Krishnan Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.K.V.Subba Reddy : : ?. Cases referred: 1. 2013 (9) SCC54HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.930 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This appeal by the claimants challenging the award dated 02.12.2005 passed in M.V.O.P.No.465 of 1999 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Chittoor (for short the Tribunal).The parties hereinafter referred to as arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The claimants specific case is that the deceased was aged about 32 yeaRs.doing business met with an accident on 16.06.1999 at about 04.30 PM while proceeding on his motorcycle bearing No.TN-03-W-8109 from Vaniambadi to Ramakuppam along with two otheRs.It is all...
Vijaya Bank, Colaba Branch, Mum Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.4044 of 2000 15-07-2014 Vijaya Bank, Colaba Branch, Mumbai .Petitioner Joint Commissioner of Income Tax and others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.E.Ajay Reddy Counsel for respondents : Sr.S.Ravi Sr.J.V.Prasad Sr.Anil Kumar Sr.Unnam Muralidhar Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.No.4044 of 2000 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The petitioner is a nationalised bank. It approached this Court feeling aggrieved by the demand notice, dated 16.09.1999 issued by the 1st respondent to the 2nd respondent requiring it to deposit certain amount. The relevant facts are as under: The 3rd respondent is a company, which was undertaking certain manufacturing activity. It approached the petitioner in the year 1994 with a request to sanction loan for purchase of plant and machinery. After verification of the documents, the petiti...
The State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Pro Vs. Kollam Gangi Red
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5795 of 2014 14-07-2014 The State of A.P. rep. by the Public Prosecutor.Petitioner Kollam Gangi Reddy . Respondent/Accused Counsel for the Petitioner : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Ram Murthy Reddy : : ?. Cases referred:1. (2005)2 SCC422. AIR2005SC34903. 1955(1) SCR10834. (2000)3 SCC4095. 2000(1) ALD (Crl) 603 6. 1999 Cri.L.J40637. (1995)1 SCC3498. (2007)10 SCC368THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5795 of 2014 ORDER: This Criminal petition is filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C by the State against the accused No.33 (in crime No.36 of 2014 of Dhone Town Police Station) seeking to cancel the bail granted to him in Crl.P.No.5492 of 2014 by this Court on 15.05.2014. The crime registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 120-B IPC, Section 20(1)(3), 10, 29, (1)(2)(b) of Indian Forest Act and Rule3 of Red Sandal Wood Possession and Transit Rules and Sections 27, 29, 3...
Mangali Parvathamma and Others Vs. P. Yadaiah and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.1141 of 2010 14-07-2014 Mangali Parvathamma and others..Appellants P. Yadaiah and another.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.P. Ramakrishna Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.V. Sambasiva Rao : ?. Cases referred: 1)2013 ACJ1441(SC) 2)2008 ACJ614(SC) 3)2012 ACJ1428(SC) 4)2013 ACJ1403(SC) 5)2004 ACJ448(SC) 6)2009 ACJ1298(SC) HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1141 of 2010 JUDGMENT: The bone of contention in this MACMA filed by the claimants against the Award dated 16.09.2009 in O.P.No.1784 of 2007 passed by the Chairman, MACT-cum-II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short the Tribunal).is the adequacy of compensation of Rs.6,78,168/- awarded by the Tribunal as against the claim of Rs.12,00,000/- for the death of one M. Shankaraiah, Maali in the department of Horticulture, University of Hyderabad, in a lorry accident on 30.05.2007. The claim was made against respondents 1 and 2 who are th...
Rasala Andalu and Others Vs. the Managing Director,apsrtc, Musheeraba
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.2109 of 2009 14-07-2014 Rasala Andalu and others..Appellants The Managing Director,APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyd. and another.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.T. Viswarupa Chary Counsel for Respondents: Sr.K. Madhava Reddy : ?. Cases referred: 1)2011(6) ALD75(SC) 2)2013 ACJ1403(SC) 3)2006 (1) ACC474(DB) 4)AIR1998SC31915)AIR2002SC2607HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2109 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 03.01.2005 in O.P.No.2015 of 2001 passed by the Chairman, MACT-cum-Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Communal Offence Cases, Red Hills, Hyderabad (for short the Tribunal).the claimants preferred the instant MACMA. 2) The facts in nutshell are thus: a) The 1st claimant is wife, 2nd claimant is son, 3rd claimant is daughter and 4th claimant is mother of deceasedRasala Nagabhushanam. Their case is that on 15.07.1995 when the deceased along with his friendK.Gangi Reddy was going on his ...
Smt.K.Kavi Vs. Shiva Shank
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA F.C.A. Nos.176 OF2008AND BATCH1407-2014 Smt.K.Kavith... Appellant Shiva Shankar.. Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar Counsel for the respondent:Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu Sri K. Chaitanya HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED:1. 1977 AIR22182. AIR1977Punjab and Haryana 167 HONBLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA F.C.A. Nos.176 OF2008AND60OF2010COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice A. Shankar Narayana) F.C.A. No.176 of 2008 is preferred, under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, by the respondent - wife in O.P. No.540 of 2005, aggrieved of the order therein, dated 14-09-2006, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, granting decree for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.2. F.C.A. No.60 of 2010 is preferred, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, by the unsuccessful petitioner - husband in ...
S.Muralikrishnan @ M Vs. R.S.Siva Kumar and an
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-14-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.3249 of 2005 14-07-2014 S.Muralikrishnan @ MuraliAppellant R.S.Siva Kumar and anotherRespondents Counsel for the Petitioner:T.C.Krishnan Counsel for the Respondents: -- NA -- : : ?.Cases Referred: (2013) 9 SCC54THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.3249 of 2005 JUDGMENT:- Though notices were served on the respondents, there is no representation on their behalf. Dissatisfied with the award of compensation of Rs.60,000/- for a total claim of Rs.2,00,000/- by order dated 05.08.2004 passed in M.V.O.P.No.138 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Chittoor (the Tribunal, for brevity).the claimant preferred this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation. The appellant herein is the claimant and the respondents herein are the respondents before the Tribunal and for the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as per their array before the Tribunal. The brief facts of the cas...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »