Andhra Pradesh Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamatham Venkatesw Vs. N.Venkateswara
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-24-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.1212 of 2014 24-07-2014 Kamatham Venkateswarlu Petitioner N.Venkateswara Rao Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Sr.P. Narasimhulu Counsel for the Respondent:--- : : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR Civil Revision Petition No.1212 of 2014 Order: This revision is directed against the order, dated 13.03.2014, passed in I.A.No.163 of 2013 in CFR No.1382 of 2013, by the Senior Civil judge, Nandikotkuru, whereby and whereunder the lower Court dismissed the petition filed to condone the delay in paying the Court fees. The petitioner herein filed the suit on 04.09.2013 with deficit court fees. He filed a petition seeking permission to grant 30 days time to pay deficit court fee. The lower Court granted time till 03.10.2013 to pay the deficit court fee. Admittedly, there was Samaikyandra movement and the Court staff participated in the said movement from 19.08.2013 to 20.10.2013. The plaint was returned ...
Bondi Janaki and Oth Vs. 1.State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public Pros
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.3712 OF201123-07-2014 Bondi Janaki and Others...PETITIONERS1State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor 2.Bondi Korlayya...RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioners : Sr.B.M.Patro Counsel for Respondent No.1: Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sr.Kuriti Bhaskara Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred (2010) 12 SCC2542 (2001) 6 SCC1813 (2013) 5 SCC1484 (2013) 2 SCC4355 (2010) 8 SCC7756 (2013) 7 SCC457 (2012) 1 SCC1308 (2010) 8 SCC7759 (1982) 1 SCC46610 AIR1992SC60411 (2000) 2 SCC63612 (2008) 12 SCC53113 AIR1960SC86614 AIR1982SC604THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE T. SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.3712 OF2011ORDER: This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.to quash the proceedings in Cr.No.38 of 2011 of Gara Police Station, Srikakulam District. The factual matrix, leading to the filing of the present petition, are as follows: FiRs.petitioner is the wife, 2nd respondent is the father and the de-facto complainant in Cr...
Smt.Botla Nagam Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd.,rep.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy A.S.No.20 of 2005 23-07-2014 Smt.Botla Nagamani...Petitioner United India Insurance Company Ltd.,Rep. by its Divisional Manager,Kakinada, East Godavari District. Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.A.K.Kishore Reddy Counsel for the respondent: Mrs.SAV.Ratnam ?. Cases referred: (2009) 7 Supreme Court Cases 372 The Honble Sr.Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy AS.No.20 of 2005 Dated 23.07.2014 The Court made the following: Order: This Appeal arises out of Judgment and Decree, dated 15-04-2004, in OS.No.34 of 2000, on the file of the Court of the learned IV Additional District Judge, Kakinada. The limited aspect raised in this Appeal pertains to non- award of pendentelite interest on the decretal amount. The husband of the appellant obtained an insurance policy covering the risk of accident. On his death, the appellant made a claim for payment of insurance amount. The claim was repudiated by the respondent- Insurance Company on the ground that the d...
Shri Chakiri Ashok Kumar, Ongo Vs. the Income Tax Offic
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.47 of 2002 23-07-2014 Shri Chakiri Ashok Kumar, Ongole.Appellant The Income Tax Officer.Respondents Counsel for the appellant:Sr.A.V.Krishna Kaundinya Counsel for respondent : Sr.J.V.Prasad HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.47 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The appellant is an assessee. His land, admeasuring Ac.1.62 cents was acquired by the Government of A.P.in the year 1976, by invoking the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act (for short the Act).The Land Acquisition Officer fixed the market value at Rs.6.50 ps. per square yard. Not satisfied with that, the appellant sought for reference under Section 18 of the Act. The same was taken up by the subordinate Judge, Ongole and through its order, dated 31.07.1986, the trial Court enhanced the market value to Rs.20/- per square yard. The statutory benefi...
Smt.Kamalabai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.21 of 2002 22-07-2014 Smt.Kamalabai Loya.Appellant. Commissioner of Income-Tax and another.Respondents Counsel for appellant: Mrs.C.Jayashree Sarathy Counsel for Respondents : Sr.S.R.Ashok HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM I.T.T.A.No.21 of 2002 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The appellant is an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act).The returns, filed by her for the assessment year 1993-94, were processed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-II, Hyderabad, and an order was passed on 30.12.1994. However, he proposed to rectify the said order, by incorporating some more iteMs.Therefore, he issued a show cause notice, dated 26.02.1996, to the appellant to explain as to why Income from House Property, being Rs.17,600/-, be not added. Stating that in spite o...
K. R. Chandra Paul Vs. the State of A.P Rep. by Inspector of Po
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Criminal Appeal No.1665 of 2005 21-07-2014 K.R.Chandra Paul....Appellant The State of A.P Rep. by Inspector of Police, CBI Visakhapatnam.Respondent Counsel for Appellant : Sr.T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Sr.P. Kesava Rao, Special Standing Counsel for CBI : ?. Cases referred: 1) AIR1957SC614(1) 2) (2006) 7 SCC172= 2006(2) ALD (Crl.) 564 (SC) 3) (1998) 5 Supreme Court Cases 529 4) (1999) 8 Supreme Court Cases 501 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1665 of 2005 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the Accused Officer(AO) aggrieved by the judgment dated 25.10.2005 in C.C.No.11 of 2002 passed by learned Special Judge for CBI cases, Visakhapatnam, convicting him for the offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short P.C Act) and sentencing him to suffer RI for one year and pay fine of Rs.500/- and in default to suffer SI for one month on two counts...
C.Prab Vs. A.N.Raghava Venkatramana and an
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1261 of 2006 21-07-2014 C.PrabhakarPetitioner A.N.Raghava Venkatramana and anotherRespondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Krishnan, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents:Venkat Rao, Advocate : : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1261 of 2006 JUDGMENT:- Dissatisfied with the award of compensation of Rs.1,26,200/- out of the total claim of Rs.3,00,000/- by order dated 24.01.2006 passed in M.V.O.P.No.37 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum VIII Additional District Judge (FTC).Chittoor (the Tribunal, for brevity).the claimant preferred this appeal. The appellant herein is the claimant and the respondents herein are the respondents before the Tribunal and for the sake of convenience, the parties will be hereinafter referred to as per their array before the Tribunal. The brief facts of the case are as follows:- On 25.04.1999 at about 09:00 PM, the claimant (as a pillion rider) and another pe...
Burra Narsaiah and AnoThe Vs. Mova Venkateswar Rao and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.748 of 2009 18-07-2014 Burra Narsaiah and another...Appellants Mova Venkateswar Rao and others.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.Vemuganti Ram Chander Rao Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Sr.P. Bhanu Prakash : ?. Cases referred: 1) 2001 (1) ALT4852) 1987 ACJ561(SC) 3) AIR2007Supreme Court 1474 4) 2013 ACJ597(Karnataka) 5) 2003 ACJ1914(J & K) 6) 2013 ACJ99(AP) 7) AIR2012Supreme Court 2185 8) 2009 ACJ1298(SC) 9) 2013 ACJ1403(SC) HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.748 of 2009 JUDGMENT: The point for determination in this MACMA filed by the claimants against the Award dated 23.10.2006 in O.P.No.881 of 2005 passed by the Chairman, MACT-cum-District Judge, Karimnagar (for short the Tribunal) is whether the claimants being brothers of the deceased Burra Venkataiah can claim compensation for loss of earnings of the deceased as his legal representatives. 2) The facts in short shrift are thus: a) The claimants and d...
M/S. Kanchan India Limited Rep., by Its Vs. State of A.P. Commissioner ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NOs.3284 OF2014and batch 18-07-2014 M/S.Kanchan India Limited rep., by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Rajnikanth Lalji Tanna .Petitioner State of A.P.Commissionerate of Women Development & Child Welfare Department rep., by its Commissioner and two otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.Vedula Srinivas Counsel for respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Women Development & Child Welfare; Sr.E. Manohar, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sr.Deepak Bhattacharjee, Learned Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3. HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (1990) 3 SCC2802) 1979 (3) SCC4893) Judgment of the Supreme Court n C.A.No.5898 of 2012 dated 17.08.2012 4) (2007) 6 SCC815) (2012) 4 SCC4076) (1991) 1 SCC2127) (2009).SCC171 (2009).SCC (Civ) 803 8) (2000) 1 SCR5059) (2014) 3 SCC76010) AIR2005SC46911) AIR1996SC1112) AIR1999SC39313) (2007) 14 SCC51714) (2006) 10 SCC23615) 1990 4 JT60116) 1985 8 SCR90917) AIR1996SC5118) 2005 7 JT21419) 1991...
Sri Vithanala Yagnesh, S/O. Vithanala Ve Vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NOs. 169 OF2014and batch 18-7-2014 Sri Vithanala Yagnesh, S/o. Vithanala Venkata Rao,Aged about 41 years, Occu: Private Employee,R/o.H.No.50-27-9, TPT Colony, opp: Current Office,Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh..petitioner Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Rep.by its Managing Director, Bharat Bhavan,4 & 6 Currimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra and other . Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V Harish Kumar Counsel for the respondents : -- Sri B.Mayur Reddy : : ?. Cases referred:1992. SUPP (3) SCC217(2000) 1 SCC168(2008) 6 SCC1AIR1963SC649(2009 ) 5 SCC1(1966) 11 SCC742(2010) 4 SCC50(2011 ) 1 SCC640(2011) 5 SCC435(2011) 1 SCC640This Court made the following: HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NOs. 169 AND2586OF2014Common Order: In these two writ petitions, petitioners challenge various clauses in the combined notification issued by Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL), Hindustan Pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »