Andhra Pradesh Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Chandrasekhar and 2 Other Vs. K. Bhavana @ V. Bhavana, W/O. V. Chand ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.Nos.261 of 2014 and batch 03-06-2014 V.Chandrasekhar and 2 others.... Petitioners/(R.2 to R.4 in CrlRC.374/14) K. Bhavana @ V. Bhavana, W/o. V. Chandrasekhar, and another.... Respondents/(Petitioner & R.1 in CrlRC.374/14) Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for Respondent No.1:Sri B.Adinarayana Rao, Senior Counsel Counsel for Respondent No.2:Public Prosecutor : ?. Cases referred: Nil. HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl.R.C.Nos.261 and 374 of 2014 Date:03. 06.204 Crl.R.C.No.261 of 2014: COMMON JUDGMENT: Crl.R.C.No.261 of 2014 was filed by V.Chandrasekhar and his parents against K. Bhavana @ V. Bhavana, who is the wife of V. Chandrasekhar. Bhavana, wife of Chandrasekhar in her turn filed Crl.R.C.No.374 of 2014. In Crl.R.C.No.261 of 2014, the judgment in Crl. Appeal No.397 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar arising from the orders in DVC No.20 of...
N.Jaya Ku Vs. Kandali Srinivasulu Reddy and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.7055 of 2014 and batch 03-06-2014. N.Jaya Kumar.. PETITIONER Kandali Srinivasulu Reddy and two others.. RESPONDENTs Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri S.S.R.Murthy Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2 :M/s.Barri Murali Krishna Counsel for the respondent No.3 :Addl. Public Prosecutor : ?. CITATIONS: THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.7055 and 7724 of 2014 Common Order: Both petitions are filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C, one by the father of deceased(Ashok Kumar) and the other by the Public Prosecutor representing the State seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail order granted by this Court(another bench) during vacation in Crl.P.No.5683 of 2014 in favour of the petition respondents 1 and 2, who are no other than the in-laws of the deceased.2. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent-State in both petitions and perused the mater...
Mohammed Yaseen and Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.2000 OF201203-06-2014 Mohammed Yaseen & Ors. Petitioners/A1 to A5 The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP Hyderabad & Anr.Respondents/Complainant Counsel for the petitioners:Sri Koneti Raja Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Public Prosecutor for R-1 Sri Praveen Kumar Nammaji for R-2 : : ?.CITATIONS :1992. Suppl [1]. = AIR1992SC-604 = 1992 AIR SCW-27 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.2000 OF2012The court made the following : [order follows]. ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed to quash F.I.R. in Crime No.17 of 2012 on the file of Narayanpet Police Station, Mahbubnagar district.2. Heard advocate for petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor.3. Advocate for petitioners submitted that second respondent herein earlier gave a complaint with the same allegations which was registered as Crime No.38 of 2004 and the husband moved this court to quash the proceed...
R.A.Th Vs. the Union of India, Through the Departme
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITON No.6571 of 2005 03-06-2014 R.A.Thorat.Petitioner The Union of India, through the Department of Home, New Delhi and 2 others..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.BANKATLAL MANDHANI Counsel for the respondents: Sr.PONNAM ASHOK GOUD : : ?. Cases Referred: 1. (2013) 2 SCC7402. (2010) 11 SCC3143. (2009) 3 SCC97THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.6571 of 2005 The Court made the following: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO WRIT PETITION No.6571 of 2005 ORDER: This writ petition is filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other order or direction in similar nature and quash the order dated 03.08.2004, No.R-XIII-7/2004-Admn-I passed by Inspector General of Police, S/Sector, CRPF Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad-5, arising out of Order dated 13.05.1999, No.R-XIII-23/98, Estt.III of Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF Hyderabad, arising out of Order dated 18.09.1998, No.P-VIII-5/98, Estt.2 of Commandant 113 Bn. C...
M/S.Ramakrishna Construct Vs. the Singareni Collieries Company Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITON No.4813 of 2013 03-06-2014 M/s.Ramakrishna Constructions.Petitioner The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Rep.by its General Manager, Bhupalapalli Area, Bhupalpalli, Warangal..Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.CH PURNACHANDRA RAO Counsel for the respondent: Sr.J.PRABHAKAR : : ?. Cases Referred: 1. (2011) 4 SCC2402. (2007) 5 SCC730The Court made the following: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4813 of 2013 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 01.11.2013 passed in I.A.No.740/2013 in O.S.No.1/2010 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Warangal. I have heard Sr.Ch.Purnachandra Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/defendants and Sr.J.Prabhakar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/plaintiff. The brief facts necessary for disposal of the revision petition may be stated as foll...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd Rep. by Vs. Turubilli Bharathi and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.534 of 2009 03-06-2014 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd Rep. by its Divisional Manager, Srikakulam..... Appellant Turubilli Bharathi and others. Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sri Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri Venkateswar Rao Gudapati Counsel for Respondents 2 and 3: Sri Ch. Ravinder : ?.Cases referred:1. 1995 ACJ3582)(2008) 17 SCC2083)2008 (4) ALT521= 2009 ACJ884)AIR2004SC1531THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.534 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 24-11-2008 in MVOP No.574 of 2005 passed by Chairman, MACT-cum-I Additional District Judge, Vizianagaram (for short the Tribunal), the Insurance company preferred the instant MACMA. The third respondent before the Tribunal is the appellant herein; respondents 1 and 2 before the Tribunal are respondents 2 and 3 herein and claimant before the Tribunal is the first respondent herein. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a...
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp Vs. Salma Begum and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A Nos.135 of 2009 and batch 03-06-2014 Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Hyd.and another..... Appellants Salma Begum and others.. Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sri K. Madhava Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Sri P. Ramakrishna Reddy : ?. Cases referred:1. (2009) 6 SCC1212)2013 ACJ14413)2011 ACJ14414)(2013) 9 SCC545)2003 ACJ12= AIR2003SC674THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A. Nos.135 and 1678 of 2009 COMMON JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the Award dated 12-03-2008 in MVOP No.2173 of 2006 passed by Chairman, MACT-cum-Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short the Tribunal) both the APSRTC and claimants preferred MACMA Nos.135 and 1678 of 2009 respectively. 2) The factual matrix, which led to file the present appeals, can be stated thus: a) The claimants are legal representatives of the deceasedShaik Abdul Raheem who died in a road accident on 8.8.2006. Their case is tha...
Nyathari Ba Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Through S.H
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.3194 of 2014 03-06-2014 Nyathari babu..Petitioner The State of Andhra Pradesh, through S.H.O., Gangadhara P.S., Gangadhara, Karimnagar District, rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.V.V.Ramana Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: : ?.Cases referred: 1. 2000 (1) ALT (Crl.) 174 (A.P.) HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.3194 of 2014 Date: 03.06.2014 ORDER: The petitioner is A.3. He seeks for quashment of P.R.C.No.14 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial FiRs.Class Magistrate, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District in Crime No.122 of 2011 on the file of the Gangadhara Police Station, Karimnagar District. 2. The petitioner along with 5 other accused were charge sheeted. As the petitioner was absconding, case against him was split up and case was proceeded against rest of the accused as S.C.No.204 of 2012 on the file of t...
The Apsrtc, Rep. by Its Managing Directo Vs. G.Fayaz(Minor) Rep. by Hi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-03-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.113 of 2005 03-06-2014 The APSRTC, rep. by its Managing Director,Musheerabad, Hyderabad ...Appellant G.Fayaz(minor) rep. by his mother and natural guardian G.Masthan Bee:.Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Sri B.Vinayakaswamy Counsel for respondent : Sri Kishore Kumar Reddy --- HEAD NOTE : --- ?. Cases referred:1. 1965(1) A11. E.R-563 2. 2003 ACJ12SC) 3. 2009 ACJ2020SC) 4. 2013 ACJ14035. 1963(2) All.E.R-432 6. 1969(1)A11.E.R5557. 1995 ACJ366SC) 8. 2011(12)Scale 336 9. 2013 ACJ125310. 2014 (1) SCC244at page 257 11. 2011(8) Scale 240 12. 2006 ACJ139813. 2003(9) SCC60614. 1964(1) SCR98015. 1964(3) SCR54916. 1975(1) SCC21217. 1965(3) SCR55018. Civil Appeal No.9214 of 2013 dt.17.10.2013 of the Apex Court.19. (2005) 6 SCC236HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.113 OF2005JUDGMENT: The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short, APSRTC)respondent in the claim petition filed this appeal, having been aggr...
Ravi Raja Babaiah and Anot Vs. Vemulapalli Rajeswari De
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-02-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO A.S.No.2889 of 1996 02-06-2014 Ravi Raja Babaiah and another...Appellant Vemulapalli Rajeswari Devi ...Respondent Senior Counsel for the appellants: Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyulu Senior Counsel for the respondent: Sri P.Veera Reddy, representing Sri Karri Murali Krishna and M.Sreenivasa Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred Kalyan Singh Vs. Chhoti and Others.AIR1990S.C. 396 2 Venkatachala Vs. Thimmajamma.AIR1959S.C. 443; 3 Daulat Ram Vs. Sodha . AIR2005S.C. 233 4 Shashi Kumar Banerjee Vs. Subodh Kumar Banerjee.AIR1964S.C. 529 5 Sridevi Vs. Jayaraja Shetty.AIR2005S.C. 780; S Sundaresa Pai Vs. Sumangala T Pai. AIR2002S.C. 317 6 Ram Piari Vs. Bhagwant.AIR1990S.C. 1742 7 Rabindranath Mukherjee Vs. Panchanan Banerjee .AIR1995S.C. 1684 8 Gurdev Kaur Vs. Kaki and others . AIR2006S.C. 1975 8 Venkatachala (2 supra) and Gopal Swaroop Vs. Krishna Murari.(2010) 14 S.C.C. 266 9 Jaswant Kaur Vs Amrit Kaur.AIR1977S.C. 74 10 Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. v. Regenc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »