Andhra Pradesh Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Singareni Collieries Company Limited Vs. A.Raja Murali
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-09-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.690 OF201409-06-2014 The Singareni Collieries Company Limited, rep. by its Dy. General Manager, Karimnagar District...... Appellant A.Raja Murali......Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao Counsel for respondent : Sri N. Vijay. : ?. Cases referred: Nil HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.690 OF2014JUDGMENT:- (per Honble Sri Justice Challa Kodanda Ram) This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.08.2013 passed by the single Judge of this Court in W.P.No.20029 of 2005.2. The parties to the proceedings are referred to as they are arrayed in the writ petition.3. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner questioning the proceedings Ref.No.RGI/Gdk 1/W-03/04/984 dated 26.03.2004 issued by the respondent determining his age as 25 years as on 12.01.1971. The case of the petitioner is that he was initially ...
Vidya Sagar, Goshacut,jhinsi Chowraha, H Vs. Ram Kishan Singh(Died), B ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CCCA.No.8 OF200906-06-2014 Vidya Sagar, Goshacut,Jhinsi Chowraha, Hyderabad...... APPELLANT. Ram Kishan Singh(Died), Bal Ram Singh & Others...RESPONDENTS. Counsel for Appellant : Sri VLN Gopala Krishna Murthy. Counsel for Respondents.:Sri K. Durga Prasad & Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar. GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :1. 2010(5) ALD8162. 2014(1) ALT25(SC) 3. AIR2011Bombay 136 JUDGMENT: The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.1325 of 2001 on the file of VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, is the appellant herein. The suit was originally filed against the respondents 1 to 4 herein, who are Defendant Nos. 1 to 4 in the suit. During the pendency of the suit Defendant No.1 died, and vide Orders in I.A.No.166 of 2003 dt. 13.8.2003 his Legal Representatives were impleaded as Defendants 5 to 8. Subsequently, Defendant No.3 also died and her Legal Representatives were impleaded as Defendant Nos.9 to 15, vide Orders in I.A...
M/S. Appolo Tyres L Vs. M/S. H.M. Tyres and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-06-2014
THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1590 of 2005 and BATCH0606-2014 M/s. Appolo Tyres Ltd. Appellant M/s. H.M. Tyres and another. Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sri M.S.N. Prasad !Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : B. Nagi Reddy Counsel for respondent No.4 : Public Prosecutor : Cases referred:1. AIR2003SC20352. (2000) 2 SCC3803. (2001) 8 SCC4584. (2006) 3 SCC305. (2005) 12 SCC16. (2009) 2 SCC5137. AIR2008SC13258. AIR2010SC18989. AIR2001SC389710. AIR1999SC100811. AIR2002SC18212. AIR2008SC289813. 1971 (1) An.W.R. 65 14. 2004 Crl.L.J.58 15. 2004 (1) BC3416. Appeal (Crl.) 664 of 2002, dt.20.9.2005 17. 2014 (1) ALT (Crl.) 145 THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.1590, 1591, 1592, 1594, 1595, 1596, 1597, 1598, 1599, 1600, 1601, 1602, 1652, 1653 and 1654 of 2005 COMMON JUDGMENT: The appellant-complaint M/s. Apollo Tyres Ltd., seeks to assail the 15 acquittal judgements of even dated 28.06.2001 passed by the learned IV Metropolit...
Shaik Saleema, W/O Late Shaik Gaddam Kha Vs. Apsrtc, Musheerabad, Rept ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-05-2014
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.582 of 2013 05-06-2014 Shaik Saleema, W/o Late Shaik Gaddam Khasim and another....Appellant APSRTC, Musheerabad, reptd by its Managing Director......Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Sr.G.L.Narasimha Rao Counsel for the respondent: Sr.C.Sunil Kumar Reddy Standing Counsel for APSRTC : ?.Cases Referred: NIL The Court made the following: HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CMA.No.582 of 2013 JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the order, dated 26.10.2012, in I.A.No.577 of 2012 in MVOP.No.1453 of 2008 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at NTR Nagar, Hyderabad. A24year old widow and 5 year old son of the ill-fated- Shaik Gaddam Khasim are the appellants in the present appeal. The said Shaik Gaddam Khasim died in an accident involving a bus belonging to the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short the Corporation).The appellants have filed MVOP.No.1453 of...
The Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. D.O.-1 Arundel ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
Oral Order : (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao , Member) 1. The facts of the case leading to filing of the appeal are that the respondent insured stocks worth of Rs.9,30,000/- with the appellant-insurance company for the period from 26.02.2010 to 25.02.2011. .A fire accident occurred on- 04.12.2010 as a result of which the insured items were damaged and on being informed of the accident, the appellant deputed surveyor who inspected the premises and submitted his report to the appellant. The appellant after a period of 8 months from the date of submission of the claim, offered to pay a sum of Rs..3,72,440/- for which the respondent sought for the basis for arriving at such an amount and he said to have requested the appellant to furnish him copy of the survey report. 2. The respondent has also submitted an application under the provisions of Right to Information Act with a request for furnishing him the copy of the surveyors report and the appellant had not attended to the request made by the re...
Sammeta Sriha Vs. the Statte of Andhra Pradesh Represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.312 OF200804-06-2014 Sammeta Srihari....Appellant The Statte of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Public Prosecutor and another...ResponDENTS !Counsel for the APPELLANT Counsel for Respondents: : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2003SC20352.(2000) 2 SCC3803.(2001) 8 SCC4584.(2006) 3 SCC305.(2005) 12 SCC16.(2009) 2 SCC5137.AIR2008SC13258.AIR2010SC18989.AIR2001SC389710.AIR1999SC100811.AIR2002SC18212.AIR2008SC289813.1971 (1) AN.W.R.65 14.2004 CRL.L.J.58 15.2004 (1)BC3416.2014 (1) ALT (CRL) 44(SC) 17.AIR2005SC43918.APPEAL(CRL)664 OF2002 DATED2009-2005 19.2005 (2) ALT-27 (FB) 20.2005 (CRL-J)-4209(AP) 21.AIR2003SC182HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.312 OF2008JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant-complainant Sri Sammeta Srihari assailing the acquittal judgment, dated 10.09.2007, passed by the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of 1st Class, Machilipatnam, in the private complaint case vide C.C.No....
Peddireddy Sanjeeva Re Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1509 OF200704-06-2014 Peddireddy Sanjeeva Reddy...APPELLANT The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Public Prosecutor and another...Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Head NOTE: ?.cASES REFERRED: AIR2003SC2035[2000]. 2 SCC380(2001) 8 SCC458(2006)3 SCC30[(2005) 12 SCC1 (2009) 2 SCC513AIR2008SC1325AIR2010SC1898AIR2001SC3897AIR1999SC1008AIR2002SC182AIR2008SC28981971 (1) An.W.R. 65 2004 Crl.L.J.58 2004 (1) BC34(2007) 6 SCC5552012 CRI.L.J.93 HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1509 OF200704-06-2014 JUDGMENT: The unsuccessful complainant Peddireddy Sanjeeva Reddy filed the appeal assailing the acquittal judgment, dated 21.06.2007, passed by the learned II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Machilipatnam, in the private complaint case vide C.C.No.785 of 2005 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for brevity, 'N.I. Act').2....
Smt.V.Sarad Vs. the Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthan
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.985 of 2014 04-06-2014 Smt.V.Sarada...APPELLANT The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Sr.S.Ashok Anand Kumar COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :-Sr.A.K.Jayaprakash Rao : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.985 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The compassion expressed by the Honble Supreme Court about two decades ago in the process of rescuing the family of a deceased employee has grown in proportion, beyond anybodys expectation. It would not be an exaggeration to mention that it has assumed dangerous and bewildering dimensions. Every possible distortion was given and it has reached a stage where the element of compassion has totally disappeared and the facility is being claimed much more than a right of succession. It has also become handy for the ...
Om Prakash Agarwa Vs. Khaja Krishna Prasad and Another...Respo
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.485 OF200604-06-2014 Om Prakash Agarwal.....APPELLANT Khaja Krishna Prasad and another...Respondnts Counsel for the Appellant: Counsel for Respondents: : ?.Cases Referred:1. AIR2003SC20352. (2006)3 SCC303. (2009) 2 SCC5134. AIR2010SC18985. AIR2008SC13256. AIR2001SC38977. AIR1999SC10088. AIR2002SC1829. AIR2008SC289810. 1971 (1) An.W.R. 65 11. 2012(13) SCC112. 2007(7) SCC39413. 1999(3) SCC114. (2014 (1) ALT Crl.145 JUDGMENT: The unsuccessful complainant in C.C.No.4 of 1998 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kothagudem, is the appellant herein.2. The parties are being referred as arrayed before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.3. The facts, in brief, are that the complainant filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, the Act) against the accused alleging that the accused borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- from the complainant and th...
L.Hanuman Prasad and O Vs. G.Nagendra Gound and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-04-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR MACMA Nos.1015 of 2005 04-06-2014 L.Hanuman Prasad and othersAppellants G.Nagendra Gound and othersRespondent Counsel for the Petitioner:Subramanyam Counsel for the Respondents:Srinivas Rao Vutla : : ?.Cases Referred: 1.2013 Law Suit (SC) 751 2.2014 (1) ALT512(D.B.) 3.2009 (6) ALT784(D.B.) 4.2013 (4) ALT35(SC) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.1015 of 2005 & M.A.C.M.A.No.77 of 2006 COMMON JUDGMENT:- Since the parties, issues involved and facts of the case are one and the same in both these appeals and both these appeals arise out of the same award, both these appeals are being disposed of by this common order. Challenging the common award dated 04.02.2005 passed in MOP Nos.786 and 787 of 2003 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum II Additional District Judge, Visakhapantam (the Tribunal, for brevity).MACMA No.1015 of 2005 has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation and MACMA No.77 of 2006 has bee...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »