Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.714 of 2014 27-06-2014 The State Bank of India and others...APPELLANTS T.V.S.Brahmachary....RESPONDENT : COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS:- Sr.K.Srinivasa Murthy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:-Sr.V.Hari Haran ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT APPEAL No.714 of 2014 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The respondents in W.P.No.1611 of 2003 filed this writ appeal. The sole respondent herein filed the writ petition feeling aggrieved by the order of removal, dated 03.10.2001, as confirmed in the appeal. A learned Single Judge of this Court allowed the writ petition by modifying the punishment. Briefly stated, the facts are that the respondent joined the services of appellant No.1-Bank as a Clerk-cum-Cashier on 10.03.1979. He worked as Deputy Head Assistant (Cash) at Kothapet Branch of Vijayawada between 1995 and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.5056 OF201425-6-2014 Dr.P.Malathi...Petitioner. The States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh and another. Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.R.N.HEMENDRANATH REDDY Counsel respondents : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. Sr.N.NAVEEN KUMAR HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: (2013) 7 SCC7892 2009 CRI.L.J.822 3 (2013) 3 SCC3304 (1995) 5 SCC7675 (2004) 6 SCC4226 (2005) 6 SCC17 IV (2013) ACC68(SC) 8 (2014) I SCC (Cri) 102 9 (2009) 3 SCC110 (2009) 9 SCC221CRIMINAL PETITION No.5077 OF2014HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.5056 OF2014& 5077 OF2014Common Order: These two Criminal Petitions are filed by two accused i.e., A.1 an A.3 in C.C.No.171 of 2014 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Nampally to quash the proceedings against them. Heard both sides. Advocate for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3379 OF201425-06-2014 Rajkumar Bharatlal Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Yadgir Rao COUNSEL FOR rESPONDENTS1& 3 TO7: G.P.for Endowments Counsel for RespondentNo.ww2: Sri.Y.Ravinda Counsel for Respondent No.8: Sri C.H.Satish Kumar (Standing Counsel for Endowments, Telengana) Counsel for Respondent No.s.9 & 10: Sri M.Adinarayana Raju : ?. Cases Referred: THE HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.3379 of 2014 ORDER: (per the Honble The Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) In this Writ Petition, portion of the order of the Honble Lokayukta has been challenged basically by way of modification before this Court contending that the Honble Lokayukta has no jurisdiction to grant interim relief but can enquire into the matter finally and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.Nos.16179 of 2000 AND BATCH2506-2014 Mr.S.Prasad Reddy and others..Petitioners Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad.Respondent Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.S.Ravi Counsel for respondent: Sr.S.R.Ashok HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: 1.AIR2001SUPREME COURT38682.259 ITR2583.364 ITR190THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM W.P.Nos.16179, 16183 & 16186 of 2000 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J.The subject matter of these three writ petitions is similar. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. The petitioners are the assessees under the Income Tax Act (for short the Act).There was some delay on their part in filing Income Tax Returns for the assessment year 1995-96. While there was default in payment of a portion of advance tax referable to the assessment year, there was deferment of payment of advance tax in respect of the other portion. Ultima...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA R.C. No.160 of 2000 24-06-2014 Rajkumar. ... APPLICANT The Commissioner of Gift Tax...RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Sri Y.Ratnakar COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :-Sri S.R.Ashok : ?.Cases Referred:1. (2000) 246 ITR6092.(1965) 55 ITR637(SC) 3.(1961) 41 ITR297(Madras) THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM R.C.No.160 of 2000 ORDER: (per the Honble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This reference is made under Section 26 (1) of the Gift Tax Act, 1958 (for short the Act) by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench A (for short the Tribunal). The circumstances that led to the making of the reference are as under: The applicant, his brother Sri Arjun Das, and their mother Smt.Susheela Devi jointly owned a building at Nizamabad. In addition to that, the two brothers held an open land at Nizamabad in common. The building was leased to the State Bank of India at mo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WRIT PETITION Nos.6470 of 2006 23-06-2014 Kondamudi Chandrasekhara Rao..... PETITIONER State Bank of India, Zonal Office, Vijayawada, rep. By its Assistant General Manager nd others .....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Challa Ajay Kumar Counsel for respondents : Sri P.Vishnuvardhan Reddy Dr. Y.Padmavathi : ?.Cases referred:1. 1987(4) SCC6912. AIR1966SC16723. 1993(1) SCC714. 2002(3) LLJ2095. AIR1991SC1016. AIR1986SC9547. (1993) 1 SCC718. (1995) 2 SCC3269. 1998(7) SCC6610. 1997(7) SCC59211. 1993(3) SCC25912. AIR1995SC92213. AIR1991SC10114. 1979 (2) ALT41115. 1981 SCC125316. 2004(1) LLJ19017. 1991(2) SCC59918. 1992(2) SCC2919. 1995 Supp. (4) SCC11120. 2004(1) LLJ (Feb) 227 21. 1992(4) SCC11822. 2001(1) LLJ59623. 2003(3) LLJ90424. 1979(2) LLJ8025. 1986(2) LLJ62426. 2002(3) LLJ22927. AIR1966SC167228. 1979(2) ALT41129. 2004(1) LLJ19030. 2009 12 SCC4931. 2009 3 SCC3532. 2006 (1) SCC66733. 2007 (1) SCC40834. AIR2007631.35. 2008 AIR SCW399636. 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY COMPANY APPEAL Nos.4 of 2014 and batch 23-6-2014 Union of India, New Delhi,Reptd by its Assistant Director-Sr.D.A.Sampath.Petitioner Tech Mahindra Limited,Mumbai, represented by its Company Secretary Mr.G.Jayaraman,Hyderabad and others.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.C.Raghu Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sr.S.Ravi, Senior Counsel for Sr.K.Vivek Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: (2005) 1 SCC212HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY COMPANY APPEAL Nos.4 & 5 of 2014 Date : 23-6-2014 The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: These Company Appeals arise out of order, dated 16.10.2012, in Company Application Nos.233 and 234/621A/CB/2010 of the Company Law Board, Chennai Bench, Chennai. The facts, in brief, leading to the filing of these Company Appeals are stated hereunder: M/S.Satyam Computer Services Limited (for short the Company) which was subsequently renamed as Tech Mahindra Limited, in pursuance of the order of merger...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO A.S.No.497 of 1992 20-06-2014 Burugupalli Sesharatnam.Appellant. 1.Sirigina Ramalakshmi and others.. Respondents. Counsel for the appellant : Sri K.V.Satyanarayana !Counsel for the respondents 1 & 5: Sri Narasimha Rao Davuluri HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred 2007 (5) ALT4472 (2011) 9 S.C.C. 788 3 (2009) 6 S.C.C. 99 4 AIR1955Madras 705 (D.B.) 5 (1969) 1 S.C.C. 748 THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO A.S.No.497 of 1992 JUDGMENT This appeal is filed challenging the judgment and decree dt.15-04-1991 in O.S.No.137 of 1982 of the Subordinate Judge at Tanuku.2. Appellant is plaintiff in the above suit. She filed the suit for partition of the plaint A & B schedule properties into six equal shares and for possession of one such share to her, future profits and costs.3. The plaintiff, defendant nos.2 and 3 are children of one Suryarao through his first wife. After her death, Suryarao married again. Defendant no.1 is his second wife and def...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.7004 of 2014 20-06-2014 C. Mallesh Rao,S/o.C. Narsimha,Aged 58 years, Occ: Advocate,R/o. 1-1-17/8, RTC X Roads,Hyderabad 500 020. ..... Petitioner The Special Dy. Collector/Land Acquisition Officer,International Airport, Shamshabad,Rangareddy District, Office of the District Collector (LA) Rangareddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad & 2 others ..... Respondents Counsel for Petitioner :Sri D. Goverdhanachary Counsel for Respondents:Government Pleader for Land Acquisition GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?. Cases referred :2005. (3) ALD233(LB) 1997 (5) ALD7482002 (1) ALD2011998 (6) ALD (SCSN) 20 HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.7004 of 2014 The Court made the following: HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.7004 of 2014 ORDER: Proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act), were initiated and land to an extent of Ac. 825.39 guntas, situated in Gollapalli Kalan Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION CASE No.1632 of 2013 20-06-2014 Ambari Mohini (died) and others .Petitioners/Plaintiffs Peddireddy Bhagyamma..Respondent/Defendant. Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.K.V.Bhanu Prasad. Counsel for Respondent:Sr.P.Devendar. : : ?. Cases referred: 1. 2009 (2) ALT19(SC) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1632 of 2013 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/plaintiffs and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/defendant. This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order passed by the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal in O.S.N.41 of 2006. The brief facts relevant for considering the present Civil Revision Petition are that the revision petitioners filed a suit for perpetual injunction and also for mandatory injunction in respect of the schedule mentioned property against the defendant. Apart from seeking permanent injunction against ...
Tag this Judgment!