Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B.Suresh Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.23567 of 2001 09-04-2014 B.Suresh BabuAppellant State of Andhra Pradesh and othersRespondent Counsel for the Petitioners:Sreeramachandra Murthy Counsel for the Respondents: G.P.for Higher Education : : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR Writ Petition No.23567 of 2001 & Contempt Case No.48 of 2014 Common Order:- W.P.No.23567 of 2001 has been filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the notification dated 22.02.2002 issued by the third respondent without any consideration of the in-service candidates and the selection of the fourth respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and for a direction to the consider the case of the petitioner herein for appointment in the aided vacancy in the third respondent college. The petitioners specific case is that he belongs to Scheduled Caste community (SC-C).HE passed B.Com., in the year 1989-90 and M.Co.in t...
N.Surendra Ba Vs. Narasimha Reddy and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A Nos.3763 of 2009 and batch 07-04-2014 N.Surendra Babu.Appellant Narasimha Reddy and another. Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.S.V.Muni Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sr.Sriman : ?.Cases referred: 1) (2011) 1 Supreme Court Cases 343 2) 2013 ACJ1395= AIR2013SC2629THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.Nos.3763 of 2009 and 54 of 2010 Common Judgment: Aggrieved by the Award in MVOP No.305 of 2007 passed by MACT-cum-III Additional District Judge, Tirupathi (for short the Tr 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) On 04-08-2006 at about 5 PM when the claimant was boarding the bus bearing No.AP03U2977in front of Ladies Club near Co b) FiRs.respondent remained ex-parte. c) Second respondent/Insurance Company filed counter and opposed the claim denying all the material averments in the petition c) During trial PWs.1 to 3 were examined and Exs.A1 to A6 and X1 and X2 were marked on behalf of the claimant. Policy c...
The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. Vs. M/S Rajkamal Transport Co., Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant insured his lorry bearing registration No.AP 10W 2610 with the opposite party vide policy bearing No.430011/31/2012/031175 which is valid from 29.03.2011 to 29.03.2012. While so on 27.07.2011 at 23.00 hours on National Highway no.9 a lorry bearing registration NO.MS 15BJ 8832 dashed against the lorry of the complainant as a result if it the insured lorry damaged and also the driver and the assistant of the driver received grievous injuries. The PS Omerga registered a case in Crime No.150 of 2011 dated 28.07.2011 u/s 279, 337 of IPC. The complainant got the vehicle repaired by incurring an amount of Rs.4,98,563/- and thereafter he made a claim with the opposite party for reimbursement of the amount but the opposite party did not pay the same. Hence, the complain...
M. Raja Manohar Vs. Superintendent Central Copying Section Principal D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
T. Ashok Kumar, Member 1. This complaint is filed U/s.17(a)(i) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the Superintendent Central Copying Section, District and Sessions Court, Sanga Reddy, Medak District and two others seeking direction to pay exemplary damages/compensation of Rs.37,88,300/- together with costs of Rs.10,000/-. 2. The facts leading to the present case in brief are that the Station House Officer P.S. Indra Karan, Ordnance Factory Medak filed final report in FIR 06 of 2010 at SHO/PS Indra Karan, Ordnance Factory Medak Estate, Yedumailaram, Medak District before Addl Judicial First Class Magistrate Sanga Reddy (AJFCM). On 5.5.2010 assailing the final report the complainant filed protest petition under the provisions of Cr.P.C. before AJFCM concerned and the opposite party no.2 postponed it till the middle of July 2010. The complainant due to sickness did not attend the court on the date of adjournment and thereafter on 4.8.2010 the opposite ...
The Oriental Insurance Co.,ltd. Khairatabad, Hyderabad Rep. by Its Man ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
Oral Order: (Thota Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. For convenience sake the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to hereunder. 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant insured his lorry bearing registration No.AP 10W 2610 with the opposite party vide policy bearing No.430011/31/2012/031175 which is valid from 29.03.2011 to 29.03.2012. While so on 27.07.2011 at 23.00 hours on National Highway no.9 a lorry bearing registration NO.MS 15BJ 8832 dashed against the lorry of the complainant as a result if it the insured lorry damaged and also the driver and the assistant of the driver received grievous injuries. The PS Omerga registered a case in Crime No.150 of 2011 dated 28.07.2011 u/s 279, 337 of IPC. The complainant got the vehicle repaired by incurring an amount of Rs.4,98,563/- and thereafter he made a claim with the opposite party for reimbursement of the amount but the opposite party did not pay the same. Hence, the complain...
Gilla Laxmi Vs. Choudarapu Rajamani and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant and he filed this appeal questioning the order dated 17-4-2012 made in C.C.No.200/2006 on the file of District Forum, Karimnagar whereby the District Forum dismissed the complaint. It may not be necessary for us to go into the various facts narrated by both the parties. Having considered the submissions made by both the counsel, this Commission is of the view that this matter can be settled amicably between the parties and accordingly advised the parties. Now both the parties have come forward stating that they are getting the matter settled and the respondents/opposite parties offered to pay an amount of Rs.45,000/- (Rupees Forty five thousand only) towards full and final settlement and agreed to pay the said amount within a period of three months. If the said amount is not paid within three months, the appellant/complainant is at liberty to get the matter executed before the District Forum, in...
B. Yadagiri and Another Vs. G. Appa Rao and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) This revision petition is directed against the orders in I.A.No.34/2014 in E.A.No.27/2012 in C.C.No.376/2011 whereby the District Forum-III, Hyderabad by its order dated 06-2-2014 dismissed the petition to discharge the petitioners as sureties. The respondent No.1 herein approached the District Forum and filed a complaint which was numbered as C.C.No.376/2011 and the said complaint was allowed. As against the said order passed by the District Forum, the opposite party No.1 filed an appeal, F.A.No.320/2013 before this Commission and this Commission on 02-4-2013 granted stay till 06-6-2013. The opposite party No.2 approached this Commission and filed F.A.No.639/2012 and the said appeal was dismissed for default by this Commission by order dated 13-9-2013 against which the petitioners/opposite parties herein approached Honble High Court of A.P. and filed W.P.No.22859/2013 and also W.P.M.P.No.28034/2013 and the High Court while admitting the sa...
1.Sarosh Sam Bastawala and Another Vs. State of A.P., Represented by A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P. No.634 of 2009 04-04-2014 1.Sarosh Sam Bastawala and another State of A.P., represented by Asifnagar Police Station, Hyderabad through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A,.P., Hyderabad, and others. Counsel for the petitioners: Petitioner No.2 appeared in person Counsel for the first respondent: Public Prosecutor 1. (2005) 3 SCC2992AIR2005SC7573 (2008) 9 SCC6774 (2012) 10 SCC3035(2003) 4 SCC6756(2008) 16 SCC17 (2012) 11 SCC321ORAL ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by A-1 and A-2 under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in CC No.650/2002 on the file of VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad, which was taken on file for an offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. Originally, only the State represented by Public Prosecutor was made respondent. Subsequently, respondents 2 to 7 were impleaded as respondents pursuant to an order dt. 20-3- 2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1434/2009.2. The allegations in the...
P. Nageswaramma Vs. the Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) Complainant is the appellant and she had approached this Commission questioning the order dated 05.06.2013 made by the District Consumer Forum, Kurnool in C.C.No.52/2012 whereby the assured amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest at 24% per annum, compensation and costs were rejected by the said Forum. The brief facts as per the complainant are that she is the sister of one P.Obulesu and during his life time the said Obulesu insured his life with the opposite parties Insurance Company for an amount of Rs.3,00,000/-, vide policy No.655754342 and also paid a premium of Rs.24,260/-. Subsequent to the taking of the policy, the said Obulesu died on 08.06.2010 due to heart attack. As the complainant is the sister and nominee as per the said policy, she approached the opposite parties and made the said claim, but however the same was rejected stating that though the insured i.e. Obulesu was aged about 50 years, the said fact was not disclosed and it...
P. Ramesh Babu Vs. Divisional Engineer, Operation/Town-ii and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The complainant is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the order made in CC.No.82/2011 dated 17TH January, 2013 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Nellore whereby the District Forum while allowing the complaint filed by the complainant i.e. the appellant herein however has not chosen to award any compensation or costs. The brief facts as per the complaint filed u/s.12 of the Consumer Protection Act are as under: The complainant constructed Shiridi Sai Residency apartments and got electricity service connection to the fourth floor from the opposite parties. He deposited an amount of Rs.4,850/- on 16.08.2011 with the authorities for obtaining the electricity service connection. The electricity service connection was not provided even after one month. He got issued a notice on 21.09.2011 calling upon the opposite parties to provide electricity service connection. The opposite parties remained silent even after receipt of...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »