Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gunja Yesu (A.2) and Ot Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.274 of 2010 and batch 10-04-2014 Gunja Yesu (A.2) and others Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Smt.Gayatri Reddy Counsel for respondent:Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeals No.274 and 364 of 2010 10th April, 2014 Criminal Appeals No.274 and 364 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) Rudrakshapally, a village situated at a distance of 10 KMs., towards east of Sathupally, Khammam District, was witness to a horrendous evening on 21-12-2005. When the villagers just retired to their homes, the heartrending incident committed by persons of maniac manifestations and beyond human comprehension of a diabolical nature, was unleashed. The ghastly incident, which spanned just over few mi...
Adipudi Rajyalakshmi and Oth Vs. Chebrolu Ankamma Rao and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.848 of 2005 10-04-2014 Adipudi Rajyalakshmi and others Appellants Chebrolu Ankamma Rao and others Respondents Counsel for the Appellants:Sr.A. Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondents:Sr.K.K.Chakravarthy : : ?.Cases Referred: 1. (2013) 9 SCC54HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR M.A.C.M.A.No.848 of 2005 Judgment: This appeal is preferred by the claimants being aggrieved by the award dated 04.11.2004 passed in MVOP No.280 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge, Guntur, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.50,000/- out of the total claim of Rs.3,00,000/-. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of convenience. The brief facts of the case are as follows. On 20.06.1998 the deceased was proceeding as a pillion rider on the scooter of the fiRs.respondent bearing no.AP-7E-2148. When they reached near Pothuru the accident occur...
1.Mirza Jawed Ahmed Baig and Anot Vs. State of A.P., Represented by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P.No.3726 OF201410-4-2014 1.Mirza Jawed Ahmed Baig and another ..Petitioner State of A.P., represented by its Public Prosecutor, A.P.High Court, Hyderabad and another...Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.Mohd. Muzaffer Ullah Khan Counsel for the fiRs.respondent: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the second respondent: None appeared 1. 2013 (1) ALD (Crl) 814 (SC) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P No.3726/2014 ORAL ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by A-2 and A-3 under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of proceedings in PRC No.50/2013 on the file of Additional Judicial FiRs.Class Magistrate, Nizamabad. A charge sheet came to be filed against the petitioners and another for an offence punishable under section 304-B IPC. The allegations in the charge sheet are as under: The marriage of Miraj Fatima (deceased) with A-1 took place three years prior to the date of incident. At the time of marriage, the parents of Miraj Fatima ga...
Jagu Annava Vs. State Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by Its Public
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.480 of 2014 10-04-2014 Jagu Annavaram Petitioner State Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad, through its S.H.O., Bhadrachalam Town P.S.Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Krishna Kishore Kovvuri Counsel for the Respondents: : ?.Cases referred: HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. R.C.No.480 of 2014 Date: 10.04.2014 ORDER: The petitioner filed a private complaint before the learned Judicial FiRs.Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam alleging that two On the basis of reference under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C., Bhadrachalam Town Police Station issued FIR in Crime No.122 of 2013 2. The learned Magistrate would not appear to have passed any detailed order as to why he was directing police to regist 3. That apart, when the complaint is laid under various sections, if the learned Magistrate is referring the complaint u 4. The learned Magistrate in the present case passed a cryptic order sending a complaint to police in respect of...
Jagu Annavar Vs. State Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by Its Public
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.480 of 2014 10-04-2014 Jagu Annavaram Petitioner State Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad, through its S.H.O., Bhadrachalam Town P.S.,Khammam District,and 2 otheRs.Respondent Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Krishna Kishore Kovvuri Counsel for the Respondents: : ?. Cases referred: Nil HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl. R.C.No.480 of 2014 ORDER: The petitioner filed a private complaint before the learned Judicial FiRs.Class Magistrate, Bhadrachalam alleging that two persons who are wife and husband committed various offences under Sections 468, 471, 474, 420, 427, 448 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC. The learned Magistrate referred the same to police on 03.04.2013 directing police to register an FIR under Sections 427, 448 and 506 r/w Sec.34 IPC. The learned Magistrate, consequently, omitted the offences under Sections 468, 471, 474 and 420 IPC in the reference. On the basis of reference under Section 156 ...
P.Lakshminarayana and Anoth Vs. T.Madhu Babu and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.667 of 2013 10-04-2014 P.Lakshminarayana and another .Appellants T.Madhu Babu and others.Respondents Counsel for the appellants: Mr.P.Gangaiah Naidu, Senior Counsel, For Mr.N.Bharath Babu Counsel for the respondents: Mr.D.Hanumantha Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. CITATIONS: JUDGMENT: This civil miscellaneous appeal arises out of order dated 17.07.2013 in I.A.No.3 of 2013 in O.S.No.7 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati. The appellants herein filed O.S.No.7 of 2013 for permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein from interfering with their possession of the property bearing Municipal Door No.18-8-39C comprised in Sy.No.2/2 situated at Ward No.18, Madhura Nagar, Tirupati Municipal Corporation. It is the pleaded case of the appellants that one T. Munaswamy Naidu, paternal grandfather of respondents 1 to 4, sold 0.28 cents of land, forming part of suit schedule land, to one T.G.V...
A. Sri Hari Kumar Raju Vs. the Managing Director Icici Bank Ltd., âan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainant is the appellant and he filed this appeal against the orders dated 05-8-2013 made in C.C.No.627/2012 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad whereby the District Forum awarded only an amount of Rs.5,000/- as against the claim of Rs.25,000/- for each day delay in delivery of documents towards compensation totalling Rs.17,78,084. The brief facts are that the complainant availed a housing loan from the opposite parties and the entire amount was paid by him on 06-1-2012. At the time when he borrowed the said loan amount, he deposited certain documents towards security. As he paid the entire loan amount, he requested the opposite parties to return the said documents, but however the said documents were delivered only on 22-2-2012 i.e. after a lapse of 45 days. In those circumstances, the complainant alleged that he suffered mental agony and he is entitled for compensation and damages and hence he approached the District Forum...
Vijaya Vs. Senior Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Life Insuranc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainant is the appellant and she filed this appeal questioning the order dated 30-4-2013 made in S.R.No.2556/2012 on the file of District Forum-II, Hyderabad whereby the District Forum dismissed the said petition stating that it has no power of review. Smt.Vijaya, who is the wife of late Sekhar, filed a complaint in C.C.No.175/2011 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District against the insurance company claiming the insurance amount on account of death of her husband by name, Mr.Sekhar. The matter was entrusted to Mr.K.N.V.Radha Krishna, Advocate to appear on her behalf. The insurance company filed its written version and at the stage when the matter was coming up for affidavit evidence of the complainant, Smt.Vijaya, the said advocate appearing for her, met with an accident and was totally bed ridden and in those circumstances, he could not appear before the District Forum and the District Forum dismissed the said complain...
P. Alekhya Vs. Bharat Institute of Technology and Science for Women, R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainant approached the District Forum, Rangareddy District and filed the complaint, C.C.No.176/2012, against the opposite party, which is a Engineering College, claiming refund of the amounts paid by her i.e. admission fee, examination fee and fare towards transportation to a tune of Rs.40,370/-, Rs. 9 lakhs towards mental agony and Rs.10 lakhs towards compensation for loss of an academic year. The District Forum having considered the entire evidence on record, by its order dated 20-5-2013 negated her contentions, but, however, directed the Engineering College to return the transfer certificates and other certificates to the complainant/appellant without collecting any fee. The said order is questioned in this appeal. The brief facts that led to the filing of the complaint in brief are as follows: The appellant took admission into the college of the opposite party thinking that it is a college meant for women only and the college ma...
Faiz Mohammed Khan. Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMIAL APPEAL Nos.713 of 2010 and batch 09-04-2014 Faiz Mohammed Khan...APPELLANT State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Sr.T.Bal Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos.713, 704, 711 and 743 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These four appeals are presented by A1 to A5 in S.C.No.222 of 2003 on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. Through its judgment, dated 04.05.2010, the trial Court convicted the accused for the offence of committing murder of one Sr.Mannan Ghori at 5.45 p.m.on 10.07.2002 in a narrow lane near Panchmohalla, Hussainialam, Hyderabad. Sentence of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of fifteen days was imposed. They ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »