Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Byreddy Rajasekhara R Vs. State Rep.by Its Public Prosecutor, High
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4138 of 2014 15-04-2014 Byreddy Rajasekhara Reddy.Petitioner/A7 State rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another..Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.T.NIRANJAN REDDY, Senior Counsel Sr.V.LAKSHMI HARISH Counsel for the respondent No.1: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ^Counsel for the respondent No.2: Sr.O.KAILASNATH REDDY : ?. Cases Referred: 1. AIR2011SC3122. (2012) 4 SCC3793. AIR1985SC969THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4138 of 2014 The Court made the following: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.4138 of 2014 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C.seeking anticipatory bail for the petitioner/A7 in Cr.No.1 2. I have heard Sr.T.Niranjan Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner/A7, Sr.O.Kailasnath Reddy, 3. The brief facts necessary for considering the anticipatory bail, as per prosecution are as follows: a) The deceased...
A.Ashok Vardhan Re Vs. Smt. P. Saritha,and 2 Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2014
HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.15 of 2014 15-04-2014 A.Ashok Vardhan Reddy Petitioner Smt.P.Saritha,and 2 otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.Vedula Venkataramana, Senior counsel for petitioner Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.P. Krishna Reddy, Counsel for R-1 : ?.Cases referred: 1. 2012 CRI.L.J.309 2. 2010 LawSuit (Del) 3145 3. 2012 CRI.L.J.3462 4. 2013 CRI.L.J.3909 HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Crl.R.C.No.15 of 2014 Date: 15.04.2014 ORDER: The revision is laid by the husband of the fiRs.respondent challenging the judgment in Criminal Appeal No.151 of 2013 on th The trial Judge partly allowed the DVC No.4 of 2009. The husband and the father of the husband, who is the second respondent 2. The husband preferred Criminal Appeal No.151 of 2013 before the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad questio 3. The marriage between the main parties was solemnized on 27.08.2005. On the date of marriage itself, the wife had to The husband subsequently joined the ...
Rentachintala Chandrasekhar and Another Vs. M/S. Aliens Developers Pri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) This complaint is filed through General Power of Attorney Holder U/s.17 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for a direction to the opposite parties to refund Rs.23,06,603/- paid by them together with interest at 18% p.a. from the date of respective payments till realization together with compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- totalling to Rs.48,54,857.25/-. The case of the complainants is that they are currently residing at USA and believing the representations made by the opposite parties, they intended to purchase a residential flat and entered into an agreement of sale with the opposite parties on 26-3-2008 to purchase Flat No.942 Station -7 on 9th floor having super built up area of 1687 sq ft. together with 36.27 sq. yds. of undivided share and two car parking space and the said flat was booked on 16-10-2006 by paying an advance of Rs.1 lakh for a consideration of Rs.44,06,421/-. The complainants submit that out of the total consideration of Rs.44...
Swarna Lakshmi Narayana,s/O Late Bhadrai Vs. the Special Secretary, Fr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.2699 of 2009 11-04-2014 Swarna Lakshmi Narayana,S/o Late Bhadraiah, aged about 81 years,....Petitioner The Special Secretary, Freedom Fighters Division,Ministry of Home AffaiRs.Loknayak Bhavan,New Delhi and two other..Respon Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.K.Chinna Baba Counsel for Respondents: Sr.Adhi Venkateshwarlu : : ?.Cases referred: 1 (2001) 8 SCC81 (2012) 11 SCC7541 2013 (5) ALD173THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.2699 of 2009 Dated 11th April, 2014 ORDER: Initially, the petitioner herein filed this writ petition assailing Lr.No.112/6197/97-FF(HC)(A).dated 04.08.2006 of the fiRs.respondent herein, suspending the Freedom Fighters Pension for the 2. While ordering Rule nisi, this Court in W.P.M.P.No.3466/2009 on 03.07.2009, passed an interim order, directing the respond 3. According to the petitioner herein, he fought against Nizam Government for the merger of Hyderabad State into Indian Union 4. In the coun...
B.Padm Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-11-2014
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.596 OF201211-4-2014 B.Padma.....Petitioner. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another.Respondents. Counsel for the petitioner: SRI R.RAMANJANEYULU. Counsel for 1st respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. Counsel for 2nd respondent: B.ANJAIAH HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.596 OF2012ORDER: This petition is filed to quash F.I.R. No.552 of 2011 of Station House Officer, Meerpet, Cyberabad.2. Brief facts leading to this petition are as follows: Second respondent herein filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before II Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar and the court forwarded the said complaint to Station House Officer, Meerpet under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C. for investigation and on that, concerned police registered it as Crime No.552 of 2011 and issued F.I.R. Aggrieved by the registration of F.I.R., A...
Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Corporation, Rep. by Its S. Rama Rao-gen ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corporation is the appellant and this appeal is directed against the orders dated 03-6-2013 made in C.C.No.3/2012 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District whereby the District Forum awarded interest at the rate of 18% p.a. as claimed by the complainant i.e respondent herein. The brief facts which led the complainant to approach the District Forum are as under: The appellants are selling flats under Rajiv Swagruha scheme and the respondent/complainant paid processing fee of Rs.5,000/- along with an application for two bed room flat. Pursuant there to, the appellant addressed a letter on 05-11-2008 informing the respondent that he was allotted a flat and the tentative cost of the said flat would be Rs.13,00,000/- and the said amount should be paid in three instalments. According to the complainant, he paid the entire consideration as agreed upon but the opposite parties have not come forward to get the flat regi...
The Branch Manager, Lic of India Warangal-1 and Others Vs. Parikirala ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The Life Insurance Corporation of India is the appellant and this appeal is directed against C.C.No.26/2012 dated 28-6-2013 on the file of District Forum, Warangal whereby the District Forum allowed the complaint directing the opposite parties to pay an amount of Rs.1 lakh to the complainant along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 02-12-2011 till the date of realization together with Rs.1000/- towards legal expenditure and Rs.1000/- towards costs. The brief facts as per the complaint narrated by the complainant are as under: The complainants mother one Parkirala Sammakka, during her life time obtained Jeevan Saral Policy bearing No.688890913 for Rs.1,00,000/- from opposite party No.1 commencing from 15-3-2010 and the complainant is the nominee under the said policy. While so, the said Sammakka died on 21-4-2011 due to heart attack and the complainant made a claim to opposite party No.1 in May, 2011 and ...
Bhpv Employees Cooperative Thrift and Credit Society Limited Vs. Konda ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
GopalaKrishna Tamada, President B.H.P.V.Employees Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Limited is the appellant and this appeal is directed against C.C.No.369/2011 dated 29-3-2012 on the file of District Forum-I Visakhapatnam whereby the District Forum passed the following order: œIn the result, the complaint is allowed directing the opposite party to pay the complainant Rs10,000/- with 9% interest p.a. from 08-6-2007 to till the date of payment and also to pay an amount of Rs.10,000/- with 12% interest p.a. from 13-7-2002 to 13-7-2008 and to pay 9% interest p.a. on Rs.10,000/- from 14-7-2008 to till the date of payment. The opposite party is further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- towards compensation besides costs of Rs.3,000/-. Advocate fee is fixed at Rs.1,500/-? The brief facts as narrated by the complainant in the complaint are as under: The complainants father is an employee working in B.H.P.V. and has become a depositor of the said credit society and deposited an amount of R...
Shaik Rafi Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMIAL APPEAL No.271 of 2010 10-04-2014 Shaik Rafi....APPELLANT State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT:- Sr.T.Bal Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Public Prosecutor : ?. Cases Referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.271 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The sole accused in S.C.No.37 of 2007 on the file of the Special Judge for Trial of offences under the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989- cum-V Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nellore was tried for the offence of committing murder of Smt.Shaik Rahamthubi in the morning of 21.07.2006 at Atmakur. Through its judgment, dated 28.01.2010, the trial Court convicted him of the said offence and imposed the punishment of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default to undergo simple impr...
M.Gajendra R Vs. State of A.P.Represented by Public Pros
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal Nos.275 of 2010 and batch 10-04-2014 M.Gajendra Reddy appellant State of A.P.represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Respondent Counsel for appellant: Smt.Vasundara Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Additional Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal Nos.275 & 278 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) One Sr.Muneppa of Bellakogila Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, had two wives. Through his fiRs.wife, he had three sons, including Muni Venkatappa PW.1, and through second wife, he had a son, by name, Venkatesu and a daughter Papamma. The children through the two wives are said to be living separately. Venkatesu was married to Prameela A.2, in 1993, and they had two children. The spouses were said to be attending the agricultural w...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »