Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
T.Nagaraju and Others Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMIAL APPEAL No.1298 of 2010 22-04-2014 T.Nagaraju and others....APPELLANTS State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS:- Sr.V.Ravi Kiran Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :- Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1298 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) To connote or point out that the evidence in a given case is very weak, the general adage used is that even a dog cannot be convicted with the evidence on record. This case presents an example of that. It is rather unfortunate that six persons are languishing in jail since 2010 on being convicted and handed out the sentence of imprisonment for life. On every aspect, the case proceeded, just on the wrong lines. P.W.2 is said to be a person hailing from Vijayawada, doing business in real estate. He is the nephew of P.W....
The National Insurance Companu Ltd., Rep Vs. Yeliminti Appanna and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI Civil Revision Petition No.994 of 2012 22-04-2014 The National Insurance Companu Ltd., Rep.by its Divisional Manager, Visakhapatnam...Petitioner Yeliminti Appanna and another...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri T.Ramulu Counsel for Respondents:None Appeared. : ?.Cases referred:2007. ACJ1897C.R.P.No.3488 of 2011, dated 04.02.2013 (APHC) 2004 ACJ19962009 ACJ19372013 (6) ALD226ORDER: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 28.11.2011 passed by the learned Principal District Judge-cum-Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Srikakulam (`the Tribunal, for short) in E.P. 79 of 2011 in M.V.O.P.No.144 of 2008. The issue involved in the revision is in regard to the correctness or otherwise of the income tax deducted [or to be deducted]. at source, the position of law and the correct procedure that ought to be followed by the Insurance Company at the time of the deduction of tax at source from the amount of compensation/ in...
Smt. Lata Ja Vs. Laxminivas Agarwal and the State of Andh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.2226 of 2014 22-04-2014 Smt. Lata Jain .Petitioner. Laxminivas Agarwal and The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ... Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Sarvabhouma Rao Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.2226 of 2014 Date:22.04.2014 ORDER: This petition is filed to quash proceedings in C.C.No.666/2013 on the file of IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.2. Brief facts of the case are as follows:- First respondent herein filed a private complaint before IX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for the offences under Sections 182, 191, 193, 211, 384, 385, 420, 120-B & 34 IPC. Learned Metropolitan Magistrate, after recording sworn statement of complainant and witness by name Shyamsunder Agarwal, took cognizance for an offence under Section 182 IPC ...
Manda Veeresham and Anot Vs. Md. Ahmed and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.148 of 2007 21-04-2014 Manda Veeresham and another.. Appellants Md. Ahmed and others.. Respondents Counsel for appellants : Sri P. Pankaj Reddy Counsel for 3rd respondent : Sri N.S. Bhaskar Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED :1. 2012 ACJ15982) 1998 ACJ121THE HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.148 of 2007 JUDGMENT : The claimants, who are the grand-parents of the deceased girl, namely, T. Sravanthi, aged about 16 years, aggrieved by the dismissal of the claim petition against the insurer, and owner, and granting compensation of Rs.52,000/- out of the claim of Rs.3,00,000/- only against the 1st respondent driver of the lorry bearing registration No.AEO2345with interest at 6% per annum, by award dated 14.08.2006 passed by the learned Chairman of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge at Karimnagar (for short, the Tribunal) in O.P.No.835 of 2005 , preferred the appeal with conte...
N.Jakraiah and Others Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMIAL APPEAL No.334 of 2010 21-04-2014 N.Jakraiah and others....APPELLANTS State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT : COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS :- Smt.Gayathri Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT :- Public Prosecutor ?.Cases Referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.334 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A1 to A7 were tried in S.C.No.370 of 2009 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur alleging that they caused the death of one Dodda Srinivasa Rao and injuries to his elder brother, Dodda Samuel in the evening of 17.11.2008 at Challavaripalem Village of Guntur District. Through its judgment, dated 07.01.2010, the trial Court acquitted A4 to A7 of all the charges, however, A1 to A3 were convicted of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C.and punishment of imprisonment for life and fi...
Ulapa Venkataram Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,represented by P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.384 of 2010 21-04-2014 Ulapa Venkataramana.. Appellant/accused State of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by PP. High Court,Hyderabad Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri E. Venkata Reddy. Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.384 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) The appellant is the accused in S.C.No.329 of 2009 on the file of the II-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor at Madanapalle. He was charged singularly with an offence punishable under Section 302 of I.P.C., for having caused the death of his wife Sugunamma (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) on 14-12-2008 at about 06.00 a.m., in his house at Charala village, Chowdepalli Mandal, by beating her with a pestle on her head while she was sleeping. Through its Judgment, da...
Gunti Ramchander and Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Through Stat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
HONBLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.777 OF201221-04-2014 Gunti Ramchander & Ors. Petitioners/A-2 to A-5 The State of Andhra Pradesh Through Station House Officer,Narsampet Police Station, Warangal district, Rep., by Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P. Hyderabad & Anr. .. Respondents/Complainant Counsel for Petitioners:Mr. V. Raghunath Counsel for Respondents:Public Prosecutor : : ?.CITATIONS : HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.777 OF2012The court made the following :[order follows]. HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.777 OF2012ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed to quash F.I.R. in Crime No.5 of 2012 of Narsampet Police Station, Warangal district, registered for offences under section 120-B, 153-A and 506 IPC.2. Heard both sides.3. Advocate for petitioners submitted that averments of complaint do not attract any of the offences i.e., section 120-B, 153-A and 506 IPC and the petitioners as citizens have every r...
Mandavarama Krishna and Seven Ot Vs. State of Andhrapradesh and Eight ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION Nos.15688 OF2011AND batch 17-04-2014 Mandava Rama Krishna and seven others.Petitioner State of Andhra Pradesh and eight otheRs.Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S. Ramachandra Rao, SeniorCounsel for Sr.K.R.Prabhakar Counsel for respondents: Learned Additional Advocate-General appearing on behalf of the official respondents, and Sr.J. Ra HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (2010) 4 SCC502) (1997) 8 SCC1913) AIR1988SC16264) 1993(1) ALT409(FB) 5) 1995(1) ALD8016) AIR1978A.P.354 7) AIR1967SC718) AIR1985A.P.15 9) (1949) FLJ22510) (1969) 3 SCC471= AIR1970SC95111) (1973) 1 SCC99= AIR1973SC82712) 1951 Cri.L.J.391 13) 2000 (2) MPHT19314) AIR1966SC122015) AIR1961SC29816) AIR1955SC2517) AIR1955SC35218) AIR1964SC88819) AIR1966SC70420) (1964) 7 SCR89221) AIR1964SC179322) (1947) FLJ9223) AIR1963SC95324) AIR1965SC72225) (2010) 6 SCC54526) (2003) 1 SCC506: AIR2003SC26927) 2012 (6) ALD39028) AIR1954SC68329) AIR1958SC46830) AIR1960SC131231) Judgment...
Syed Zakeer Vs. Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
R. LakshmiNarasimha Rao, Member The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the order dated 17-4-2013 passed by the District Forum in C.C.No.59/2012. The case of the appellant as seen from the averments of the complaint is that the complainant is engaged in transport business and he availed loan to the extent of Rs.5,50,000/- on 29-12-2009 from the respondents for the purpose of purchasing Lorry bearing registration number AP01-V-1570. Further, it is the case of the appellant that the respondents assured him that the rate of interest on the loan amount is 7% p.a. and believing the version of the first respondent, he signed the loan agreement and several other documents. The respondents furnished repayment schedule after the appellant paid the 1st installment and the appellant came to know that the respondents charged excessive rate of interest. The appellant submitted that he paid an amount of Rs.4,81,534/- and the respondents had not issued receipt fo...
Biddika Nanjana and Others Vs. the Superintending Engineer, Apepdcl Da ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
(Circuit Bench at Visakhapatnam) S. Bhujanga Rao, Member 1. The unsuccessful complainants filed this appeal against the order dated 23.08.2012 made in CC 172/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Vizianagaram seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.5 lakhs as compensation for the death of Biddika Sridhar due to electrocution. The appellants are the complainants and the respondents herein are the opposite parties in CC 172/2011. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. 2. The brief case of the complainants as set out in the complaint is that 1st complainant is the wife, complainants 2nd and 3rd are the daughters and 4th complainant is the son of the deceased Biddika Sridhar. On 19.10.2010, while the deceased was removing door frame in his house, high tension electrical wires passing through his house in a low high manner accidentally touched his hand and thereby the said Sridhar got electrical shock and died on t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »