Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rayudu Sehsaratnam and OThe Vs. P.S.Ramaraju and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.2614 of 2007 23-04-2014 Rayudu Sehsaratnam and others ..Appellantsand P.S.Ramaraju and others.Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Sri T.N.M.Ranga Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1,2 and 4 : none appeared Counsel for respondent No.3- The New India Assurance Company : Smt. A.Jayanthi Limited HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: (2001) 8 SCC197AIR2001(SC) 3218 HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.2614 OF2007JUDGMENT: The claimants 5 in number claiming as fathers second wife, sisters and brothers(all majors) of deceased Nagarjunarao shown aged about 25 years even as per the Ex.A.2 P.M. report and as per the P.W.1 evidence, preferred the claim against the driver, owner and insurer of the lorry bearing No.AP9 T2500under Section 166 of the M.V.Act, claiming Rs.2,74,000/- in O.P.No.475 of 2006 on the file of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims TribunalcumIII Additional Judge, Kakinada (for short, Tribunal) and th...
M.Gurumoorthy and Ot Vs. C.Kamalamma and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO A.S.M.P.No.1898 of 2012 AND BATCH2204-2014 M.Gurumoorthy and others.Appellants/Plaintiffs C.Kamalamma and others Respondents/Defendants Counsel for Appellants/Plaintiffs :Sri V.L.N.G.K.Murthy Counsel for the 1st Respondent : Sri C.Subba Rao Counsel for the R-4 . :Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy learned senior counsel for Sri T.Balaji, counsel. Counsel for the 5th Respondent : Sri C.S.K.V. Ramana Murthy Counsel for the 6th Respondent : Sri N.Srihari Counsel for the Respondents 7-10 : Sri P.V.Vidya Sagar Counsel for respondents 11-13 : -- HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred:1. AIR2002Kant 96 2. AIR1973SC5693. (2011) 8 SCC6794. (2012) 11 SCC5745. (2007) 10 SCC4486. (2000) 7 SCC5437. AIR1956SC5938. (1994) 1 SCC19. (2005) 7 SCC60510. (2000) 10 SCC40511. AIR1967S.C. 1395 12. AIR1978S.C. 1329 13. 2011(2) ALD147(DB) 14. (1993) Supp (2) S.C.C. 146 15. (2009) 2 S.C.C. 526 16. AIR2007S.C. 3067 17. AIR2008S.C. 1553 18. AIR1995SC144019. (1971) 1 SCC70720. (1995) 3 SCC6932...
Deekonda Nagaiah and Anoth Vs. M/S. Laul Transport Corporation and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.492 of 2009 22-04.2014 Deekonda Nagaiah and another.Appellants M/S.Laul Transport Corporation and another.Respondents Counsel for Appellants : Sr.B. Parameswara Rao Counsel for Respondent No.1: Smt.S.N. Padmini : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2014 (1) Decisions Today (SC) 122 HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.492 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Challenging the award dated 06.12.2004 in O.P.No.2412 of 2001 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-IX Additional Chief Judge, 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The claimants 1 and 2 are the parents of the deceased girlD. Sravani, aged about 8 yeaRs.Their case is that on 28.09.20 b) Claimants filed rejoinder and pleaded that the accident spot is very nearer to Gandhi Statue which is situated at bus stop c) Respondent No.1 remained ex parte. d) Respondent No.2/Insurance Company filed counter and opposed the material averments made in the O.P and urged to put the cl e) During trial P.Ws.1 ...
K.S.P Vs. Board of Directors / Executive Committee
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.2349 of 2001 22-04-2014 K.S.PrasadPetitioner Board of Directors / Executive Committee,State Bank of Hyderabad, Head Office,Gunfoundry, Hyderabad, rep by its Managing Dir COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: Mr.K.Srinivasa Varada Chary COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS: Mr.Addepalli Suryanarayana : ?.CITATIONS: AIR1996SC1669THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.2349 of 2001 ORDER: The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for declaring the parallel disciplinary proceedings initiated by respondents 1 The case of the petitioner is that he joined the service of the State Bank of Hyderabad as a Clerk to begin with on 29 on 04-12-1991. It is the case of the petitioner that the Fort Mumbai Branch was a very large branch under the administrative It is the case of the petitioner that two Companies, namely, M/S.Eastern Mining Limited and M/S.Surya Agroils Limite 03-05-1994. It is the case of the petitioner that he was not a regular employee of the State Bank ...
Kollapu Paparao (Died)rep by Smt.K. Meri Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.32 of 2006 22-04-2014 Kollapu Paparao (died)Rep by Smt.K.Meri Lalitha Bai.Appellant State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Special P.P.for ACB,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad . Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.A. Hari Prasad Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Sr.M.B.Thimma Reddy, Special Public Prosecutor for ACB : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2002 (1) ALD443(SC) 2) 2004(2) ALD (Crl) 371 (AP) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.32 of 2006 JUDGMENT: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by the Accused Officer (A.O) aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.12.2005 in C.C.No.5 of 199 a) For the offence under Section 467 of IPC, AO was sentenced to undergo R.I for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and b) The AO was acquitted of the charge under Section 409 of I.P.C.2) Pending appeal A.O died and as per orders in Crl.A.M.P.No.143 of 2007 dated 01.02.2007, Smt.Kollapu Meri Lalitha Bai wife 3) The facts which led to file the ...
Chidipudisrinivasa Reddy and Ot Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. ByThe Publi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal Nos.1021 of 2007 AND BATCH2204-2014 Chidipudi Srinivasa Reddy and others..appellants The State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P...Respondent Counsel for the appellants:Sri T. Bali Reddy, Sr. Counsel Sri O. Kailashnath Reddy, Sri N. Vidya Prasad, Sri D. Pradyumna K Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Bojja Tarakam, Spl. PP Sri V. Raghunath, Spl. PP HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred AIR1956SC181THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K. JAISWAL Criminal Appeal Nos.1021, 1022, 1023, 1024, 1025, 1045, 1046, 1060 of 2007 & 470 of 2011 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Tsundur is a village in Guntur District with fertile lands, and the basic activity of the villagers is Agriculture. For some reason on the other, the relation between Dalits and the landholders, such as Reddies and Telagas are said t On 13.10.1990, C...
The Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikharjuna Devasthanam and An ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
GopalaKrishna Tamada, President 1. The opposite parties are appellants. The appeal is filed challenging the order dated 15.01.2013 passed in CC 7/2012 by the District Forum which allowed the complaint directing the appellants to continue service under ?Nityakalyana Pathakam?. 2. The facts leading to filing of the appeal are that the respondent paid an amount of Rs.10,000/- to the first appellant on 20.03.2006 for the purpose of enabling him to participate in the seva, i.e., Kalyanostavam every year on 18th February and as per the terms of the agreement between the parties, the first appellant would deposit the amount with a nationalized bank and utilize the interest accrued thereon, to meet the expenses incurred in performing the seva every year. The period of service offered to the respondent was to last till his life time. 3. On 4.02.2011 the first appellant addressed letter to the respondent informing him that the duration of the scheme was restricted to 10 years to all the devotees...
Ramavathar Agarwal Vs. Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Lim ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed the appeal assailing the order of the District Forum which dismissed the complaint holding that in absence of documents showing occurrence of accident within limits of its jurisdiction, it has no jurisdiction to try the matter. 2. The brief facts of the case as seen from the averments of the complaint are that the appellant insured his motor cycle bearing registration number A P-01-H-7625 with the respondent-insurance company and he met with an accident on 25.09.2010 while returning from his fields at Nirala village when his motor cycle slipped off and he fell down and sustained fracture to his right hand. The appellant was shifted to the hospital of Dr.Tippe Swamy where he was given first aid and from there the appellant was shifted to the hospital of Dr.Ajitpahadke where he had undergone surgery and a steel rod was inserted in his right hand. The appellant claimed that he incurred an amount of R...
Jaganatham Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.1485 of 2011 22-04-2014 Jaganatham ravi Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED : . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.1485 of 2011 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) A.1 to A.9 in S.C.No.396 of 2010 were sought to be tried before the Court of IX Additional Sessions Judge at Kamareddy for the offences punishable under Sec.364A, 344, 348 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. However, the trial against A.3, A.5 and A.6 could not be taken up, on account of the fact that they were not apprehended.2. The allegation against the accused was that they have kidnapped PW.6, by name Pothaipally Yellaiah of Lingampet village of Nizamabad district on ...
Ganji Chandr Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.390 of 2010 22-04-2014 Ganji Chandraiah Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Smt.D.S.Laxmi Counsel for respondent:Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.390 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The Village Revenue Officer of Kamavarapukota village PW.1 submitted a complaint - Ex.P.1 before Tadikalapudi Police Station at 08.00 a.m., on 24-03-207 stating that one Mr.Gudelli Joji - PW.5, a resident of the same village, informed him that one Ganji Chandraiah accused killed his son Ganji Venkateswara Rao, in the intervening night of 23/24-03-2007 in a brutal manner, so much so, the intestines of the deceased were coming out, and caused injuries to his wife PW.2, that he proceeded to t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »