Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Venkata Rami Reddy and Oth Vs. the State of
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.450 of 2010 24-04-2014 K.Venkata Rami Reddy and otheRs.appellants. The State of A.P...Respondent Counsel for appellants:Sr.T.Bali Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Additional Public Prosecutor. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.450 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A.1 to A.5 were put to trial in S.C.No.350 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool, alleging that they caused the death of Vanipenta Brahma Rudra Reddy, in the afternoon of 27.12.2006 in the limits of Bandarlapalli Village of Kurnool District. Complaint with reference to the offence was submitted by the brother of the deceased PW.1, at 6.30 P.M., before the P.S.Kolimigundla. He stated that A.1, by name, Katasani Venkata Rami Reddy, was the native of Tadipatri and ever since he was mar...
The Branch Manager, United India Insuran Vs. Dasari Parvathiand Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.489 of 2009 23-04-2014 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co.LTD.Vijayawada,...Appellant Dasari Parvathiand others.Respondents Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : Sr.R. Raghunandan : ?.Cases referred: 1) AIR2000Supreme Court 235 (1) 2) 2001 (1) ALT4853) 2002 (8) Supreme 594 4) AIR2004SC13405) 2003 ACJ468HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.489 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 03.10.2002 in O.P.No.497 of 1998 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-I Additional District Judg The respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal are claimants before the Tribunal and respondent No.4 herein is the fiRs.respondent be 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The claimants are wife and minor children of the deceasedD. Hanumantha Rao of Martur village in Prakasam District. Their b) Respondent No.1 remained ex parte. c) Respondent No.2/Insurance Company opposed the claim contendin...
The Divisional Manager Agriculture Insurance Company of India Ltd., (W ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
(R. LakshmiNarasimha Rao, Member) The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order dated 30-3-2013 passed by the District Forum in C.C.No.51/2012 whereby the appellant was directed to deposit an amount of Rs.80,000/- towards the sum assured and an amount of Rs.5,000/- towards compensation with interest at 9% p.a. on account of deficiency in service on the part of the appellant as also a sum of Rs.2,000/- towards costs. The facts leading to filing of the appeal are that the first respondent raised Orchid (sweet orange) crop in his Ac.5-00 gts of land comprised in survey numbers. 27 28 and 39 at Irugantipalli village of Kanagal Mandal in Nalgonda district. The first respondent paid an amount of Rs.4,370/- towards the crop insurance premium and he paid the insurance premium to the appellant through the second respondent. As per the terms and conditions of the crop insurance scheme, the appellant has to pay the sum assured of Rs.2,00,000/- in case of loss or d...
Adala Muralikrishna Reddy Vs. Govt. of A. P. Rep by Its Principal Secr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member 1. The complainant has filed this petition to condone the day of 35 days in filing the complaint on the ground the completion of project and handing over the Flat under sale is not possible on the part of the respondents and it came to his knowledge on 23.12.2013 that the respondents had not obtained sanction from the authority concerned and the fraud played upon him by the respondents has vitiated the action of the respondents. Therefore, he prayed that the delay be condoned. 2. The second respondent has filed counter contending that it is a minority shareholder holding 26% equity in the respondent no.3 and it has been victim of fraud played upon it by the respondent no.3. The respondent has contended that the complaint is not maintainable and the petitioner has not stated from which date limitation for filing the complaint has commenced and he has not properly explained cause for the delay. 3. The respondent no.3 resisted the petition on the premise th...
Yerrakula Suja Vs. Shaik Mahaboob Jani and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.1992 of 2007 23-04-2014 Yerrakula Sujatha...Appellant Shaik Mahaboob Jani and another.Respondents Counsel for the Appellant:Sri B.Parameswara Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: None Counsel for respondent No.2- The National Insurance Company : Sri R.K.Suri Limited HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. 2011(12) scale 336 2. AIR2009SC25063. 2010 (4) ALD5314. 2013 ACJ12535. 2014(1) SCC2446. (2005) 6 SCC2367. 2009 ACJ1298HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.1992 OF2007JUDGMENT: The injured girl aged hardly three years represented by father preferred the claim against the owner, insurer of the tipper bearing No.AP73577 in the claim preferred under Section 140, 163-A, 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act,1988 (for short, the Act), vide M.V.O.P. No.1095 of 2001 on the file of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims TribunalcumDistrict Judge, Guntur (for short, Tribunal) for Rs.6,00,000/- awarded Rs.2,30,000/- with interest at ...
Shukala Satish Vs. State of Andhra Prade
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CRIMIAL APPEAL No.392 of 2010 23-04-2014 Shukala Satish....APPELLANT State of Andhra Pradesh....RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT :- Smt.Gayathri Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT:- Additional Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases Referred: HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.392 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) In Sessions Case No.101 of 2009 on the file of the VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court).Visakhapatnam, the appellant herein was tried as the sole accused for the offence of causing the death of Padala Srinu of Bypireddipalem Village, Visakhapatnam District on the early hours of 14.12.2007. It was alleged that the deceased, Srinu, was being engaged as Cleaner on various lorries and that on the preceding night i.e.on 13.12.2007, the accused, Driver of a lorry, took the deceased to work as a Cleaner. P.W.2 is th...
Karolla Chinnaiah and Anot Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1214 of 2007 23-04-2014 Karolla Chinnaiah and another..Petitioners. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. . Respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: G. Shashidar Reddy, Advocate Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor : : ?.Cases referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1214 of 2007 Date:23.04.2014 The Court made the following : THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR CRIMINAL R.C. No.1214 of 2007 ORDER: This revision is preferred against judgment dated 27-08-2007 in Crl.A.No.41/2006 on the file of Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nizamabad whereunder judgment dated 12-07-2006 in C.C.No.50/2003 on the file of Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Trial of Prohibition & Excise Offences, Nizamabad was confirmed.2. Brief facts leading to filing of this revision are as follows:- On 05-07-2002, at about 4:30 P.M., P.W.1 during ...
M/S. Techno Industries, a Proprietorship Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Lt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION9437of 2014 23-4-2014 M/s. Techno Industries, a proprietorship firm having Its office at AE-456, Saltlake City, Kolkata, rep., By its proprietress Mrs. Rupa Biswas, daughter of late Amiyo Madhab Majumdar, another. Petitioner Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., (IOL), A.P. State House,3-6-436-438, naspur House, Himayat Nagar,Hyd., rep. by the Deputy General Manager, APSO And Purchasing Authority and others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Smt Sundari R Pisupati Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3:Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee : : ?. Cases referred:2004. (76) DRJ259 1975 (1) SCC702003(71) DRJ3762011 (2) ADJ723(1984) 1 SCC432014 (1) ALT299(2004) 3 SCC553AIR1987SC1359HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.9437 OF2014Date:23-04-2014 This Court made the following : HONBLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.9437 OF2014ORDER: With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents this W...
The Branch Manager, United India Insuran Vs. Dasari Parvathi and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A No.489 of 2009 23-04-2014 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co.LTD.Vijayawada,....Appellant Dasari Parvathi and others.Respondents Counsel for Appellant : Sr.Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : Sr.R. Raghunandan : ?. Cases referred: 1) AIR2000Supreme Court 235 (1) 2) 2001 (1) ALT4853) 2002 (8) Supreme 594 4) AIR2004SC13405) 2003 ACJ468HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.489 of 2009 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the award dated 03.10.2002 in O.P.No.497 of 1998 passed by the Chairman, M.A.C.T-cum-I Additional District Judge, Ongole (for short the Tribunal).the second respondent/United Insurance Company Limited preferred the instant appeal. The respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal are claimants before the Tribunal and respondent No.4 herein is the fiRs.respondent before the Tribunal. 2) The factual matrix of the case is thus: a) The claimants are wife and minor children of the deceasedD. Hanumantha Rao of Mart...
Nambada Varaha Narasim Vs. Karanam Dalamma and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.R.P.No.162 of 2014 23-04-2014 Nambada Varaha Narasimhulu.petitioner Karanam Dalamma and two others.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.N. Siva Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sr.B.S.Sivaji : : ?.Cases referred: 1.2013(3) ALT6232.2013 (2) ALD86HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM C.R.P.No.162 of 2014 DATE: 23.04.2014 ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 03.06.2013 passed in I.A.No.1903 of 2012 in O.S.No.144 of 2010 whereby the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram, allowed the interlocutory application filed by the defendants by appointing an Advocate Commissioner to localize the plaint schedule vacant site with the help of Municipal/Government Surveyor and note down in which survey number the plaint schedule property is situated. The learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff while placing reliance upon the judgment of this Court reported in A. Gopal Reddy v R.Subramanyam Reddy and A...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »