Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gundroju Prak Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.428 of 2010 28-04-2014 Gundroju Prakasam Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Sri E.Peddanna Counsel for respondent:Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : . HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.428 of 2010 Dated:28. .04..2014 Criminal Appeal No.428 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) The appellant is accused of having committed an offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C., in causing the death of his wife Gundroju Lakshmi, in the intervening night of 22/23-05-2008 at Madhura Nagar, S.Atchutapuram, Kakinada Rural. He was tried in S.C.No.159 of 2009 by the VII-Addl Sessions Judge, Kakinada. Through its Judgment, dated 07-01-2010, the trial Court found him guilty of the charge and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprison...
G. Satyanaray Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,represe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.15438 of 2013 and batch 28-4-2014 G. Satyanarayana.. Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department,Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Sri Prabhakar Sripada Counsel for respondents : Government Pleader for Revenue (Telangana Area) HEAD NOTE: ?. CASES REFERRED:1. AIR1982S.C. 1081 2. 2001(3) ALD6003. 1972(1) ALT2704. AIR1976A.P. 19 5. (1902) 1 MLJ4536. 2008(5) ALT313(DB) 7. 2011(5) ALT4208. 2011(3) ALD5719. (2000(3) ALT295 10. AIR1974S.C. 1178 11. AIR2000S.C. 3037 = 2000(7) SCC611 12. (1991) Supp. (2) SCC22813. AIR1956S.C. 305 14. (2006) 13 SCC14715. AIR1926P.C. 100 16. AIR1961A.P.361 17. 1996(11) SCC25718. 1989(3) SCC61219. 1993(4) SCC34920. 2002(5) ALT370(DB) 21. (1995) 3 SCC42622. 1999(5) ALD30923. 2002(1) ALT46624. AIR1952Hyderabad 75 25. ILR72A.P. 652 26. 1996(2) ALT95027. 1999(4) ALT209DB28 AIR1954SC57529. AIR1973SC129930. AIR1979SC86131. 2000(7) SCC6...
T. Santosh Kumar and Ano Vs. the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar and Ot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.34203 of 2011 and batch 28-04-2014 T. Santosh Kumar and another.PETITIONERS The Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar and others.RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioners: MR. V. HARIHARAN For MR. D. SUDARSHAN REDDY Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE MR. B. VENKAT RAMA RAO R3 HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. 2013 (6) ALD6782. AIR1960P&H3173. AIR2011SCW63854. 2007 (6) ALD348(FB) 5. 2003 (6) ALT1(DB) 6. 2010 (3) ALD4397. 2007 (5) ALD888. 2003 (1) ALD563(DB) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION Nos.34203 and 34206 of 2011 The Court made the following: Common Order: The writ petitions are directed against the common order dated 02.07.2011 in case No.D1/28/2005 (File No.D1/6814/2005) and case No.D1/14/2009 (File No.D1/1715/2009) passed by the Joint Collector, Mahabubnagar, first respondent herein, allowing separate revision petitions filed by the third respondent in each of the writ petitions.2. The relevant facts ...
S. Manikya R Vs. the A.P. State Wakf Board, Rep. by Its C
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-28-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.29937 OF201328-04-2014 S. Manikya Reddy.PETITIONER The A.P. State Wakf Board, Rep. by its Chief Executive Officer, Hyderabad and another.RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner :MS. N. NIYATHA Counsel for Respondents:MR. M.A.K. MUKHEED R1 MR. ALI FAROOQ R2 GIST : HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. AIR1955SC2332. (2013) 11 SCALE2103. (1979) 2 SCC4684. (2010) 8 SCC7265. AIR1985AP1276. AIR1986KARNATAKA127. AIR1998SC9728. 2012 (4) ALD1449. 2002 (1) ALD6710. AIR1985AP12711. 2011 (1) ALD61(SC) The Court made the following: ORDER: Petitioner prays for a Writ of Certiorari calling for records in I.A.No.479 of 2013 in O.S.No.45 of 2013 dated 10.04.2013 on the file of the A.P. State Wakf Tribunal (for short the Tribunal), Hyderabad and to quash the same. Petitioner also seeks a Writ of Prohibition against the Tribunal from proceeding and entertaining O.S.No.45 of 2013 on its file.2. The claim of the petitioner arises on the following facts: (a...
B. Venkataiah Vs. M/S. City Line Estates Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The complainant by name Mr.B.Venkataiah, filed the present complaint seeking refund of a sum of Rs.21,25,000/- with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. from the date of final payment i.e. 15-4-2007 till the date of realization i.e. an amount of Rs.25,18,125/- and in total, he claimed an amount of Rs.46,43,125/- with further interest @ 18% p.a. from the date of filing the complaint till the date of realization and also to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- towards inconvenience, hardship and mental agony together with costs of Rs.25,000/-. The case of the complainant as per the complaint filed U/s.17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is that the opposite parties are developers and developed a layout in the name and style of œShirdi Nivas? by its company œM/s City Line Estates Pvt. Ltd., at Nagaram Village, Maheshwaram Mandal Ranga Reddy District. In that regard they purchased an extent of Ac.5-00 of land converted the same into ho...
Gurramkonda Subramanyam R Vs. the State of
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.445 of 2010 25-04-2014 Gurramkonda Subramanyam Reddy appellant. The State of A.P.Respondent Counsel for appellant: Sr.C.Masthan Naidu Counsel for Respondent : Additional Public Prosecutor. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.445 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) The appellant herein was tried by the Court of VI Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupathi, as sole accused, in S.C.No.44 of 2008. The case as presented by the prosecution before the trial Court was that the appellant had 1/8th share in the water of a Well, known as Dorabavi at Pothavanigunta Village, whereas one Sr.P.Krishna Mandali, husband of PW.1, has 7/8th share. On 22.01.2007, it was said to be the turn of Krishna Mandali to draw water. However, by the time he went to the Well in the morning, the accused is sa...
Mareppagari Kupp Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.447 of 2010 25-04-2014 Mareppagari Kuppaiah Appellant-Accused State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant:Sri K.Rammohan Mahadeva Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED :. HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARSIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.447 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice M.S.K.Jaiswal) The Appellant was tried in S.C.No.46 of 2008 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor for the offence punishable under Sec.302 I.P.C. for having caused the death of C.Mangamma (for short the deceased) in her house at Kadathatlapalli S.C. Colony, Baireddipalle Mandal on the intervening night of 21/22.03.2007 by strangulating her. Through its Judgment dt. 25.01.2010, the trial Court found the accused guilty and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay...
G.B.C.Raj G Vs. the Government of A.P. Rep., by the Prin
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO.34137 of 2013 24-04-2014 G.B.C.Raj Gopal.Petitioner The Government of A.P.rep., by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad, A.P Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Mohd. Shafiuddin Counsel for respondents: Government Pleader for Home; Sr.M. Karunasagar; Sr.R. Raghunandan, Senior Counsel for P. Shreyas Reddy; Sr.D. Srinivas. HEAD NOTE: ?.Citations: 1) (2014) 2 SCC12) 1992 Supp (1) SCC3353) (2013) Cri.L.J.776 (SC) 4) AIR1964SC2215) AIR1955SC1966) AIR1959SC7077) 1982 Cri.L.J1557(Kerala HC FB) 8) 1976 Cri.L.J1825(All HC-Lucknow Bench) 9) (2010) 7 SCC66710) (1994) 4 SCC26011) 2002(2) AnW.R.582 = 2002(2) ALD (Crl).706 (A.P).12) AIR1997SC61013) (2005) 3 SCC64714) Judgment in W.P.No.523 of 2014 dated 21.01.2014 15) 2004(4) ALT17516) Judgment in W.P.No.13391 of 2006 dated 14.07.2006 THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.34137 OF2013ORDER: The action of respondents 3 and 4, in...
M/S. Sri Sidhartha Constructions (Represented by Its Managing Partner) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) This appeal is preferred by the opposite parties 1 to 3 against the order dated 21-1-2013 made in C.C.No.69/2012 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District whereby the complaint of the respondent No.2 herein i.e. complaint was allowed and the appellants/opposite parties were directed to complete the construction of flat No.G-3 in Sri Sidhartha Towers as per the specifications shown in the construction agreement dated 20-6-2008 and further directed the appellants to obtain permission from the concerned authorities, complete and handover the flat to the complainant within three months and also directed the appellants to pay an amount of Rs.2 lakhs towards compensation. The complaint against opposite parties 4 and 5 is dismissed. The brief facts are that the complainant booked flat No.G-3 in Sri Sai Sidhartha Towers at Bachupally village of Ranga Reddy District and in that regard an agreement of sale was entered into between the parti...
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Vs. Loyola Academy (a Society ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-24-2014
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.M.S.A.Nos.85 of 2013 and batch 24-04-2014 Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,Having its office at Tank Bund, Hyderabad,Rep. by its Commissioner and another...Appellants Loyola Academy (A society registered under Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Act, 1974,Alwal rep. by its Vice Chairman & Chief Functionary,Rev. Fr. G.A.P.Kishore..Respondent Counsel for the appellants: Mrs.A.Deepthi Counsel for the respondent: Mr.P.Dharmesh HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: 2006 (3) ALD657(DB) THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY C.M.S.A.Nos.85, 86, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100 of 2013; 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 of 2014 Dated: 24.04.2014 The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: This batch of civil miscellaneous second appeals arises out of separate but identical orders dated 19.11.2012 in M.A.Nos.27, 28, 30, 31 and 34 to 53 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyder...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »