Andhra Pradesh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Venkamma and Others Vs. .The Manager, Royal Sundaram Allianz Insura ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants herein and they approached this Commission and filed this appeal against the order dated 24th May, 2013 made in CC.No.1/2013 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Kadapa, whereby the complaint of the complainants i.e. the appellants herein was dismissed. The brief facts as per the complaint filed u/s.12 of the Consumer Protection Act are as under: B.Thirupalaiah, who was the husband of the 1st complainant and the father of the 2nd and 3rd complainants and the son of the 4th complainants, was the owner of a tractor and trailer bearing No.AP04 THTR 9438 and was hale and healthy prior to the accident and was maintaining the said tractor and trailer for agricultural purpose and also for various types of works in order to eke out his livelihood smoothly. The said Thirupalaiah, during his life time, had insured his vehicle i.e. tractor and trailer with the said Royal Sundaram Insurance Compan...
A. Seenaiaah Vs. the Head Post Master, Head Post Office, Nellore
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) A.Seenaiah, S/o.Venkaiah, a resident of Nellore claiming to be the nominee of late A.Yanadamma approached the District Forum, Nellore and filed CC.No.15/2011 stating that the said Yanadamma during her life time executed a Will on 16.07.2007 bequeathing her property, particularly the F.D.Rs in his favour. After her death i.e. on 08.09.2007 as per the nomination made by her he is entitled to the FDRs and accordingly issued a legal notice to the opposite party i.e. respondent herein on 30.07.2010 for payment of the said FDRs. As the respondent did not respond, complaining deficiency of service, the said Seenaiah filed the said complaint. The same was opposed by the opposite party/respondent herein stating that one Chintha Subrahmanyam is the nominee of the said Yanadamma and the Seenaiah has nothing to do with the said Yanadamma and in those circumstances it could not pay the claim amount. The complainant/appellant herein has not chosen to get...
Thorahathula Visalakshmi Vs. Vasudha Traders, Rep. by Its Managing Par ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) This appeal is preferred against the order in IA.No.174/2010 in an un-numbered C.C.Sr.No.1414/2010 dated 22.01.2013, whereby the District Forum at Nellore refused to condone the delay of 5016 days in filing the said complaint. For the sake of convenience the parties are referred to as arrayed in the complaint before the District Forum. The brief facts are that the complainant is a resident of Nellore and being attracted with the advertisement issued by the opposite parties became a member of the real estate monthly scheme organized by the opposite parties and paid 63 instalments at the rate of Rs.250/- each. After payment of the 63rd instalment the opposite parties wound up their business and their whereabouts were not known. Though the complainant expressed her willingness to pay the last instalment i.e. 64th instalment as the whereabouts of the opposite parties are not known she could not pay the same. After thorough search and enquiry sh...
N. Uday Kumar @ Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its P.P.,high Cou
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY and THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Crl.Appeal No.267 of 2010 04-04-2014 N. Uday Kumar @ Uday Appellant-A1 State of A.P., rep. by its P.P.,High Court of A.P., Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant: Smt. A. Gayatri Reddy. Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : AIR1976SC2263HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.267 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per Honble Sri Justice MSK Jaiswal) The appellant as A.1, and his brothers as A.2 to A.5, were tried in S.C.No.308 of 2009 on the file of the II-Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 307 I.P.C. Through its Judgment dt. 19.01.2010 the trial Court acquitted A.2 to A.5 of all the charges. However, A.1 was convicted of the charges. For the one under Sec.302 IPC he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life, and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in...
B. Veera Reddy Vs. the Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The unsuccessful complainant approached this Commission and questioned the order dated 21.09.2012 in CC.No.152/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Kurnool, whereby his claim against the opposite party for a sum of Rs.3,15,000/- with interest at 24% per annum was dismissed. The facts in nutshell are that the complainant/appellant herein is the owner of new TATA INDIGO car bearing No.AP21 M 49959 and the same was insured with the opposite party vide policy bearing No.1808792311001804 for a value of Rs.3,15,000/-. During the subsistence of the said policy the vehicle was stolen by unknown persons at Bangalaore. In those circumstances, the complainant lodged a complaint before the Jaya Nagar P.S. and the same was registered in Crime No.208/2009. Thereafter, the complainant informed the opposite party i.e. Insurance Company about the theft. The police filed a final report before the court stating that the said vehicle was not traced...
The Senior Divisional Manager, M/S. Life Insurance Corporation of Indi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) This appeal is directed against the order dated 13.06.2012 in CC.No.40/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum-I, Chittoor, whereby the District Forum while allowing the claim of the respondent herein i.e. the complainant awarded a sum of Rs.50,000/- to be paid by the appellant- Insurance Company. The notice sent to the respondent herein i.e. the complainant was returned unserved. However, as the notice was sent to the last known address of the respondent, it was held sufficient. The brief facts as per the complaint filed u/s.12 of the Consumer Protection Act are as under: Complainants husband Thirupal Naidu had taken a policy known as New Jana Raksha Plan with profits and the sum assured is Rs.50,000/- and in addition to that a sum of Rs.50,000/- has to be paid in case of accidental death. After the death of the deceased, a claim was preferred but only death benefit to the extent of sum assured was paid but accidental benefit was n...
Vardhireddy Prabhavathi Vs. the Post Master General, Divisional Post O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The appellants are the complainants and this appeal is preferred against the order dated 18th January, 2013 made in CC.No.116/2012 whereby the District Consumer Forum, Kadapa refused the claim of the complainants and dismissed the complaint. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the complaint before the District Forum. So many facts have been narrated by the complainants, but in our considered view all the said facts may not be necessary and in nutshell the facts are that the complainants are the residents of Chirajupalli village, Yerraguntla Mandal of YSR District. The husband of the first complainant during his life time opened S.B. account bearing No.2401652 in 3rd opposite party Branch Post Office on 30.03.2010. At the time of opening of the said account, he paid an amount of Rs.15/- as insurance premium covering the risk of accidental death for an amount of Rs1,00,000/-. On 19.9.2010 the said Pulla Redd...
Mungara Ramalinga Reddy Vs. the Executive Officer, Board of Trustee, T ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-03-2014
Oral Order: (Gopalakrishna Tamada, President) The appellant is the complainant and this appeal is preferred against the order dated 5th March, 2012 made in CC.No.5/2012 whereby the District Consumer Forum-II at Tirupati refused the claim of the complainant and dismissed the complaint. The brief facts as per the complaint filed u/s.12 of the Consumer Protection Act are as under: On 12.11.2008, when the 1st opposite party called for the tenders of moulded plastic chairs, the complainant was declared as a successful bidder and his tender was accepted on 11.12.2008 and by notice dated 12.12.2008 he was asked to appear on or before 25.12.2008 for entering into an agreement and by letter dated 19.12.2008 he was directed to deposit Rs.34,600/- and Rs.7,500/- towards ASD and EMD respectively and also Rs.197/- towards corpus fund. Accordingly, the complainant paid all those amounts and entered into an agreement on 09.02.2009. However, on 08.03.2009 he was asked to supply a sample plastic chair ...
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Limited Ge Plaza Vs. Jonnalagadda ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
Oral Order: (GopalaKrishna Tamada, President) The opposite party is the appellant and filed this appeal against the order in C.C.No.23/2012 dated 16-4-2013 on the file of District Forum, Adilabad whereby the complaint filed by the respondent herein was allowed. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainants husband, one Mr.Jonnalagadda Bhasker Rao, during his life time obtained a non participating unit link insurance policy bearing No.0174912630 for the period from 11-6-2010 to 11-6-2035 by paying a premium of Rs.12,500/- on 11-6-2010. As per the said policy, an amount of Rs.2 lakhs is covered in the event of death of the insured. Unfortunately the said Bhasker Rao died on 14-3-2011 i.e. during the subsistence of the policy and the complainant made a claim. After enquiry, the opposite party/insurance company repudiated the claim stating that the husband of the complainant has not stated his correct age while taking the policy. Alleging that the repudiation of the policy amo...
E.Govindhamma and Six Ot Vs. K. Srinivasulu and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.669 OF200702-04-2014. E.Govindhamma and six others..APPELLANTs K. Srinivasulu and another..RESPONDENTs Counsel for the appellant:Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy Counsel for the respondents : Sri A.V.K.S.Prasad : ?.CITATIONS:2004. (5) ALT11SC2010(4) ALD531(DB) 2009 ACJ1298AIR1968SC14132013 ACJ14031996 ACJ11782004 ACJ1AIR2011SC12342013 (7) SCC62HONBLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.669 of 2007 JUDGMENT : The claimants seven in number, who are mother aged about 74 years, wife aged about 54 years and married major daughter, four major sons, aged between 28 to 21 filed O.P.No.543 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Kurnool against the owner and insurer of the Auto bearing No.AP21V6949covered by Ex.B.1 policy for a claim of Rs.11,00,000/- of which the Tribunal awarded Rs.4,50,820/- with interest at 7.5% per annum by award dated 07.12.2006.2. Impugning the said quantum of compen...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »